Dynasty League Football Forum

I can see every team on here besides Houston wanting to draft a RB to be their starter next season. Obviously not every team will be able to do that, but none of those teams would surprise me if they went early (first 3-4 rounds) with a RB pick.

I think you'd be giving up a lot of value, but I'd make that deal. I think this will make your team a contender and who knows where those other picks in 2018 and 2019 will end up.

Early/mid 1st at least.

Since I only have McCoy as a starter now before I draft Cook or LF, I was thinking of trading my 2018 1st for T. Coleman, then thought of offering this trade to another owner ( who loves howard ). This would leave me with 4 firsts next year and they all come from the same division. The only pick I ...

I like both trades.

I'd probably drop Wilson as Butler probably has the better opportunity, but wouldn't expect much from either.

Valhalla wrote: ↑Thu Feb 23, 2017 6:08 pm 2 points per game is actually a lot of separation

In ppr, that's one extra catch for 10 yards. I'm not trying to downplay it, but I expected the difference to be more.

I like both a lot, but I'd probably take Nuk by a hair. Even with the superior QB play, Cooper only outscored Nuk by 2 ppg in my league. Before checking the stats, I would have guessed it would have been much greater than that.

Outside of Doctoson, the other 3 pieces in the deal don't do much for me. If you feel that Doctson is worth the 1.05 or better, than you obviously make this trade. For your team, I'd rather be looking to get another RB with that pick, if you're going to trade it.

I voted Crowder, but I don't think it's a terrible trade if the 2018 2nd ends up being early.

I just don't see the incentive for you to get Charles. Don't think he's going to be the missing piece in helping your team contend and will only slow down your rebuild process. No point in trading for a player who's only going to depreciate in value (I may be wrong and he could bounce back, but I wo...

I would first see if the Henry owner is interested and try and get an early/mid 1st for him (assuming he has one).

Hard to tell what team this is for since you have Ingram on one and Henry on the other. If it's for team 1, I'm not trading Ingram for Henry. If it's for team 2, I'd trade Henry for Ingram. Assuming you're asking for one of your teams. If not, in a vacuum, Ingram should have more value.

Unless the 2.01 was on the clock and someone I really liked fell to that pick, I'd have a really difficult time trading a first rounder for the 2.01 just blindly. It doesn't matter how strong your team may be, you're never guaranteed anything in fantasy football. If you reverse the situation, I wou...

I agree that it was a good trade based on value. Being a superflex and already owning Luck and Mariota, I'd look to cash out on Brees who should still hold a lot of value. I also agree with trying to trade Gronk. You should be able to get a solid third QB and at least one really good RB for Brees an...

That's pretty crazy!