Dynasty League Football Forum

I voted for Lamb before the OP clarified the SF setting. I think that makes it a lot closer. If you need a QB or RB I could see going with the 1.03, but I’d take Lamb over any WR in this class.

In 1QB, Nuk alone >> Herbert. I also don’t think the gap between Herbert and Hurts is very wide. This is a smash accept if I’ve ever seen one.

I haven’t looked at any redraft rankings, but if people are drafting/buying Aaron Rodgers, David Montgomery or Calvin Ridley expecting similar production to last year, I think they’ll be sorely disappointed.

I’m a huge proponent of playing double-headers every week and starting the postseason as early as possible to facilitate multi-week semifinals and championship games. It still preserves the H2H aspect of FF that we all got hooked on (except X2!) and provides a big enough sample size (22-24 games) f...

I’m starting to come around on the whole “get your guy” thing. I’m a lifelong CU fan and watch damn near every snap they take, year in and year out. If anything, I’ve probably faded CU players like Lindsay and Shenault because I don’t want to fall victim to homerism, even though I damn well KNEW the...

I would probably pay that for Pollard even if I didn’t own Zeke. I own Pollard in a 1QB league (don’t own Zeke) and I wouldn’t move him for that. The pick is a little more valuable in SF, but I think it’s still worth it, especially if you’re a contender.

Oof. That’s rough. I imagine this offer isn’t going anywhere, so I’d probably wait until closer to the start of the season and see how Watson’s situation shakes out.

This is easily the 2022 1st. Literally the worst thing that could happen is it’s the 1.10 next year and you just lost a year of cashing it in, but from the sound of it, the ‘22 1st will be significantly better. This is a very low risk/very high reward proposition.

I’d like it better if you could take out Mims and Davis, but I think I’d still take the Godwin side as is.

Are there salaries involved? If so, that info would be helpful. If not, I agree with everyone above. Tag Barkley.

olmansmith wrote: ↑

Thu Apr 01, 2021 3:13 pm

Holding him for a year was not the move

Weird flex but okay.

In a rebuild, you want to accrue value as quickly as possible. I think the people telling you to take Chase at 1.01 over an RB are doing so on the assumption that you’re going to keep that player for several seasons. The reality is that RBs accrue value much more rapidly, so as long as you’re willin...

Long term, the value is clearly on the Godwin side, but over the next 1-2 years, Kelce will likely help you a LOT more. You know your league better than we do, obviously. If you think this move makes you a legitimate contender, then go for it. Yes, it makes you super thin at WR with having to start ...

I own both in the same league. I’d say I value Sanders a touch more, but I could see it going either way.

Why are you so confident that Chase will be there at 1.04? I can definitely see Harris and Etienne going ahead of him, but are you really that confident that Williams’ landing spot will be favorable enough to push him above Chase?