Re: Would drafting MHJ/Nabers/Odunze be crazy?
Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 12:05 pm
right there are only 32 of those suckers (Starting QBs), they are like gold
https://forum.dynastyleaguefootball.com/
https://forum.dynastyleaguefootball.com/viewtopic.php?t=241729
Thanks for the well thought out response!tstafford wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 3:13 am Your strategy is fine. But I'd be open to adjusting it based on landing spots/draft capital. Just a few thoughts for consideration:
CW - I'm assuming based on your post that you are fairly sure CW is going 1.01. If the 1.01 ends up as a WR, I'm for sure taking CW.
Bowers - You mention this is a TEP league. If (and only if) Bowers lands well, he's worth consideration in the top-4. In 0.5 TEP 6 of the top-24 pass catchers were TEs last year. Even a light TEP makes TE attractive at flex and it sounds like this league has deep starting requirements. I have no interest in Bowers at this price in non-TEP. I'm probably still going WR3 or QB in TEP, but it's worth spending a few cycles considering Bowers.
Sell some picks - I love that you acquired all these picks and bet they have risen in value (and will continue to). During the draft I'm probably putting some late 1sts/early 2nds on the block to see what kind of offers I get. You're going to have plenty of exposure to this rookie class, rookie fever will be in full swing, and people will be frustrated that they aren't participating in the early part of the draft (because you have most of the picks). It's a recipe for you to get a great return. If you don't like the offers, reject them and pick.
WR3 vs. QB - If you end up taking two WRs, it's hard not to consider a QB with the 1.04. In the right situation, Jayden Daniels looks to have the profile of a QB that could be very valuable for FF. Honestly I could see why some folks might prefer him to CW. Higher risk, higher potential reward. You can't have too many QBs in SF. But I know trades can be hard to pull off in some leagues. FWIW - I have the 1.01/1.05 in a league where I hold Murray/Tua/Carr/etc. and I'll likely be taking CW at 1.01. MHJR would be a day one starter for me, but I'll pass on that for the QB value.
Not in my SF leagues.
I don't agree with that due to the difference in contracts.Menace2010 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 1:17 am I'm onboard with going WR-WR but then think you gotta go QB. Watson could be in a Russel Wilson boat as early as next year. I'm sky high on Lawrence, but even I will be concerned if he doesn't take a step this year. You can never have too many quality QBs. I'm low on McCarthy so this influences my recommendation. Would rather Daniels or Maye and Thomas than Odunze and McCarthy personally. This is even more true if you end up going WR again at 1.12.
I'd at least leave open the possibility of going RB at 1.12 if Brooks or Benson end up in prime spots, and would definitely take multiple RB shots (Brooks, Benson, Wright) in the early 2nd. Guys aren't elite, but plenty of WRs bust and despite the depth of this class none of the profiles are squeaky clean at that stage of the draft.
For me, there is no way to draft that undisputed stud.
There will be dudes looking for QB at 1.06 and 1.07.Ktmjelde wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 6:15 am I love it, but i would probably look to trade down to accumulate more.. I would imagine there are some folks with picks right after that are in need of a QB.. make them put their money where their mouth is a allude that you are going to dominate the QB Market.. Even if they are throwing in some 2nds you would prob still end up with those same WRs..