1.04 OR Deshaun Watson and Zach Charbonnet (Poll)

[bridger32]

12 Team Superflex TE Premium League - Team in Signature 1

I just traded Watson and Charbonnet for 1.04.

Thoughts?

[bridger32]

12 Team Superflex TE Premium League - Team in Signature 1

I just traded Watson and Charbonnet for 1.04.

Thoughts?

My thought process is I get Nabers is add to Ceedee, Chase and AJ Brown (which is all I have/no depth).

[TheTroll]

I get the allure of this but you are now in a 12 tm SF left with Lamar and ARich only QBs? Now you have zero depth at QB unless you aren’t showing your other backend roster. I guess pick your poison. Love the WR room for sure. Just wanting to know your strategy for QB3

[tstafford]

I'm unwilling to roster Watson in any format so I love this deal.

[bridger32]

I get the allure of this but you are now in a 12 tm SF left with Lamar and ARich only QBs? Now you have zero depth at QB unless you aren’t showing your other backend roster. I guess pick your poison. Love the WR room for sure. Just wanting to know your strategy for QB3

Yea good point. I have Jimmy G, so not a ton of depth at QB... I got 3rd last year while I literally did not have a WR to start for a lot of weeks (we need to start 3 and can start up to 5). So I guess that is top of mind, though I could be in the same position with QB this year. Just need some depth!

[Mtt33]

I’m surpised this is the Watson side in the poll… Take 1.04 and fill qb3 later… or only fill it if there’s an injury. I would absolutely not pass on a great deal because of qb3.

If Nabers goes before you, you get the #2 qb anyways who is >>> Watson value wise

[tstafford]

I get the allure of this but you are now in a 12 tm SF left with Lamar and ARich only QBs? Now you have zero depth at QB unless you aren’t showing your other backend roster. I guess pick your poison. Love the WR room for sure. Just wanting to know your strategy for QB3

Yea good point. I have Jimmy G, so not a ton of depth at QB... I got 3rd last year while I literally did not have a WR to start for a lot of weeks (we need to start 3 and can start up to 5). So I guess that is top of mind, though I could be in the same position with QB this year. Just need some depth!

Might be worth considering trading for Flacco. If AR goes down, he's a surefire weekly starter in SF. And I bet he is cheaper to get than the crappy QB3 guys like Carr or Geno.

[bridger32]

I get the allure of this but you are now in a 12 tm SF left with Lamar and ARich only QBs? Now you have zero depth at QB unless you aren’t showing your other backend roster. I guess pick your poison. Love the WR room for sure. Just wanting to know your strategy for QB3

Yea good point. I have Jimmy G, so not a ton of depth at QB... I got 3rd last year while I literally did not have a WR to start for a lot of weeks (we need to start 3 and can start up to 5). So I guess that is top of mind, though I could be in the same position with QB this year. Just need some depth!

Might be worth considering trading for Flacco. If AR goes down, he's a surefire weekly starter in SF. And I bet he is cheaper to get than the crappy QB3 guys like Carr or Geno.

Good idea!

[TheTroll]

Yea good point. I have Jimmy G, so not a ton of depth at QB... I got 3rd last year while I literally did not have a WR to start for a lot of weeks (we need to start 3 and can start up to 5). So I guess that is top of mind, though I could be in the same position with QB this year. Just need some depth!

Might be worth considering trading for Flacco. If AR goes down, he's a surefire weekly starter in SF. And I bet he is cheaper to get than the crappy QB3 guys like Carr or Geno.

Good idea!

I agree... in SF don't leave yourself with only 2 viable starters

[The.Big.Spank]

I’m surpised this is the Watson side in the poll… Take 1.04 and fill qb3 later… or only fill it if there’s an injury. I would absolutely not pass on a great deal because of qb3.

If Nabers goes before you, you get the #2 qb anyways who is >>> Watson value wise

This is where I am at too. I can't believe people think having a QB3 is that important. I would trade any of my QB3's for Nabors....unless my QB3 was Burrow or TLaw, someone like that, but Watson, meh.

[murphysxm]

I am in between the "Can't be this thin at QB3" and the "would trade my QB3 all day for Nabers" teams. For me it is pretty situational. I am admittedly very anti Watson, so would take this risk. On top of being a scumbag, I think his days of being a value to covet are over.

[bridger32]

I’m surpised this is the Watson side in the poll… Take 1.04 and fill qb3 later… or only fill it if there’s an injury. I would absolutely not pass on a great deal because of qb3.

If Nabers goes before you, you get the #2 qb anyways who is >>> Watson value wise

Exactly. If Nabers goes at 3, I take the QB2 of the draft which should have more value than Watson for a couple years at least.

[Tvols]

Watson sucks I like the trade, well done.