Dynasty League Football Forum

PM sent (feel free to email me, too!)

repkllrs wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:01 pm If I needed help everywhere, I would definitely take the 1.05/1.11.

This for me, too.

I love ARSB. LOVE him. Waaaay overpaid to get him last year in Team 1 and haven't looked back. And this is an offer I'd accept. I get the risk. Of course, there's also risk holding onto a player, even one who has performed as incredibly well as St. Brown. Maybe he drops to top-10WR. Maybe he only ha...

It seems like I'm on an island so far, but I don't like either of the counter-offers. I'd hold in both cases. Yes, the bottom could easily drop out of both Z White and R Wilson (I actually traded R Wilson for Team 1 in sig for that exact reason). My biggest issue is that I don't think too highly of ...

Smash accept on value.
Smash accept given your QB room.

All this because you want 2.03? That's like the 6th most valuable piece in this trade!

I think I'd pause, hit the reset, tell the other owner your real target is 2.03, and just go from there.

I would rather have the two 25 2nds very easily on a competitive team. In season, you'll definitely need to make some moves, and those are key assets to do it. Menace2010 suggests getting a 2025 1st when OTC. Obviously, if that's an option, I'd do that instead. But I'm pretty skeptical of the likeli...

Young is waaaay too risky in a 14-team SF league as your QB2, IMO.

I'm taking the Aiyuk side, but I'm worried about the Spears/Monty swap. If you don't need either to be a critical component of your 2024 squad, I feel a lot better about this trade. If you're planning on putting either Monty or Spears in your starting lineup from week 1 through the end, I would fee...

TE depth with both Kittle and Njoku? I recognize he doesn't have a top 5 QB, but Dak and Cousins is a great starting duo (at least short-term)... I'm in mostly 14-16 team leagues, perhaps that's clouding my judgment. But this team looks like a contender to me. Fair. I'm not high on Njoku at all. As...

I think to future 2nds is about the best you can hope for for one of them. If you can get close to equivalent value, I'd do it ASAP. You could otherwise be holding the bag on both. Obviously, if you can add something to get a future 1st, I'm 100% in. Or if it's 2.01 and future 3rd... I wouldn't trad...

First off, your team is absolutely stacked. So making a consolidation offer like this isn't a biggie to you. Second, if he's willing to offer now, he'd be willing to offer in two weeks. To me, this is a trade you cannot make without knowing the landing spots. And that is solely because of Minnesota...

tstafford wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 6:49 am Sometimes I think the best move is to trade purely for value during the non-playing season and deal with roster construction much closer in. But I do have a hard time sticking to that.

^^^This.

I agree w/ Troll - see if you can get something added. Wilson is still valuable in SF. But do the deal somehow. I'd rather be holding the first regardless of whether I'm a contender or not . If I'm not a contender, I'd hold it until next season. If I am a contender, it can be used in-season to add ...

With your lineup, pretty easily a veteran ("veteran"). Even though it's only start 2WR, you have three flex. Your roster is starter-heavy. With the flexes, whatever player you use 1.03 for is going to play a lot of games for you. Plus, even though Waddle or D Smith are veterans, it's not l...