24 1.01

[Platt22]

Team 1 in sig, offered 24 1.05/25 1st/2.07 for 1.01. Think it's enough?

I was offered Mims/25 2 for 1.08, but thinking I should keep the 1 here?

[mzkp54]

Not sure which side you’re on, but in 1 qb I’d rather have 1.01

[BradyT]

1.05, 2.07, 2025 1st isnt nearly enough for 1.01.

1.02 + two more 1st rounders, or 4 1sts(not including the 1.02 sound more likely.

[Menace2010]

Neither of those deals are remotely close for me.

[smbkrypt24]

With your team being pretty weak that may be enough. Where would you guess your team finishes this year?

[CGW]

In 1QB I'd want quite a bit more.

[BabyChark23]

1.05, 2.07, 2025 1st isnt nearly enough for 1.01.

1.02 + two more 1st rounders, or 4 1sts(not including the 1.02 sound more likely.

If I had the 1.01, I would break my finger smash accepting a trade for the 1.02 plus a first, let alone TWO!

[Mtt33]

1.05, 2.07, 2025 1st isnt nearly enough for 1.01.

1.02 + two more 1st rounders, or 4 1sts(not including the 1.02 sound more likely.

If I had the 1.01, I would break my finger smash accepting a trade for the 1.02 plus a first, let alone TWO!

Agreed. Would be very happy to trade down to 2, but not to 5!

[BradyT]

1.05, 2.07, 2025 1st isnt nearly enough for 1.01.

1.02 + two more 1st rounders, or 4 1sts(not including the 1.02 sound more likely.

If I had the 1.01, I would break my finger smash accepting a trade for the 1.02 plus a first, let alone TWO!

Dont get me wrong, it might turn out to be a good trade(1.02 + one 1st), but I think the current market says otherwise. You want the generational WR, pay the price(which is possible to get I think). Owning the 1.01 in my oldest league(1QB) I wouldnt accept 1.02 + a random 1st for it.

[BabyChark23]

1.05, 2.07, 2025 1st isnt nearly enough for 1.01.

1.02 + two more 1st rounders, or 4 1sts(not including the 1.02 sound more likely.

If I had the 1.01, I would break my finger smash accepting a trade for the 1.02 plus a first, let alone TWO!

Dont get me wrong, it might turn out to be a good trade(1.02 + one 1st), but I think the current market says otherwise. You want the generational WR, pay the price(which is possible to get I think). Owning the 1.01 in my oldest league(1QB) I wouldnt accept 1.02 + a random 1st for it.

Fair enough. I know a lot of people think MHJR is in a tier of his own. I’m not one of them. I think landing spot will be the biggest differentiator on whether Harrison or Nabers has more success in the NFL.

[Mtt33]

1.05, 2.07, 2025 1st isnt nearly enough for 1.01.

1.02 + two more 1st rounders, or 4 1sts(not including the 1.02 sound more likely.

If I had the 1.01, I would break my finger smash accepting a trade for the 1.02 plus a first, let alone TWO!

Dont get me wrong, it might turn out to be a good trade(1.02 + one 1st), but I think the current market says otherwise. You want the generational WR, pay the price(which is possible to get I think). Owning the 1.01 in my oldest league(1QB) I wouldnt accept 1.02 + a random 1st for it.

I’m not sure I agree that’s what any market says. Everywhere ive looked had Nabers very close behind Harrison (ahead in a few spots)

[SoftwoodGrampian]

1.2, 25 1st + 26 1st does it for me

[Jrblaha]

1.2, 25 1st + 26 1st does it for me

Trade calc has 1.2 + just a single 25 1st > 1.1. Idk if I’d do that (I have 1.2), I’d have to think pretty hard about it, but I surely wouldn’t add another 1st on top

[SoftwoodGrampian]

1.2, 25 1st + 26 1st does it for me

Trade calc has 1.2 + just a single 25 1st > 1.1. Idk if I’d do that (I have 1.2), I’d have to think pretty hard about it, but I surely wouldn’t add another 1st on top

Exactly!

[Mtt33]

1.2, 25 1st + 26 1st does it for me

Trade calc has 1.2 + just a single 25 1st > 1.1. Idk if I’d do that (I have 1.2), I’d have to think pretty hard about it, but I surely wouldn’t add another 1st on top

Don’t do it!