Offer from the 1.02

[wickerkat1212]

So, I already traded away a LOT (probably too much) to get the 1.01 in my 1 qb, 12-man, 1 ppr league.
I was in 1st/2nd all last year, and then crapped the bed after the bye week. Came in 4th.
The guy with the 1.02 made me an offer, but I feel like I'd really kill my team with this.
Bad offer? Don't have the depth now?

Dynasty #3 in signature, but my starters are now–

Allen (Pickett)
Kamara, Jacobs/ZWhite (Warren, Ford, GEdwards)
Lamb, Puka, DJM, Olave/Harrison (Tillman, ATP, TMarshall, Iosivas, VJefferson, TTucker)
Ferguson (Kraft, Schoon, ISmith, Washington)
K
D

He offered

RWilson + Hodgins + Toney + 1.02 + 2.01 + 4.02
for
Puka + Olave + ATPerry

Easy pass, right?
The reason I overpaid to get the 1.01 was I wanted to keep Puka.
So I can't see giving him up for Nabers.

[Menace2010]

It's essentially Nabers and 2.01 for Puka and Olave. I couldn't smash decline fast enough.

[wickerkat1212]

It's essentially Nabers and 2.01 for Puka and Olave. I couldn't smash decline fast enough.

Right. That's my take on it, too. I was trying to see if there was a counter. Puka for the 1.02/Sutton or something. I'm not giving both of those guys for Nabers hoping he turns into one of those guys. I think he's mad I gave up a bleep ton for the 1.01 instead of to him for the 1.02. But the big difference was that I retained Puka. I was willing to trade away aging assets such as Diggs/Henry and later picks 1.09/25 late first to get the 1.01. He wouldn't bite.

[bridger32]

It's essentially Nabers and 2.01 for Puka and Olave. I couldn't smash decline fast enough.

X2

[CGW]

I think you put the 1.01 in the trade where you meant 1.02, but that doesn't change that it's a horrible trade offer. Easy decline, no counter necessary.

[wickerkat1212]

I think you put the 1.01 in the trade where you meant 1.02, but that doesn't change that it's a horrible trade offer. Easy decline, no counter necessary.

Yes, thanks.

[TheTroll]

I think you put the 1.01 in the trade where you meant 1.02, but that doesn't change that it's a horrible trade offer. Easy decline, no counter necessary.

Yes, thanks.

As much as I LOVE Nabers, that asking price is too high.

[wickerkat1212]

I think you put the 1.01 in the trade where you meant 1.02, but that doesn't change that it's a horrible trade offer. Easy decline, no counter necessary.

Yes, thanks.

As much as I LOVE Nabers, that asking price is too high.

Agree.

[Jrblaha]

I like 1.2 > Puka but adding Olave to the deal for the rest of his side is awful imo

[wickerkat1212]

I like 1.2 > Puka but adding Olave to the deal for the rest of his side is awful imo

Agree. I'd consider the re-roll except Puka was pretty amazing last year. So, I HOPE Nabers will become Puka. Bird in the hand worth two in the bush, right?

[Jrblaha]

I like 1.2 > Puka but adding Olave to the deal for the rest of his side is awful imo

Agree. I'd consider the re-roll except Puka was pretty amazing last year. So, I HOPE Nabers will become Puka. Bird in the hand worth two in the bush, right?

I have 0 reasons to not believe in puka. Yet I still don’t it’s probably not logical on my end

[wickerkat1212]

I like 1.2 > Puka but adding Olave to the deal for the rest of his side is awful imo

Agree. I'd consider the re-roll except Puka was pretty amazing last year. So, I HOPE Nabers will become Puka. Bird in the hand worth two in the bush, right?

I have 0 reasons to not believe in puka. Yet I still don’t it’s probably not logical on my end

LOL right? I mean, the one thing I still think about is where I drafted him—late in the 4th. Why didn't we see it earlier? So many whiffed on him. There is always the theory that Stafford is a King-maker.

[Finfansteve]

I like 1.2 > Puka but adding Olave to the deal for the rest of his side is awful imo

Agree. I'd consider the re-roll except Puka was pretty amazing last year. So, I HOPE Nabers will become Puka. Bird in the hand worth two in the bush, right?

I have 0 reasons to not believe in puka. Yet I still don’t it’s probably not logical on my end

I agree. I have no real faith in puka myself and wouldn’t be inclined to start him if he was on my team as a result. I’d trade him for a haul now in case he gets exposed this year. I’d offer puka straight up for 1.02 and try to squeeze a little more out of him if possible or trade 1.01 to him for 1.02 and a decent amount more in addition but again I’m not a puka believer