Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
- Dynasty DeLorean
- Degenerate
- Posts: 8925
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 8:45 am
Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
Last edited by Dynasty DeLorean on Sat Mar 04, 2023 9:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
In 1QB as well.
Team
1Q|2R|3W|1T|2FLX - 12 Team PPR
QB: Love, AR, Cousins, Flacco
RB: CMC, Bijan, Ford, Mitchell, Pierce, Kendre, Tucker
WR: Deebo, Wilson, Olave, Puka, Flowers, Addison, Jeudy, Jamo, Burks
TE: McBride, Kincaid, Fant, Bellinger
1Q|2R|3W|1T|2FLX - 12 Team PPR
QB: Love, AR, Cousins, Flacco
RB: CMC, Bijan, Ford, Mitchell, Pierce, Kendre, Tucker
WR: Deebo, Wilson, Olave, Puka, Flowers, Addison, Jeudy, Jamo, Burks
TE: McBride, Kincaid, Fant, Bellinger
- Dynasty DeLorean
- Degenerate
- Posts: 8925
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 8:45 am
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
Dynasty startup 1.01.
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
My rankings:
ARich
Kincaid
Mayer
ARich
Kincaid
Mayer
-
- Role Player
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:52 am
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
Jokes aside, his upside is legit “highest scoring QB ever”. He could be a bust too and I have no problems if that’s how it plays out. He’s worth the risk, both in fantasy and real life. Especially fantasy though.
-
- MVP
- Posts: 2573
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 1:09 pm
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
He's going to make a really good WR.
-
- Ring of Fame
- Posts: 3904
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 7:12 am
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
It’s odd that people in several threads are astounded by his measurables and are moving him up because of them. Everyone knew he was a great athlete. That’s not where the shortcomings are in his QB game. All the passing issues still remain.
Last edited by Bronco Billy on Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Captain
- Posts: 769
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2018 1:26 pm
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
How condescendingly dismissiveBronco Billy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 7:44 pm It’s odd that people in several threads are astounded by his measurables and are moving him up because of them. Everyone knew he was a great athlete. That’s not where the shortcomings are in his QB game. All the passing issues still remain. Maybe a team can invert the veer option and he can pick up passing yards by lateraling forward.
-
- Degenerate
- Posts: 7557
- Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 11:53 pm
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
I don't know about astounded, but agree overall. An athlete showing off how athletic he is isn't stunning.Bronco Billy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 7:44 pm It’s odd that people in several threads are astounded by his measurables and are moving him up because of them. Everyone knew he was a great athlete. That’s not where the shortcomings are in his QB game. All the passing issues still remain.
Daniel Jeremiah spoke with two teams not in the market for a QB and both put him as their #2 QB.
League #1- 14 tm ppr, 1Q, 2R, 3W, 1T, 1 R/W/T, 1K
1 DT, 2 DE, 2 LB, 1 CB, 1 S, 1 flex
League #2- 12 team PPR, 1Q, 1R, 2W, 1T, 1 R/W/T, 1 W/R/T, 1 Def
League #3- 12 tm PPR, 1Q, 0R (yes, ZERO RB) 3W, 1T, 2 R/W/T flex, 1 Def
1 DT, 2 DE, 2 LB, 1 CB, 1 S, 1 flex
League #2- 12 team PPR, 1Q, 1R, 2W, 1T, 1 R/W/T, 1 W/R/T, 1 Def
League #3- 12 tm PPR, 1Q, 0R (yes, ZERO RB) 3W, 1T, 2 R/W/T flex, 1 Def
- Dynasty DeLorean
- Degenerate
- Posts: 8925
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 8:45 am
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
Always been a pet peeve of mine on that aspect
1) While I agree that double counting isn’t ideal, I do believe there is added value in a confirmation of something.
2) specifically regarding Anthony Goaterson, he didn’t just test pretty good athletically, he tested as arguably the most athletic qb of all time. There’s a difference.
1) While I agree that double counting isn’t ideal, I do believe there is added value in a confirmation of something.
2) specifically regarding Anthony Goaterson, he didn’t just test pretty good athletically, he tested as arguably the most athletic qb of all time. There’s a difference.
-
- Ring of Fame
- Posts: 3904
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 7:12 am
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
@ the bolded.Dynasty DeLorean wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:47 pm 2) specifically regarding Anthony Goaterson, he didn’t just test pretty good athletically, he tested as arguably the most athletic qb of all time. There’s a difference.
Being a great athlete is not equivalent to being a great QB. There can be a significant disconnect between the two, and I believe Richardson may be a case in point. We’ll see…
-
- Role Player
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:52 am
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
Exactly. We knew he was an incredible athlete but didn’t know he was full on cyborg. And really it doesn’t change *too much* for me as I already liked him plenty. I hadn’t really considered Where exactly I would draft him before today, but now he feels worth a late 1st in single QB leagues. Not sure about SF but you gotta at least consider him at 1.01. Don’t think that was the case prior.
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
I fundamentally hate agreeing with BB. On this I completely do. AR is not fit to play the position of QB in the NFL.Bronco Billy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 7:44 pm It’s odd that people in several threads are astounded by his measurables and are moving him up because of them. Everyone knew he was a great athlete. That’s not where the shortcomings are in his QB game. All the passing issues still remain.
I am just a guy sharing some thoughts
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
Agree, big thing for me is I dont even bother looking into QB film or anyone else's review on them. The reality is this is a total crap shoot so I just go off who the NFL says is good as far as that goes and This performance should solidify him into a top 5 draft spot with that rushing ability. Could he be trey lance sure but the upside at any non 1.1 is worth it to meskinfanjon wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:54 pm Exactly. We knew he was an incredible athlete but didn’t know he was full on cyborg. And really it doesn’t change *too much* for me as I already liked him plenty. I hadn’t really considered Where exactly I would draft him before today, but now he feels worth a late 1st in single QB leagues. Not sure about SF but you gotta at least consider him at 1.01. Don’t think that was the case prior.