Dynasty League Football Forum

Chark/2.01 for McLaurin: I would hold McLaurin

Higgins/2.01 for McLaurin: Toss up, but I’d still hold McLaurin

Jacobs for Hunt/Samuel: absolutely

Based on the scoring Smith had, I think he is too much to give one top. I would try more another piece coming back here. I hear ya, I ended up offering: A) 1.01, Jaylon Smith B) 1.03, 1.05, 2.03, TY Hilton He mentioned he wanted to get rid of some cap space, so an aging Hilton is more of me just ta...

I would take Swift here, even in SF. I would take the more risk-averse play with since you have good enough QBs to not have to rely on Hurts.

To start, I am all for swapping Henry for a younger RB, but I would ideally want a better gamble than CEH or Akers. I'm not particularly high on CEH, but I would want him over Akers. I think Higgins is the best long term piece in any of the offers, but you don't have a need a WR and would be creatin...

Welcome! As you mentioned, QB is the biggest need area, so I won't belabor that point. Your RB group is very solid, WR is a good group that you could look to add a stud to in the draft. I like your TE group as well moving forward. You're not holding any clear sell candidates necessarily, which is a ...

Team 1- I'm not a fan of giving a solid, if aging, QB in SF without getting a QB back or a better piece than Kupp. Team 2- Nice package. Giving up Jacobs hurts, but if WR is a bigger need I see the draw. Getting Tua is a big deal. Team 3- Won the deal, IMO. Ryan is still a viable option in SF and Ja...

I think it will come up short, but definitely worth getting the conversation started. It isn't a bad offer in a SF league.

With the bigger need being RB, I would take Jacobs for this price.

Very nice startup draft! Solid across the board and should compete right away. Echoing Mtt33, I would say with rosters being so shallow, I would look to bundle end of bench guys for upgrades where you can, and go on the offensive in doing it. For example, I would try to bundle Hunt/Samuel for an upg...

I think this depends on how the rest of your team looks from a competitiveness standpoint. If you're in a spot to compete during Henry's window (1-2 years, theoretically) then I would make the move. If not, I would hold Baker and look at someone other than Henry for RB help.

Kamara>Mixon, 1.07, 2.10 Prescott>Mayfield I'm not very high on Kamara or Mixon currently. Kamara due to situational uncertainty, Mixon due to continual injuries underproducing. I like the QB upgrade from Mayfield to Dak, but having Rodgers as a starter in 1QB doesn't make this a dire need. I would ...

Value-wise, I think this is light for Hopkins. I understand the team is middle of the road, but I wouldn’t take picks only for Hopkins unless you’re completely tearing it down. I would want something like 1.02 plus a proven asset coming back.

Wentz and Lock are question marks at the moment. Love is more of a stash for the future. I would say if a QB that gets drafted into a good situation makes it to 1.05, that’s a good play if there isn’t a more pressing need for your team.

I love Hopkins, and usually would be for getting younger at RB, but I think Akers’ value is getting a bit ahead of itself (though I like him also). I would hold CMC here. I don’t see Akers replacing CMC’s production at RB and I don’t see having a shot at at top RB in the draft at 1.07. Whereas, you ...

Something like this: - I get Herbert, Ekeler, 2021 2.04 - He gets Burrow, J Rob The only thing about this is I was originally planning on taking T-Law anyways in the draft but of course the Keenan/Herbert stack looks appealing. Thanks! I would hold Burrow/Robinson easily. I like Herbert, and I get ...