Dynasty League Football Forum

The value is fairly even, so it comes down to preference. I would do it if I thought I could flip Adams for more later. Adam’s could be used to obtain one or two good young players with a pick on top. Rookie picks are shots at production, but Adams and Hunt have shown it. You would have the 1.02 sti...

There only are 32 QBs starting each week in the NFL maximum. It would seem having a reliable QB3 would give you a leg up when it comes to bye weeks and injuries. I think Wentz is worth more than the 1.06, but even so his value will be greater once the season starts and he shows he still has it. Exam...

In a SF, your QB room looks better with Burrow in it, and you still have Stafford (in an arguably better situation), Brady, and Wentz with new life in IND (hopefully). Your RB corps is solid, both starter and depth-wise, and you have a producer at TE. You have a few WRs, but that’s where I look to i...

Without Jeudy, is it still reasonably fair? I think removing Jeudy makes it more fair, as I feel this is pretty heavily in favor of the Burrow side as it stands. It looked way better for you with Jeudy included, but still decent without him. Murray is a better producer than Burrow currently, but fo...

You also listed the top 30 assets that would be available if you enter. You get 10 of them with 3 people involved. If you can see any group of those 10 putting your team in better shape than it is now, I would go for it.

Elliott has a couple more years of decent production ahead of him when DAL gets their QB and oline healthy. Pollard looked good when spelling Elliott, so I feel he’s worth more than Gio. That makes it in your favor currently with the RBs in the trade. The 1.10 for a starting QB who will be given eve...

I sense a theme. You’re looking to justify Lawrence early and the forum is reminding you that it’s 1QB. You have to be happy with your decision, and you know your league best. That said, with so many picks, I agree that I would go RB/WR with those first three picks and seek some consolidating trades...

I like trade two, but it’s still a little light. ARob is a good WR and Hockinson is enticing in a TEP, but you lose close to 10 years of age at QB. Even dropping the 3rd from your side and getting one coming your way would sway it.

And you’re giving up an MVP QB? Lockett isn’t young either. I’d want more for Henry, much more with Rodgers thrown in.

I just saw this is not for the team in your signature. What does your build look like in the league in question? That is the main question. It would help to have starting reqs as well. If you’re not willing to share, I like the idea of looking at all assets that would be in the dispersal to see wha...

It’s reasonable enough to offer it. Depends on how the other person sees Sanders as the main piece coming back. 10-team leagues are about studs, so I like the Taylor/Watson side enough I might be willing to throw another small piece in there to get it done.

If you’re looking to sell, I wouldn’t package them. You’ve got the best two pieces in the deal. While I like CEH and Lamb, the 1.06 doesn’t make up the gap between both sets of players.

You said you can keep him on taxi one more year. That will give him a chance to show his worth next year. You’ll be able to replenish a couple other spots with the picks you have. You have a few true reaches on taxi now, but Jeudy isn’t one of them.

Maybe if he had tried this before the Wentz trade, it would’ve been closer due to the uncertainty around Hurts. Now, you should be able to get a little more for the presumptive starting QB.

It is an overpay, but you have to look at your goal. You want to shore up a starting spot with Waller and you can’t possibly start all those pieces every week anyway. I’d try to hold the 2.04 or Pittman out, but ultimately you’d reach your goal, have Golladay as a possible rebound stud, and clear so...