Dynasty League Football Forum

I would lean toward keeping Dobbins as, to me, RB is the higher value position with such a shallow starting lineup (1 flex). If I were to choose between the 2 scenarios because you really want to add Lamb, I would prefer Ekeler over 1.10/Edmonds because you have a strong team (as evidenced by your u...

What are thoughts about how the backfield will shake out in Arizona? Is there any value in this backfield? Coaching staff haven't shown they greatest faith in Edmonds while Conner hasn't shown the ability to stay on the field. What's the most likely outcome? 60/40 split? 50/50? Cards draft a rookie ...

8 team league with shallow bench, Juju is WW fodder for me. If you're looking to flip Ridley (or Godwin) for a RB, you should just trade the 2023 picks for that player.

You never know, but asking for anything added to the Stafford side is likely to elicit a submission to the 'Worst trade offers received' thread. If you can work some mojo to make it happen, you would likely be the world's greatest salesman.

I'm with Jigga and abloom. Goal should be to win in 2021. You only need RBs as Waller takes the R/W/T flex and then use 2 WR for the other flexes. Any future assets you can trade for RB to help you make a run in 2021 should be the priority.

I like these kinds of polls where there is some debate on which side people prefer instead of the ones that are clearly one-sided.
I chose McCaffrey + Higgins because for the referenced team, I think McCaffrey is a bigger difference maker and I would rather hold that advantage at RB.

He falls into the bucket of potential one-year only starters. Behind Hurts, ahead of guys like Dalton, Roethlisberger, Newton, Fitzpatrick. Late 1st /early 2nd (1.11-2.02) seems about the area for the asking but I wouldn't be paying that nor looking to acquire.

The experiment: Assess your team-building preferences and fantasy football values by selecting which startup builds you prefer. You will be presented with team rosters from a startup draft completed in February. Your task: Analyze each team and decide which team you would you want for yourself. What...

Good decision. With 9 non-QB starters, the 1.12 was too late to likely have a positive impact on your lineup and losing production by waiting for a 2022 1st doesn't fit your build with 2 elite TE and QBs.

With no TE premium and 8 starting RB/WR, I'll take McCaffrey/Lamb. The drop from Kittle to Andrews should easily be overcome by the gain from McCaffrey over whomever you would have trot out at RB2.

I would look at 2 years as that gives you some flexibility. If his production drops, then you walk him and use the cap elsewhere. If he is still good, you could use another tag (if possible) or try to re-sign for less as he would be older and maybe a less desirable target.

Moving up 2 draft picks (5 rounds and 4 rounds) while dropping 4 spots is still great value and sets you up to continue trading down. If you don't want the back-to-back round trade out, I would counter with 9/11

The experiment: Assess your team-building preferences and fantasy football values by selecting which startup builds you prefer. You will be presented with team rosters from a startup draft completed in February. Your task: Analyze each team and decide which team you would you want for yourself. What...

StripesOfKC wrote: ↑

Fri Apr 02, 2021 2:24 am

a guy like Chase (who I see and a Can't Miss guy on the level of every elite WR prospect I have seen in my lifetime)

Best to go with your convictions. The price is small (if you can get it done for what you've stated) as you're not giving up anyone from your starting lineup.

BradysBunch wrote: ↑

Fri Apr 02, 2021 5:26 am

If you like chase more, than do it. My concern...chase won't be there at 3. I would wait until the pick is on the clock.

x2