Search found 38 matches
- Thu Sep 07, 2017 8:19 pm
- Forum: IDP League Discussion
- Topic: Buckner or Flowers at DL to replace Donald
- Replies: 8
- Views: 221
Re: Buckner or Flowers at DL to replace Donald
Glad I picked up Flowers. 2 sacks and counting. Thanks guys.
- Wed Sep 06, 2017 8:21 pm
- Forum: IDP League Discussion
- Topic: Shane Ray or Navorro (counter for TE or DL?)
- Replies: 12
- Views: 371
Re: Shane Ray or Navorro?
Quint wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2017 8:20 pmAGREE 110% Sometimes people just want to trade to trade. If it ain't brokelukkynumber13 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2017 7:04 pmNo way. Even in super big play scoring, Ray is injured AND largely unproven![]()
- Wed Sep 06, 2017 8:20 pm
- Forum: IDP League Discussion
- Topic: Shane Ray or Navorro (counter for TE or DL?)
- Replies: 12
- Views: 371
Re: Shane Ray or Navorro?
AGREE 110% Sometime people just want to trade to trade. If it ain't brokelukkynumber13 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2017 7:04 pmNo way. Even in super big play scoring, Ray is injured AND largely unproven

- Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:39 pm
- Forum: IDP League Discussion
- Topic: Wagner for ...
- Replies: 6
- Views: 174
Re: Wagner for ...
Can't make that trade. You are already strong at LB. The trade doesn't really address a weakness on your team, plus you are giving up WAY too much.
- Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:23 pm
- Forum: IDP League Discussion
- Topic: Buckner or Flowers at DL to replace Donald
- Replies: 8
- Views: 221
Re: Buckner or Flowers at DL to replace Donald
Flowers for sure, unless it's DT-required Buckner interests me because of the tackle for loss points and his defense will be on the field a TON. Flowers would really need to live up to the hype to get enough sacks to make up for Buckner's tackles and snap count. It's a tough call for me. I hear you...
- Wed Sep 06, 2017 1:47 pm
- Forum: IDP League Discussion
- Topic: Buckner or Flowers at DL to replace Donald
- Replies: 8
- Views: 221
Re: Buckner or Flowers at DL to replace Donald
Flowers for sure, unless it's DT-required Buckner interests me because of the tackle for loss points and his defense will be on the field a TON. Flowers would really need to live up to the hype to get enough sacks to make up for Buckner's tackles and snap count. It's a tough call for me. I mean if ...
- Wed Sep 06, 2017 1:31 pm
- Forum: IDP League Discussion
- Topic: Buckner or Flowers at DL to replace Donald
- Replies: 8
- Views: 221
Re: Buckner or Flowers at DL to replace Donald
Buckner interests me because of the tackle for loss points and his defense will be on the field a TON. Flowers would really need to live up to the hype to get enough sacks to make up for Buckner's tackles and snap count. It's a tough call for me.
- Wed Sep 06, 2017 1:12 pm
- Forum: IDP League Discussion
- Topic: Buckner or Flowers at DL to replace Donald
- Replies: 8
- Views: 221
Buckner or Flowers at DL to replace Donald
Unfortunately, I have holdout Donald on my roster and have no room to stash him once games start. We have a very short bench in this dynasty league. Buckner and Flowers are both available (believe it or not). I love the tackle for loss points, that really help a DT like Donald. Scoring: Tackle Solo ...
- Wed Sep 06, 2017 12:07 pm
- Forum: Dynasty Team Advice
- Topic: Hurns just a roster clogger?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 578
Re: Hurns just a roster clogger?
Yes he is a roster clogger. He would be the 4th option for targets right now. He's behind: Robinson, Lee, and Westbrook. Matt Breida gives you more potential upside at a much thinner position. Not to mention his offense while bad, will pound the ball. Good points but personally I'd like to see Brei...
- Wed Sep 06, 2017 11:43 am
- Forum: Dynasty Team Advice
- Topic: Hurns just a roster clogger?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 578
Re: Hurns just a roster clogger?
Yes he is a roster clogger. He would be the 4th option for targets right now. He's behind: Robinson, Lee, and Westbrook. Matt Breida gives you more potential upside at a much thinner position. Not to mention his offense while bad, will pound the ball.
- Wed Sep 06, 2017 11:21 am
- Forum: Dynasty Team Advice
- Topic: Cut for Dede Westbrook?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 436
Re: Cut for Dede Westbrook?
Unless you can put Meredith on a ir spot I'd pass on him. If not you would need to pull off a 2 for 1 deal to open a roster spot. Agree. While I like Westbrook a lot as well, his QB is awful and he is at best 3rd option behind Robinson and Lee right now. Golladay is the closest on your roster, but ...
- Wed Sep 06, 2017 10:58 am
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: What to do with DMC
- Replies: 19
- Views: 611
Re: What to do with DMC
I would love to trade him, but it seems like this might drag out like Brady and the managers I play against know this and don't want to risk much. I would be happy to start him at RB2 "IF" Zeke actually starts missing games. Also, I have no problem hanging onto him for another week or two to find ou...
- Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:14 pm
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Benefits of same team QB/RB
- Replies: 19
- Views: 3034
Re: Benefits of same team QB/RB
There has been a lot of DFS research regarding this. It's normally a negative correlation to have both QB and RB from same team. It limits you total point upside. Just think about the RB vulturing TDs from the QB or vice versa. You could argue that maybe Bell and Johnson help their QB a little, but ...
- Tue Sep 05, 2017 4:00 pm
- Forum: Dynasty Team Advice
- Topic: Big trade for Devante Parker and Dez Bryant
- Replies: 21
- Views: 615
Re: Big trade for Devante Parker and Dez Bryant
Dez and Parker are better by a mile. BTW - By "securing the 1.01", do you mean you are tanking this season? I hope that isn't way you mean. I have zero respect for a fantasy manager that would tank or a league that would allow tanking. You can position yourself for a higher pick without tanking. Th...
- Tue Sep 05, 2017 2:49 pm
- Forum: Dynasty Team Advice
- Topic: Big trade for Devante Parker and Dez Bryant
- Replies: 21
- Views: 615
Re: Big trade for Devante Parker and Dez Bryant
Dez and Parker are better by a mile.
BTW - By "securing the 1.01", do you mean you are tanking this season?
I hope that isn't way you mean. I have zero respect for a fantasy manager that would tank or a league that would allow tanking.
BTW - By "securing the 1.01", do you mean you are tanking this season?
I hope that isn't way you mean. I have zero respect for a fantasy manager that would tank or a league that would allow tanking.