Next move after getting Dell + Andrews...

[Randomguess]

12 team league, PPR, start 1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 1 non-QB flex for team 1 below. I just traded D Smith and Ferguson for Dell and Andrews. With the picks I have, I will take MHJ and Nabers for sure. I will have a surplus of talent at TE so I'd like to either trade Andrews or move back from the 1.04 if I decide to keep Andrews. The question is which position do I try and reinforce and with what players. I feel like at WR I am set. No one in the league seems interested in selling any of the tier 1 RBs. So, here are what I consider my options at this point. Please add any ideas if you have some.
1. Keep Andrews and trade back from 1.04 to the 1.06 or 1.08 range and take Caleb, giving me two, presumably good, young QBs. I wouldn't have to think about that position for a decade.
2. Keep Andrews and trade back from 1.04 to that same range and select Jonathan Brooks.
3. Trade Andrews and Spears or Zamir for Lamar and Engram or Godwin. This would leave the door open to still trading back at the 1.04 spot and would solidify my QB position. This owner has stated he is open to trading Lamar.
4. Trade Andrews and Spears or Zamir for Pacheco and Pickens. Then draft Bowers at 1.04.
5. Trade Andrews and Spears or Zamir for Barkley. Then draft Bowers at 1.04

These are all trades that I consider possible given the other owner's trade habits and team needs. It's a shallow league so I'm always looking to tier up where possible, but most of the elite players have been off-limits. Anyone have a strong preference for my next step? Thanks in advance.

[blueeyedbanditt]

Overall, I think you make a move to set you up for the future since you have enough solid pieces NOW to contend.
Of these, 1 is the only one I would steer away from. 3 I'm also not that interested in, I think Stroud is just fine in 1 QB.
I think 2 and 4 are my favorite options. I think if anywhere you could make a move, it's at RB. Brooks can really only go up in value IMO. Barkley getting up there in age so you'd be trading for a shorter term asset, I don't hate it though.
I think we'd all agree Bowers is the better long-term asset compared to Andrews, so I'm going to go for option 4 of those shown if you can get it done.

[Randomguess]

Overall, I think you make a move to set you up for the future since you have enough solid pieces NOW to contend.
Of these, 1 is the only one I would steer away from. 3 I'm also not that interested in, I think Stroud is just fine in 1 QB.
I think 2 and 4 are my favorite options. I think if anywhere you could make a move, it's at RB. Brooks can really only go up in value IMO. Barkley getting up there in age so you'd be trading for a shorter term asset, I don't hate it though.
I think we'd all agree Bowers is the better long-term asset compared to Andrews, so I'm going to go for option 4 of those shown if you can get it done.

Sounds good - thank you very much and I agree that 2 and 4 make the most sense for my team. Given that I have Laporta, I think Bowers makes sense, long-term IF I can get a solid return for Andrews. That being said, I am a big fan of Brooks. Will give it some time and think it all over. Thanks again.

[TheTroll]

Overall, I think you make a move to set you up for the future since you have enough solid pieces NOW to contend.
Of these, 1 is the only one I would steer away from. 3 I'm also not that interested in, I think Stroud is just fine in 1 QB.
I think 2 and 4 are my favorite options. I think if anywhere you could make a move, it's at RB. Brooks can really only go up in value IMO. Barkley getting up there in age so you'd be trading for a shorter term asset, I don't hate it though.
I think we'd all agree Bowers is the better long-term asset compared to Andrews, so I'm going to go for option 4 of those shown if you can get it done.

Sounds good - thank you very much and I agree that 2 and 4 make the most sense for my team. Given that I have Laporta, I think Bowers makes sense, long-term IF I can get a solid return for Andrews. That being said, I am a big fan of Brooks. Will give it some time and think it all over. Thanks again.

I'd lean 2 over 4 by a slight margin but both are do able.