Dynasty League Football Forum

ehasz15 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2019 6:06 pm David Montgomery

Same here

This guy balled out last night!!!! I am pissed because I passed on he and Mixon for Corey Davis!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SMH Davis BETTER BALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SMH Don't worry about your decision. Davis was the right decision and the 1.1 on many rookie boards. He m...

I really like Adams. At worst I believe he wins the WR3 from Boykin next year. And is it really a bad thing to be the WR3 in the Packers offense? Not IMO

Not enough for me. I am not that high on Crabtree and TR has, so far, been a bust. The 1.5 doesn't come close to closing the gap

DonBrazi wrote:Think that's a cheap price to sell at. I'd need a player that I liked involved.

I agree. His value is sky high right now. Way too cheap IMO

not with your team. roll with stacy

you have to say Michael even if you are not sold on him. his value is so hyped right now you have to take him based on that alone

If you had to bank on one of them long term who would you roll with and who do you think has the highest ceiling? Those are two different questions. I would "roll with" Matthews but I think Patterson "has the higher ceiling." I agree with this Exactly. i cant think of anything e...

I prefer Alshon but it is so close that if i owned either one i wouldnt be trying to get the other unless someone really wanted the player i owned and offered me value.

Devante for me as well.

I agree that you are definitely in rebuild mode and Forte is definitely undervalued in the fantasy world. I would try and see if I could get the 2.6 dropped as well. Or maybe add his 3rd to it if he insists.

I like Bortles long term as the better 'NFL' QB but in terms of fantasy upside I go Bridgewater as well.

Breezy12 wrote:I don't think this is even a debate.....and I hate Harvin. Harvin is worth 2-3 Torrey Smith's

I have to agree with this whole heartedly.

That is close so I take Pierce just by attrition. At least Pierce has shown me something. Miller may end up being the better option but he hasn't shown it yet.

Tate by a large margin. He has the better situation and opportunity, less durability concerns, similar talent level and youth. I think you accidentally wrote Tate instead of Sankey here. Less durability concerns for Tate? Whhhhaaaatttt?!? That's funny cause I never even put that together until it g...