12 team 2 QB startup

[NathanielWegman]

2 pts per completion. Rest of QB stats are “standard”

Who you taking…. Tua or Purdy?

Tua avg 49.3 and purdy avg 49.2 pts last season

I got Josh Allen at 1.02, Jonathan Taylor at 2.11 (only because the guy at 2.12 and 3.1 wouldn’t take both QBs since he got Mahomes in round 1.

Dak is in play also. He averaged 52 ppg.

He still has to make his 3.1 pick but his clock is about to expire very soon

[Menace2010]

Dak for me.

[NathanielWegman]

Dak went 3.1 right as his 8 hour clock was expiring for me to pick

[NathanielWegman]

I had the scoring wrong. Purdy was 43.9 and Tue was 43.2

I ended up settling for Tua, I feel more confident since Purdy is likely to lose one of his top 2 targets next offseason

[SoftwoodGrampian]

Dak

[Menace2010]

I'm lower on Tua than most. Health concerns are obviously true of every player, but one more concussion and he's likely donezo.

[NathanielWegman]

I'm lower on Tua than most. Health concerns are obviously true of every player, but one more concussion and he's likely donezo.

Unfortunately you’re probably correct. I already regret my decision lol

[TheTroll]

Dak for sure. He’s a better FF QB than in real life

[abloom]

This was easily tua, or in reality you should have gotten both over JT.

Don't get the one concussion and then out idea, all football players have that same situation and tua has no concussions last year.

In a true 2 QB setup both tua and purdy are more valuable than JT

[NathanielWegman]

This was easily tua, or in reality you should have gotten both over JT.

Don't get the one concussion and then out idea, all football players have that same situation and tua has no concussions last year.

In a true 2 QB setup both tua and purdy are more valuable than JT

Agree both are more valuable than JT…I probably should have went 3 QBs in round 1-3 but with only being able to start 2 and wanting to roster a young rookie QB as well, I decided to grab another starter.

Some teams actually went WR or RB in round 1 and others went round 2. 2 teams haven’t went QB yet, and they picked towards the end of round 1. The top 7 picks have all got 2 QBs, except #7 they actually went 3 QBs which Drake Maye being the round 3 pick

[abloom]

This was easily tua, or in reality you should have gotten both over JT.

Don't get the one concussion and then out idea, all football players have that same situation and tua has no concussions last year.

In a true 2 QB setup both tua and purdy are more valuable than JT

Agree both are more valuable than JT…I probably should have went 3 QBs in round 1-3 but with only being able to start 2 and wanting to roster a young rookie QB as well, I decided to grab another starter.

Some teams actually went WR or RB in round 1 and others went round 2. 2 teams haven’t went QB yet, and they picked towards the end of round 1. The top 7 picks have all got 2 QBs, except #7 they actually went 3 QBs which Drake Maye being the round 3 pick

You should always draft based on value not based on starting lineups. Especially if other teams are qb-less you want to horde the qbs

[NathanielWegman]

This was easily tua, or in reality you should have gotten both over JT.

Don't get the one concussion and then out idea, all football players have that same situation and tua has no concussions last year.

In a true 2 QB setup both tua and purdy are more valuable than JT

Agree both are more valuable than JT…I probably should have went 3 QBs in round 1-3 but with only being able to start 2 and wanting to roster a young rookie QB as well, I decided to grab another starter.

Some teams actually went WR or RB in round 1 and others went round 2. 2 teams haven’t went QB yet, and they picked towards the end of round 1. The top 7 picks have all got 2 QBs, except #7 they actually went 3 QBs which Drake Maye being the round 3 pick

You should always draft based on value not based on starting lineups. Especially if other teams are qb-less you want to horde the qbs

I agree to an extent. At the end of the day you still gotta fill out a starting lineup. The argument could be made someone will have to overpay for a QB, but at the same time someone could play hard to get for a RB or WR as well and then you get stuck over paying.

In round 4/5, im gonna grab another WR/RB, with an additional QB, if one falls back to me, which right now seems like someone could fall into my lap

[abloom]

Agree both are more valuable than JT…I probably should have went 3 QBs in round 1-3 but with only being able to start 2 and wanting to roster a young rookie QB as well, I decided to grab another starter.

Some teams actually went WR or RB in round 1 and others went round 2. 2 teams haven’t went QB yet, and they picked towards the end of round 1. The top 7 picks have all got 2 QBs, except #7 they actually went 3 QBs which Drake Maye being the round 3 pick

You should always draft based on value not based on starting lineups. Especially if other teams are qb-less you want to horde the qbs

I agree to an extent. At the end of the day you still gotta fill out a starting lineup. The argument could be made someone will have to overpay for a QB, but at the same time someone could play hard to get for a RB or WR as well and then you get stuck over paying.

In round 4/5, im gonna grab another WR/RB, with an additional QB, if one falls back to me, which right now seems like someone could fall into my lap

You can field a team with older vet rbs and wrs.

Mostert, Edwards, Gus bus have been great cheap vet rbs. Wrs are the same way. QBs though, you're always going to be paying for them especially if you're trying to acquire a QB without giving one up.

And again a true start 2qb is different than a SF. You don't want to be taking zeroes.

[NathanielWegman]

You should always draft based on value not based on starting lineups. Especially if other teams are qb-less you want to horde the qbs

I agree to an extent. At the end of the day you still gotta fill out a starting lineup. The argument could be made someone will have to overpay for a QB, but at the same time someone could play hard to get for a RB or WR as well and then you get stuck over paying.

In round 4/5, im gonna grab another WR/RB, with an additional QB, if one falls back to me, which right now seems like someone could fall into my lap

You can field a team with older vet rbs and wrs.

Mostert, Edwards, Gus bus have been great cheap vet rbs. Wrs are the same way. QBs though, you're always going to be paying for them especially if you're trying to acquire a QB without giving one up.

And again a true start 2qb is different than a SF. You don't want to be taking zeroes.

Very true. I’ve got my 2 younger QBs (Allen,Tua) I’ll add another in round 4/5. We just had a run on QBs again, but some value is still left, plus a few of the sophomore/rookies are left.

[Menace2010]

I think most people on the forum just hate the JT in the second pick. If you wanted to pivot off QB, fine, but should have targeted a WR then because of positional longevity. I'm also out on Tua, but that's a me thing.

Dak + WR or another QB would have been my favorite. Too late now, keep moving forward. Given JT's window, you need to be a contender, so prioritize production over youth of players in the same tier the rest of the way.