Dynasty League Football

Run and Gunner wrote: The only thing I'm noticing (as a potential future DeVante Parker owner) is that I'm not sure which situation would be worse for a WR; Oakland, Kansas City, or Cleveland.

What's wrong with Oakland? I'd draft Parker if he has Carr throwing to him.

Demaryius

PackAttack12 wrote:Wouldn't be closer to me. That value is actually closer to Kelce than Gronk IMO

Agree it's not even close for Gronk, but I doubt you'll find many people willing to give up Hill and two 2nd round picks for Kelce...more like Kelce and a couple of 2nd round picks for Hill maybe...

I'd haggle and see if you can do the deal but keep any one of your first round picks. I'll take the Lacy/Jordy/Marshall side easily though. At the end of the day, all rookie picks are crap shoots, even first rounders. I'll take the three studs.

At what point do you break from the dynasty community's (read: the common opinion of the DLF forum users) and value your players based on your particular league? Example: I recently posted about trading Cobb and Andre Williams for Charles and Brady. The general consensus here was that I should be g...

I sold Freeman for the 3.01 halfway through this past season. I just don't see him becoming much more than a COP back, and I'd put money down that Atlanta will either sign a FA RB or draft one.

scottwells wrote:If this is a real trade then this isn't a competitive league or this owner has a crush on you

Umm what? It's a good deal, but I'll overpay for players that I really want. I hate when people say a league is bad just because someone values a player differently.

I'll easily keep Cam in a 20-team superflex league. I'd see if he'd be interested in Stafford and what he'd be willing to give. IMO Stafford is barely a QB1, and you have Bridgewater.

I think you won all of those trades.

I believe OP would be receiving Bryant...so no I wouldn't trade the 1.01 for Bryant, would also keep Bennett.

Needalife wrote:Dez>>>>McCoy
1st>>>>>Garcon

So, Y E S

You forgot Graham. It's an okay trade, but I think in a deep 16-team league, I'd rather hold and have the depth unless it's a very early 1st round pick.

I don't know if that would get it done, but absolutely do that trade if the Watt owner accepts.

Given that you already have so many first round picks, I'd definitely trade up for the 1.02.

Lock down #1 elite QBs are the hardest asset to acquire in superflex. DO NOT TRADE RODGERS!!! The team you already have should win that league every year for the next 5 years. Just leave it alone. This. Normally I am of the mindsight that you should always look to make moves and improve no matter h...

I would trade Kelce for the 1.01 - 1.04, but not the 1.05 at this time. Outside of Cooper/Gordon/Gurley/Parker, I don't see a talent that I like more than Kelce - and Kelce is already proven he can play at a high level in the NFL. Agreed. Even with the deficiencies in the KC offense, I want 1.04 or...