Dynasty League Football Forum

I went with Gordon, although I like the idea of you trying to trade a RB for a WR since you have Bell, Gordon, and the top 2 picks. I'd try and trade down from 1.01 or 1.02 to 1.04 and see what you can get for that. But if your goal is to take LF and DC and want to trade Gordon, try and see what pro...

I don't think I'd give a first for him, so I agree with lucky in starting with a mid 2nd.

Not a bad deal, but I'd take the Elliott side.

Since you're the one making the offer, start with Ajayi and a 2nd. Doubt that gets it done, but no point in trying to offer too much right away. I doubt the other owner is insulted by that and will hopefully counter and you can get an idea of what he's looking for in return.

I doubt Chicago drafted Howard last year to be their starter, but it worked out for them. Actually I think that's exactly why Chicago drafted Howard last season... They let Forte go to the Jets and Langford was completely ineffective the year prior. It wasn't an "if", it was a "when&...

http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/9409/jeremy-hill

Maybe Cincy should have been on this list...although, I still don't think this happens.

For people only listing 3 teams, is it because you think only 3 RBs will be drafted in the first 3-4 rounds, only 3 RBs will be worthy of starting for teams, or other teams not listed on the poll will be taking the other potential starting RBs in the draft? I'm not saying every team on here will dr...

This is tough. I think it's pretty even, but might lean towards the Howard side. I'm usually the one offering packages like that for studs, but this might be a tad much.

For people only listing 3 teams, is it because you think only 3 RBs will be drafted in the first 3-4 rounds, only 3 RBs will be worthy of starting for teams, or other teams not listed on the poll will be taking the other potential starting RBs in the draft? I'm not saying every team on here will dr...

For people only listing 3 teams, is it because you think only 3 RBs will be drafted in the first 3-4 rounds, only 3 RBs will be worthy of starting for teams, or other teams not listed on the poll will be taking the other potential starting RBs in the draft? I'm not saying every team on here will dr...

For people only listing 3 teams, is it because you think only 3 RBs will be drafted in the first 3-4 rounds, only 3 RBs will be worthy of starting for teams, or other teams not listed on the poll will be taking the other potential starting RBs in the draft? I'm not saying every team on here will dr...

I'd take the Sanders side pretty easily. You'll probably be able to trade Sanders and get more during the season to a team who's contending. Perkins value might be at its' highest now if NY drafts another RB, so I'd try and trade him now. Use the 2.07 as a sweetener in a deal to get who you want. I'...

For people only listing 3 teams, is it because you think only 3 RBs will be drafted in the first 3-4 rounds, only 3 RBs will be worthy of starting for teams, or other teams not listed on the poll will be taking the other potential starting RBs in the draft? I'm not saying every team on here will dra...

This isn't like last year where the 1.1 was a legit obvious choice. And remember people were still on that sad Treadwell train and taking him ahead of Zeke. Strong possibility you get a Cook/Fournette at 4, or even better Corey Davis. Landing spots will shake things up big time. At least wait until...

1.02 > Howard
Coleman >>> CJA
Random 2018 1st < 1.04

I'd probably go with the 1.02 side.