Chase for 1.02 +

[Last Place]

League in signature. If you own Chase, how much more over the 1.02 would it take for you to move him?

[TheTroll]

Another high first at least. Prob one more first (random) too.

I don’t see Chase in your sig or the 1.02 so if you could clarify that it would help.

[Last Place]

Another high first at least. Prob one more first (random) too.

I don’t see Chase in your sig or the 1.02 so if you could clarify that it would help.

Sorry, this is for another league not in my signature. Same exact setup though. I have the 1.02.

[TheTroll]

Another high first at least. Prob one more first (random) too.

I don’t see Chase in your sig or the 1.02 so if you could clarify that it would help.

Sorry, this is for another league not in my signature. Same exact setup though. I have the 1.02.

The equivalent of 3 firsts with two being early

[Injury Prone]

In a start 12, I do like the idea of moving Chase for quality depth. I’m in a start 13 league, and it’s harder to get ‘perceived’ value back for elite receivers though. We all expect an overpay for studs, but savvy owners should hesitate spending a lot of capital for a WR in a SF, TE prem, start 12+ league.

Agree with Troll - The usual going rate of 3 firsts (or comparable vets) comes to mind. I’d want 2 of them to be high firsts. Are you buying or selling?

[Stone2987]

Agree with assessments above, or a slight tier down and 1.02. Something like AJB, Wilson, ARSB, etc. Chase gives you a week to week advantage against almost every team you play in your wr1 slot and still has the potential to become even more valuable if/when Higgins moves on.

[tstafford]

Agree with assessments above, or a slight tier down and 1.02. Something like AJB, Wilson, ARSB, etc. Chase gives you a week to week advantage against almost every team you play in your wr1 slot and still has the potential to become even more valuable if/when Higgins moves on.

This. And if it's me I want the tier down not the all picks option. Give me ARSB/1.02 and I'm shipping Chase.

[abloom]

I'd need the 1.01 or more likely the 1.03

[Black Adam]

Another high first at least. Prob one more first (random) too.

I don’t see Chase in your sig or the 1.02 so if you could clarify that it would help.

Sorry, this is for another league not in my signature. Same exact setup though. I have the 1.02.

The equivalent of 3 firsts with two being early

^This, in players or picks for me.

[The.Big.Spank]

Good luck with the above advice. Whether it is right or wrong, I doubt somebody that has a chance at MHj or Nabors is going to add another very early first and another first on top of that.

MHj and Nabors are not prospects in the range of Addison, Burkes, Watson, etc.

[mzkp54]

Good luck with the above advice. Whether it is right or wrong, I doubt somebody that has a chance at MHj or Nabors is going to add another very early first and another first on top of that.

MHj and Nabors are not prospects in the range of Addison, Burkes, Watson, etc.

Agree with this.

[wickerkat1212]

I don't move Chase. Period. He's a WR you build your team around. I'd need not just picks but players. So 1.02 + Waddle + probably another first.

[Black Adam]

Good luck with the above advice. Whether it is right or wrong, I doubt somebody that has a chance at MHj or Nabors is going to add another very early first and another first on top of that.

MHj and Nabors are not prospects in the range of Addison, Burkes, Watson, etc.

That's fine, I wouldn't feel compelled to move Chase in the first place. Unlike some folks on here, I don't usually move cornerstone players and I never do so for the cheap.

OP simply asked what it would take for me to move Chase in addition to the 1.02, I never said he'd like the price.