Dynasty League Football Forum

I would move that for Taylor. Solid price to lock him up.

I would still hold your side here, but I think you are giving the best asset.

Tough place to be for sure...You have some solid pieces in place based on the format but also not enough high end assets based on the format. I can see how you are stuck in the middle of the league. I don't view your team as an out and out contender which leaves you in a tough spot. I would shop CMC...

Not a bad price to move up. Late 2nds and 3rds don't have a great hit rate overall, so I could see paying this.

Is the 1.08 on top good enough? I would still rather hold in SF. Will do i was on the fence about it so I'll hold I think that is a good call. If Jones keeps ticking along, who knows what Dillon will be if anything and Kupp is not likely to ever return great value versus what you are giving up on t...

Multiple 1sts/equivalent value seems like a fair ask still. The Rodgers news will certainly make some owners questionable on buying, but a true contender should still want to add Adams even if the price is high. He is a monster asset and his week to week points were unmatched last year. I would be l...

BucBuc wrote: ↑

Tue Apr 20, 2021 12:46 pm

Is the 1.08 on top good enough?

I would still rather hold in SF.

I'm not super high on Tua long term, so take that into account but I think Zeke + Pollard is a fair ask in SF. Sutton is still a solid piece but his value is at an all time low heading into the season post injury. I think the 2.05 on top is a tall ask, but maybe not? If you don't want to include Sut...

I think Hunt helps your RB depth and the price is decent. Even with starting Chubb, I think you could flex Hunt in a bind. Overall, I like this deal for your team. Awesome thank you! I’m trying to balance my love for trying to find the next big thing in the draft with practicality. My practical sid...

I think Hunt helps your RB depth and the price is decent. Even with starting Chubb, I think you could flex Hunt in a bind. Overall, I like this deal for your team.

As much as I like Aiyuk, I think I would lean the Akers side here. He seems to be in for a heavy workload on an improving and solid offense. Heavy preference based trade here though as this is pretty even.

I would move the 2.10 for Conner if contending, but not the 2.05.

I dont mind trade #1, but I think Metcalf is a great piece long term. I would have held for Lawrence in trade #2 in SF for sure.

In a 1 QB league even with Jones drop in value, this is pretty pricey. Pass for me.

With going full rebuild, I would be going BPA. It's a boring answer, but it maximizes your value both in the draft and on the market if you look to trade. Your team has holes at each position and that makes BPA even safer. My only other philosophy, would be leaning WR if each player available is in ...