Dynasty League Football Forum

Mahomes for me. Unless your first ends up being super early, which it shouldn't be with your QBs alone. Who were the best available with the picks? It will hurt your depth but Mahomes is the guy to have in SF and is about 2 tiers ahead of the 1.02. 11 QBs were selected in the first 2 rounds, which ...

Mahomes for me. Unless your first ends up being super early, which it shouldn't be with your QBs alone. Who were the best available with the picks? It will hurt your depth but Mahomes is the guy to have in SF and is about 2 tiers ahead of the 1.02.

Lamb>Akers

Adam_172 wrote: ↑

Fri Feb 26, 2021 5:52 am

Am I missing something with Akers?

Nothing stood out to me from him last season to warrant this.

He got 20 touches three times last year so now he is the second best RB in the class apparently? He finished RB46... So now he is worth DK. I don't get it either.

The Akers love is pretty crazy for me. DK is a top 2 WR and Akers might be a top 12 RB. I'll take DK

Not ever a big fan of moving my next year first because you never know what could happen but this deep class could make sense. At 18 you could end up with a Chuba or a Tylan Wallace, maybe someone like Terrace Marshall drops?

Team 2 Below. Should be competing next year. First, I'd like to start by saying sorry I haven't been posting much. It is my busy season at work and I haven't been able to check in much. Just received this offer. Give: 1.07 and 2022 1st (mine so I am assuming late) Get: 1.11, 1.12, 2.06, 2.10 Looking...

Someone remember to bump this right after the NFL drat, I want to see how they compare.

As others said, I'd need much more.

Swift > Akers

Easy Barkley side. Conner Gronk and Jones do very little in a trade of this size. I'd take Barkley > Chubb, Kittle > Jones + 1.10, 1.02 > Juju

I would need more personally. I'm guessing if you send Mahomes and DK, those picks will be projected late, late firsts in PPR are not safe. I am not a Hurts believer.

I think the value is pretty good but it just comes down to how much risk you are willing to take. I could see it either way because I love the flexibility of the picks.

Watson side. He is a top 5 startup pick. I am all aboard the Lawrence hype train and would take him at the back end of the first/early second. The 1.03 for Lamb is a pretty even wash for me. I would need more than the 1.10 to move from Watson to Lawrence though. Just because you know what you get wi...

thats fine if your taking chase (or whomever)...tell your partner that, and make up the difference...2 for chubb (rebuild or not)....is not a solid deal imo. Ironically last year at this time people were asking about moving Chubb for 1.1 and the consensus (if I remember correctly) was to do it and ...