I wouldn't do this. What if Nabers goes earlier? I wouldn't consider moving Love at this point for an early first. I'd need 2 to consider it.MacDaddy123 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 20, 2024 4:14 pm Curious as to what folks here think of Love's trade value.
In a 12 team SF TEP PPR league, start 11. My team is mid, finished 6th in 2023.
Team strengths are QB, Mahomes, Kyler, Love, and TE, Kelce, Andrews, Hockenson, Musgrave.
Team weaknesses are RB, Kamara, Aaron Jones, Charbonnet, and WR, Godwin, C. Kirk, Boyd.
The owner of the 1.04 just put his pick OTB. I am a huge fan of Malik Nabers.
Would you trade Jordan Love, the 3.08 and 4.08 for the 1.04 and the 2.04?
Jordan Love: Superflex talk
-
- GOAT
- Posts: 27263
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 1:03 am
Re: Jordan Love: Superflex talk
"You're a creep. You got caught.." -Dan Patrick
-
- Player of the Year
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 12:51 pm
Re: Jordan Love: Superflex talk
Season is over now, what do we think? Somewhere between QB9-13 feels right to me, I'll personally take him over Tua, Purdy, Lawrence, Dak and Richardson. Behind the usual suspects, Stroud, Herbert, and Hurts.
The efficiency metrics seem unsustainable and teams will have tape on him next year, but I think the team around him is likely to improve.
The efficiency metrics seem unsustainable and teams will have tape on him next year, but I think the team around him is likely to improve.
Re: Jordan Love: Superflex talk
I'd take Allen, Jackson, Mahomes, Hurts and Stroud over him. I think it's debatable after that. Same range as Herbert, Purdy and Burrow to me. Murray is a wildcard (only the gamblers among us would take him this high). And I want Love over AR, T.Law, etc.JoshGordonsDealer wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 6:58 am Season is over now, what do we think? Somewhere between QB9-13 feels right to me, I'll personally take him over Tua, Purdy, Lawrence, Dak and Richardson. Behind the usual suspects, Stroud, Herbert, and Hurts.
The efficiency metrics seem unsustainable and teams will have tape on him next year, but I think the team around him is likely to improve.
Re: Jordan Love: Superflex talk
This seems about right. I’d still have Herbert and Burrow ahead, but it’s not by much. Love would be just ahead of Purdy for me.tstafford wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 8:27 amI'd take Allen, Jackson, Mahomes, Hurts and Stroud over him. I think it's debatable after that. Same range as Herbert, Purdy and Burrow to me. Murray is a wildcard (only the gamblers among us would take him this high). And I want Love over AR, T.Law, etc.JoshGordonsDealer wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 6:58 am Season is over now, what do we think? Somewhere between QB9-13 feels right to me, I'll personally take him over Tua, Purdy, Lawrence, Dak and Richardson. Behind the usual suspects, Stroud, Herbert, and Hurts.
The efficiency metrics seem unsustainable and teams will have tape on him next year, but I think the team around him is likely to improve.
Agree on TLaw. Arich is a little tougher, but I do have concerns with injuries for him because of how banged up he already was in such a short time in the league. So I’d lean Love there as well.
Re: Jordan Love: Superflex talk
Nailed itJoeJoe88 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 8:49 amThis seems about right. I’d still have Herbert and Burrow ahead, but it’s not by much. Love would be just ahead of Purdy for me.tstafford wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 8:27 amI'd take Allen, Jackson, Mahomes, Hurts and Stroud over him. I think it's debatable after that. Same range as Herbert, Purdy and Burrow to me. Murray is a wildcard (only the gamblers among us would take him this high). And I want Love over AR, T.Law, etc.JoshGordonsDealer wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 6:58 am Season is over now, what do we think? Somewhere between QB9-13 feels right to me, I'll personally take him over Tua, Purdy, Lawrence, Dak and Richardson. Behind the usual suspects, Stroud, Herbert, and Hurts.
The efficiency metrics seem unsustainable and teams will have tape on him next year, but I think the team around him is likely to improve.
Agree on TLaw. Arich is a little tougher, but I do have concerns with injuries for him because of how banged up he already was in such a short time in the league. So I’d lean Love there as well.
Re: Jordan Love: Superflex talk
I could understand someone wanting AR over him if they were chasing ceiling scoring.
Love is incredible at throwing, without a doubt - but he's never going to be a rusher like Allen / Lamar / Hurts. AR at least has that ceiling outcome in his range of possibilities.
Love is incredible at throwing, without a doubt - but he's never going to be a rusher like Allen / Lamar / Hurts. AR at least has that ceiling outcome in his range of possibilities.
Re: Jordan Love: Superflex talk
Yep. Without the injuries I'd have him higher on my board. For now I'm a little leery.mild wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 12:43 pm I could understand someone wanting AR over him if they were chasing ceiling scoring.
Love is incredible at throwing, without a doubt - but he's never going to be a rusher like Allen / Lamar / Hurts. AR at least has that ceiling outcome in his range of possibilities.
Along the same lines, I have Jayden Daniels higher than Maye on my SF rookie board (pending combine/draft). 1,134 rush yards (net of sacks) is pretty impressive for '23.
Re: Jordan Love: Superflex talk
1QB give me ARmild wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 12:43 pm I could understand someone wanting AR over him if they were chasing ceiling scoring.
Love is incredible at throwing, without a doubt - but he's never going to be a rusher like Allen / Lamar / Hurts. AR at least has that ceiling outcome in his range of possibilities.
SF+ give me Love
Re: Jordan Love: Superflex talk
I have seen this strategy mentioned before. But never seen an explanation to why AR is better suited for 1QB than SF+?Jigga94 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 5:32 am1QB give me ARmild wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 12:43 pm I could understand someone wanting AR over him if they were chasing ceiling scoring.
Love is incredible at throwing, without a doubt - but he's never going to be a rusher like Allen / Lamar / Hurts. AR at least has that ceiling outcome in his range of possibilities.
SF+ give me Love
Re: Jordan Love: Superflex talk
I think it’s because in 1QB you need a true difference maker to really set yourself apart from the rest of the league. Arich has the potential to be the QB1 like a Hurts or Allen due to his rushing ability.trc wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 11:23 amI have seen this strategy mentioned before. But never seen an explanation to why AR is better suited for 1QB than SF+?Jigga94 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 5:32 am1QB give me ARmild wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 12:43 pm I could understand someone wanting AR over him if they were chasing ceiling scoring.
Love is incredible at throwing, without a doubt - but he's never going to be a rusher like Allen / Lamar / Hurts. AR at least has that ceiling outcome in his range of possibilities.
SF+ give me Love
Love is likely safer, albeit has a lower ceiling.
Re: Jordan Love: Superflex talk
Jordan Love has solidified his spot as a backend QB 1 but needs to clean up his mechanics still. He's fallen in love with the off platform throws so much that he seldom settles in to plant his feet and drive throws into traffic. That split second helps his WRs yac & keeps them safer from getting lit up.
The MVP of the Packers was whomever created the game plans. Like Ben Johnson w/ the Lions the GB play caller(s) were on fire in creating space for the passing game & spreading it around to multiple receivers. Then when you add Love creating 3-4 plays off platform you have a great chance you are putting up 30 points while giving your defense a rest. Also that makes the opponents more predictable if they are playing to match points.
Next year if Love shows as much improvement as this year then he could join the top tier guys. But the NFL is league of adjustment to take away what your tendency is so we will see what happens. Definitely a rising
The MVP of the Packers was whomever created the game plans. Like Ben Johnson w/ the Lions the GB play caller(s) were on fire in creating space for the passing game & spreading it around to multiple receivers. Then when you add Love creating 3-4 plays off platform you have a great chance you are putting up 30 points while giving your defense a rest. Also that makes the opponents more predictable if they are playing to match points.
Next year if Love shows as much improvement as this year then he could join the top tier guys. But the NFL is league of adjustment to take away what your tendency is so we will see what happens. Definitely a rising
Re: Jordan Love: Superflex talk
You need that in SF too?
My thinking is that you need difference makers in most leagues. I could see a preference for stability if you go into full idp or with start 12+ offensive players.
Re: Jordan Love: Superflex talk
IMO it’s a combination of ceiling and replacement cost. In 1 QB if your high ceiling guy happens to bust, replacement cost to try again is much lower. SF is generally not as easy to add a QB unless you have a high draft pick.trc wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:26 pmYou need that in SF too?
My thinking is that you need difference makers in most leagues. I could see a preference for stability if you go into full idp or with start 12+ offensive players.
Re: Jordan Love: Superflex talk
I had a response typed up but you nailed it. Replacement cost is much cheaper in 1QB.frerichs5 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:37 pmIMO it’s a combination of ceiling and replacement cost. In 1 QB if your high ceiling guy happens to bust, replacement cost to try again is much lower. SF is generally not as easy to add a QB unless you have a high draft pick.
Think of a league where you only had to start 1 RB or WR. People would swing for the difference makers and devalue the rest
Re: Jordan Love: Superflex talk
Makes perfectly sense, thank you.frerichs5 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:37 pmIMO it’s a combination of ceiling and replacement cost. In 1 QB if your high ceiling guy happens to bust, replacement cost to try again is much lower. SF is generally not as easy to add a QB unless you have a high draft pick.