Dynasty League Football

Peter Howard (@pahowdy) did a whole podcast on the myth of vacated targets last August or September iirc. What he came up and I completely agree with is talented guys will command targets, they aren't given to them just because player x went to another team. Player x "takes" his targets with him. H...

Here are a few more guys I'd throw out there: C. Ridley - He fits Godwin's profile very similarly: his team's 2nd pass-catcher entering his 3rd season on a pass-heavy team, slated to lose a large number of targets in the off-season (Hooper & Freeman combined for 167 targets. He's talented, but the ...

Thinking about RB landing spots that wouldn't be total headaches? Miami Tampa Bay Atlanta Houston Kansas city San Diego if they move on from Gordon Indy if they move on from Mack Tennessee if they move on from Henry Arizona if Drake leaves Baltimore if they move on from Ingram NYJ if they move on f...

In a big rebuild, rb is the last position you want to build on so WR and TE makes a lot of sense right now. And selling a top te for unknown prospect in the pick 5 to 8 range doesn't make much sense when you would just have a big hole at TE. If you had another TE to build around then it would be a d...

Moore has the hype currently and the age advantage. I would rather have Moore over Golladay + 1.09.

No, it's not a size thing. I suppose Duke Johnson and Gio are two other examples too. I see a player that is destined for a passing only role because of the copycat nature of the NFL. An example is NE was effective using James White in this way. They arent the only ones but now everyone seems to be...

If he gets signed to some type of new deal with the cards, I could easily see him going for a mid to late first with how he did. So now could be the cheap time to acquire if you are a believer.
He went for early 2nd and a 3rd in my league before the talks of resigning.

pvillebiker wrote: ↑

Sat Feb 15, 2020 6:17 pm

I play in a couple SF leagues & wouldn't take either at 1.01 even in the SF format.

In full ppr this past season Mike Evans and Hopkins averaged 18 ppg, and Dak and Stafford averaged 20 ppg. Now you have to factor in QB scarcity in SF, it's not even close who should be picked.

pvillebiker wrote: ↑

Sat Feb 15, 2020 6:17 pm

I play in a couple SF leagues & wouldn't take either at 1.01 even in the SF format.

In full ppr this past season Mike Evans and Hopkins averaged 18 ppg, and Dak and Stafford averaged 20 ppg. Now you have to factor in QB scarcity in SF, it's not even close who should be picked.

Coming out of college I was almost sure he was going to be a stud. Such a shame

Jcedwards wrote: ↑

Fri Feb 14, 2020 11:44 am

Would Gardner Minshew and 3.10 (or 3.05) be enough or is that insulting?

Guy dropped stafford and picked up Minshew, so I think its a fine offer to make. Just depends on if the other guy is competing or wants youth. Stafford is a good QB.

We saw what he did his rookie year and we'd be lucky if anyone taken with a mid 2nd does what he did. Curious how much of that do you think is his own skill and how much of that do you think its because most of team was hurt and out? Steven Sims and Greg Ward also did pretty good when they were one...

For offer #1,
2 qb likely to be better next season, a good te in a te premium league, and the 1.09. Way too much and mahomes side should be adding way more

This year is pretty deep, I can see people easily preferring Zach moss, Tyler Johnson, Edwards, Mims, Burrows (early to mid 2nd), etc. Over Slayton even with his early success.

Allen is a great player, but in a rebuild I would go with 1.02. If you are looking to trade Allen, maybe you can get something on top of 1.02 for allen.
1.02 is much better than Diggs too.