Dynasty League Football Forum

Would you trade two top 3 draft picks for Metcalf? Trading two top 3 picks for anyone seems stiff, just cause generally you can sell them during the draft for more value. I’d like to see the actual trades where people are giving up several top 3 pick. Cause a top 3 pick and a projected top 3 next y...

OhCruelestRanter wrote: ↑

Fri Mar 05, 2021 10:51 am

Mike Evans has finished in the top 6 in DVOA in 4 separate seasons. The idea that Evans is inefficient is a bad one.

You've got me interested, what is DVOA (for WRs) and how predictive is it?

I get people not wanting to rely on Evans as their WR1 week to week, just because up and down week to week numbers, but the ups he has are usually week winners and his EOY totals always level up. I think he gets knocked and undervalued due to the weekly rollercoaster ride (I reference that in a lot...

Jamaal Charles was a size-speed athletic freak with really good routes, acceleration and at least average vision and decent pass pro I am not going to pretend like ETN can't be good but his 3rd down skillset isn't anywhere near that level at the moment and I don't really think his contact balance i...

Etienne is OUTSIDE your top 12? Wow. Odds are he will be in the top 12 by draft time when capital and landing spot are known but yes--purely on talent I see a straight line runner with Trent Richardson like vision teeing off running down overmatched defenses who has major pass protection risk His s...

Remind me to check your QB rankings come July hahaha, one guy I'm looking more into is Chris Simms, seems to have been a controversial rankings in the past but his rankings look better and better as the players careers flesh out. Controversy continues this year, his rankings: 1 Wilson 2 Lawrence 3 ...

Ice wrote: ↑

Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:49 am

Sriracha wrote: ↑

Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:05 am

Better idea, trade the 1.03 to a Pitts truther

BEWARE of the HATER

If taking the under on projecting a (fantastic) college TE prospect to be as good as Darren Waller is being a hater, guilty as charged.

Agree. In TE Premium you MUST take Pitts at 3 . So go QB/RB/WR for 1 and 2, whatever you like or need. I probably go Lawrence, RB (Harris/ETN), Pitts if it's me. There will be good WRs falling to you at 1.08. Better idea, trade the 1.03 to a Pitts truther like this guy for a mid 1st and a late 1st/...

Interesting off topic discussion on Hockenson vs Fant. Looking at advanced analytics, the difference between Stafford throwing to Hockenson and Lock throwing to Fant is not near the difference in advantage to Hockenson that one would think. I'm guessing you're only looking at their 2020 season? Fan...

Interesting off topic discussion on Hockenson vs Fant. Looking at advanced analytics, the difference between Stafford throwing to Hockenson and Lock throwing to Fant is not near the difference in advantage to Hockenson that one would think. I'm guessing you're only looking at their 2020 season? Fan...

OhCruelestRanter wrote: ↑

Tue Mar 02, 2021 2:26 pm

Counterpoint here would be that Ebron’s target efficiency was better because he played with those guys who demanded more coverage.

Fair counterpoint, and I'd have a much easier time buying it if he got significantly more volume.

Dude was calling Hockenson worse than Eric Ebron and yet saying he's better than Fant is the hot take I've got no issues if you prefer Drew Lock's third option though In year 2, Ebron had a higher Y/R (11.4 vs 10.8); Higher catch % (67.1% vs 66.3%); Y/Tgt (7.7 vs 7.2); and averaged only 7 YP/G less...

Hockenson has outscored Fant by like half a point per game in PPR, Fant has outscored Hockenson by like 5 total points for their careers, and Fant has played in a demonstrably worse offensive context. But yeah let’s use two “greater than signs” because there’s clearly a huge gap between these guys....

Lmao Hockenson>>Fant It was true at Iowa and it's true now Debatable: Iowa played Fant while Hock redshirted his freshman year. Fant was more productive during their Sophomore seasons. Hock was more productive during their Junior year. So Fant was better than Hock 2 out of 3 years in college. Fant ...

Ice wrote: ↑

Mon Mar 01, 2021 5:52 pm

Regarding Pitts, I like his upside more than Hockenson or Fant.

Hockenson, yes.
Fant, no.

Side note: TJ Hockenson's career up to this point has been less impressive than Eric Ebron's first 2 years in the league. He might join the elite TEs, but it's far from a forgone conclusion.