Dynasty League Football Forum

no, totally viable strategy. If someone cant manage their bye weeks then that's their business and they deserve to pay the price. equally, if someone is smart enough to pick up a QB (assuming you have fixed roster size they are paying the opportunity cost of tying up a valuable spot on their roster)...

I think it is stupid when people say they wont sell someone for ANY price. Everything has its price if you are being smart and objective. Sure, you may love a player and think he is integral, but there is always a bid out there outlandish enough to make you sell, or at least there should be if you a...

... deleted

Bishop Sankey. ouch

Laquon Treadwell
Christine Michael

could you post the results / updates on here please? your site is restricted from viewing on our work servers. thanks

Gave: Anthony Miller Rec: T.J. Yeldon think you'll regret that in 12-24 months time yeldon needs a clear path to playing for the deal to make sense and he is fairly pedestrian as it is. Miller had a good rookie year and should grow into a solid WR2 role there in an offence that should see its pass ...

send him back something even more offensive. like perhaps you receive gurley and send him eric dickerson

see how he likes it, it wont happen again

if it destabilises the league then yes you should feel bad.

I believe the way you are looking at it is correct. 3 way tie between teams for 2 spots. - Goes to 1st tiebreaker which is null because they didn't play each other or equal games (in a 16 team league this needs to be reconsidered because it will always happen). - Go to 2nd tiebreaker which is point...

three years ago. the second best time is now

We always use total points after record for the first tie breaker. That way, you don't have to account for scheduling inequities. I'd switch to total points as tie breaker #1 for 2019 followed by H2H as tiebreaker #2. Besides, everyone has a bad week now and then. It would stink to have a superior ...

skip wrote: ↑Tue Dec 04, 2018 5:19 pm It's actually quite easy given your rules... Since there is no H2H involving all of the teams, it doesn't apply thus the first team in is based on total points (team A). You then go back and start again to determine the next team in and B defeated C in H2H.

agreed.

I believe the way you are looking at it is correct. 3 way tie between teams for 2 spots. - Goes to 1st tiebreaker which is null because they didn't play each other or equal games (in a 16 team league this needs to be reconsidered because it will always happen). - Go to 2nd tiebreaker which is point...

We always use total points after record for the first tie breaker. That way, you don't have to account for scheduling inequities. I'd switch to total points as tie breaker #1 for 2019 followed by H2H as tiebreaker #2. Besides, everyone has a bad week now and then. It would stink to have a superior ...

I believe the way you are looking at it is correct. 3 way tie between teams for 2 spots. - Goes to 1st tiebreaker which is null because they didn't play each other or equal games (in a 16 team league this needs to be reconsidered because it will always happen). - Go to 2nd tiebreaker which is point...