Search found 3408 matches
- Fri May 24, 2024 10:12 pm
- Forum: Dynasty Team Advice
- Topic: Trade Kincaid for a WR/Picks?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 300
Re: Trade Kincaid for a WR/Picks?
No need to move a rising star, with TEP, and the amount of flex spots you have. Frankly you just need to upgrade all around/package for upgrades. This was the draft to fix WR problems. Unless you expect most of your picks to be early next year. Dell and Addison are fine if you are strong elsewhere. ...
- Fri May 24, 2024 8:14 pm
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Christian Watson
- Replies: 24
- Views: 1823
Re: Christian Watson
Now THIS, is interesting. https://x.com/Easton__Butler/status/1793988484404785293 So, interesting, but also, what’s to say there isn’t a big disparity BECAUSE of the injuries. This is exactly what I asked the wife (PT) when I saw this report. Without a baseline of what is normal for him I don’t see...
- Tue May 21, 2024 9:21 pm
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Not at all early 2025 Draft thread
- Replies: 106
- Views: 9768
Re: Not at all early 2025 Draft thread
The big 3 WR for me are Burden, Tet and Stewart as well I agree as well, but I wouldn't be surprised if Stewart did not come out in 2025, due to a down 2023 season due to QB injury, and 2024 being a transfer year. Hurdles that Tet and Burden have not had to deal with. You’re suggesting Stewart won’...
- Tue May 21, 2024 3:06 pm
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Not at all early 2025 Draft thread
- Replies: 106
- Views: 9768
Re: Not at all early 2025 Draft thread
Burden is certainly a very good prospect (not elite) but shouldn’t be the consensus 1.01 imo. The reason as to why Tet is gaining traction (and as of this moment my 1.01) should stem from his ability to win outside as opposed to Burden seemingly lining up exclusively from the slot. By no means am I...
- Tue May 21, 2024 12:59 pm
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Not at all early 2025 Draft thread
- Replies: 106
- Views: 9768
Re: Not at all early 2025 Draft thread
So combined remaining roomie and devy draft makes some more sense. But man, that the 26 QBs did not go at all is WILD.
- Tue May 21, 2024 5:44 am
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Not at all early 2025 Draft thread
- Replies: 106
- Views: 9768
Re: Not at all early 2025 Draft thread
Hi Everyone, new on the forums in our devy league that we did draft in march 2024 i ended up drafting. really wanted to load Rb since it's a superflex league with another flex RB-wr-te treveyon, quinshon and many others were already gone. we can only player in the current draft and the one who will...
- Mon May 20, 2024 2:45 pm
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1841
Re: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
I saw a trade making the rounds on twitter today, asking this same question. I'm team #NeverVeto, but was a bit perplexed by this one. The trade was: Team A: 1.03+ AJB Team B: 1.02 + Daniel Jones + Hubbard + Bigsby + Renfrow The context was that there were two orphan teams. They found a manager and...
- Mon May 20, 2024 12:48 pm
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1841
Re: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
Good stuff here. I recently took on two new orphans as I liked the challenge of trying to resurrect them. One had the 1.01 and I wanted a share of Bijan so that plus the 1.06 was enough to entice me to take it over. Two years in and through a number of moves I have drafted Bijan, JSN, Downs, Harris...
- Mon May 20, 2024 12:46 pm
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1841
Re: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
I saw a trade making the rounds on twitter today, asking this same question. I'm team #NeverVeto, but was a bit perplexed by this one. The trade was: Team A: 1.03+ AJB Team B: 1.02 + Daniel Jones + Hubbard + Bigsby + Renfrow The context was that there were two orphan teams. They found a manager and...
- Sat May 18, 2024 9:37 am
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1841
Re: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
Not. At. All. I'm saying that I don't think it's 50% lopsided. I certainly don't think it's egregious, as the title of your post suggests. You're making the argument (I think) that Commish/league intervention should not be reserved for collusion only. IMO, that's an interesting conversation. What t...
- Fri May 17, 2024 2:19 pm
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1841
Re: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
I mean, that's not a trade that should have a veto or commish involvement. I'd rather have the Mahomes side, but without seeing the league, rosters, scoring, and depth for these guys it seems fine. Maybe the Mahomes owner also has a lack of RBs, maybe the own Wilson too, maybe they have Williams an...
- Fri May 17, 2024 1:34 pm
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1841
Re: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
Finally, here is the trade that I saw that started this thread: 10 Team SF A: Mahomes, Curtis Samuel B: KW3, Deebo, Fields I mean, that's not a trade that should have a veto or commish involvement. I'd rather have the Mahomes side, but without seeing the league, rosters, scoring, and depth for thes...
- Fri May 17, 2024 1:20 pm
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1841
Re: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
The bolded is what I was asking in starting this thread. Or rather, just asking what is it that would trigger someone to want a trade vetoed. I was thinking about this kind of on the whole and found a good thought experiment of what I think would help the discussion: When we deal with players, peop...
- Fri May 17, 2024 9:10 am
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1841
Re: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
There's gray area on how bad a trade needs to be in order to veto or determine collusion. Extreme example but say in 2021 you traded Trey Lance for a 2023 3rd. The league would go nuts. But what if that 3rd turned into Puka? This argument is one that people make ALL. THE. TIME. It is wholly illogic...
- Fri May 17, 2024 7:14 am
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1841
Re: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
There's gray area on how bad a trade needs to be in order to veto or determine collusion. Extreme example but say in 2021 you traded Trey Lance for a 2023 3rd. The league would go nuts. But what if that 3rd turned into Puka? This argument is one that people make ALL. THE. TIME. It is wholly illogic...