Dynasty League Football Forum

No absolutes on either, and your point is well taken. Too many times the off-season darling turns into a pumpkin. Of course, the 1.01 can be a bust just like Parker. Given circumstances in MIA and the potential of Zeke handed the RB1 role in DAL, OAK, PHI.... etc - give me the 1.01 Sent from my SCH-...

Trouble with Parker is you have to pay for potential vice proven production (see CPatt 2013) which often does provide the ROI required of such prices. Give me the potential of the 1.01 vs speculation.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

schiewerma21 wrote:Easily Elliot here.

Parker is one of the most overvalued players in dynasty right now.

Easily 1.01 > Parker



Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

alphaxray wrote: I always go over the top on trades. Never know what's gonna be accepted

But of course I work down from it to get where I actually think the value is at

That will quickly place you on the "Insta-reject, no counter" list of most owners



Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

In today's FF pedophiliac landscape, sadly few owners will give Cooper plus anything for AB.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

More than fair - 2.01 > MB

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

Some just need a break from FF from Jan-Mar, it also reinforces doing your due diligence before joining by viewing activity level of prior years OR if a new league incumbent upon the commish to vet prospective owners activity level in other leagues. A note in the bylaws helps reinforce expected enga...

Received an opening offer of my twp (2) 2017 1.r's for MB on Sunday...

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

Stuck to my guns of Cooper+Ingram for 1.01, 17first, TY plus flier and got shot down. Also just received email telling me that D.Martin, Funches, 1.03, and a 17 first are worth MUCH more than Cooper. Maybe they are but I'd bet Martin does less (Sims and passing game will take more) and Funches hasn...

DrNoish wrote:I don't like any of those three, and numbers 2 & 3 are BS offers

Yeesh... agree ^^^^^

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

Ththaman wrote:What about TY??

JMatt & TY are close to equal

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

Badger wrote:I'd actually prefer B. I love DGB talent, but a lot still has to go right, and Gordon was pretty bad by any measure as a rookie. It's close, but I'd take B.

Agree.... best athlete is White and throw a 2017 1.r on top ---- BINGO!

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

jpusmc0311 wrote:JMatt is worth more than DT in dynasty. One is on the decline and the other one is still young and good.

As a JMatt supporter, I have trouble getting behind this. At best they are equal, but a late 1.r is probably the difference.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

You proved my point. .. the Parker hype has driven the adp to a "bubble effect"... not saying he wont be a good player but Julio is a transcendent talent that has 4-5 years of elite production. For the trade to work out, Parker would need to perform at top 10 wr level over 5 years and the ...

The Parker hype has gone a bit too far now.... take a knee, drink water.... JULIO easily

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk