who would you rather own in a startup draft?
david wilson
ben tate
strat up draft question
Re: strat up draft question
Ben Tate by a country mile.
Re: strat up draft question
Yeah, Ben Tate for me as well. You know you are getting a decent flex play out of him, and has showed not only can he handle a full load, but flourish with one. Wilson may end up the better fantasy back down the road, or may never be an asset, you can't tell with rookies yet.
- tidewaterjc
- All Pro
- Posts: 1652
- Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 6:20 pm
- Location: Virginia
- Contact:
Re: strat up draft question
Tate - he has proven he can be productive
Twitter: @tidewaterjc
Email: tidewaterjc@gmail.com
Need a FF Team Helmet?
Custom FF Helmets/Banners available
http://s1324.photobucket.com/user/tidewaterjc/profile/
Email: tidewaterjc@gmail.com
Need a FF Team Helmet?
Custom FF Helmets/Banners available
http://s1324.photobucket.com/user/tidewaterjc/profile/
Re: strat up draft question
I'll side with Wilson on this one. Better pedigree and worse starter in front of him.
Waiting for rookies to show what they can do is a great way to pay a high price for them.
Waiting for rookies to show what they can do is a great way to pay a high price for them.
Re: strat up draft question
And one could argue taking rookies ahead of proven Vets is a good way to set your fantasy team back a few years. It's really all risk tolerance though. Got a couple solid starters at RB already, take a shot on Wilson. RB core a little shaky, take the known quantity in Tate.Mangelo wrote:I'll side with Wilson on this one. Better pedigree and worse starter in front of him.
Waiting for rookies to show what they can do is a great way to pay a high price for them.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 20 guests