Dynasty Trade Comparisons

[Anteaters]

Each pair of choices in this poll go together. 1 goes with 2, so choose ONLY 1 or 2. 3 goes with 4, so choose ONLY 3 or 4. And so on. If you do this correct, you should end up with five choices.

For instance, 1 says "E Moore is worth more than Boyd" and 2 says "Boyd is worth more than E Moore". You should choose one of those two, then move on to the decision in 3-4, then move on to the decision in 5-6, and so on.

Don't overthink too much about whether one team is in a full rebuild and the other is a Top2 contender. Assume all teams are deciding from a base that they are in the 4-7 range in their leagues.

Straight up PPR value in a 12-team dynasty draft league. No TEP. No 2QB. No auction/salary concerns. You can decide if you're looking at a now-2yr window or a 1-6yr window.

[Anteaters]

Worth More

Rereading that, it made me think I phrased it wrong. What I really meant was one player would be a better fantasy asset than the other guy. Maybe just a subtle difference, but I didn't want to have people thinking about flip-value. I wanted to get the opinion of which you would rather have/keep on your roster for the next X amount of time.

[Jigga94]

To me at least, Lamar is what you pray Fields becomes. So that's not close. Same goes for Herbert vs Jacobs. One has been a RB1 for years and the other is a good handcuff

Andrews > Pitts unless you're in a serious rebuild

E Moore > Boyd. We've seen some good flashes from Moore and I'm more confident in his upside than a guy who's a WR3 on his own team (albeit a good one). Doghouse pending

Wilson vs DK is interesting to me. Kind of a toss up or pick your preference here. As prospects, I'd have rated Wilson higher.

[Gator Sens]

The big two for me are Jackson and Andrews should be worth much more than Fields and Pitts.

[Anteaters]

To me at least, Lamar is what you pray Fields becomes. So that's not close. Same goes for Herbert vs Jacobs. One has been a RB1 for years and the other is a good handcuff

Andrews > Pitts unless you're in a serious rebuild

E Moore > Boyd. We've seen some good flashes from Moore and I'm more confident in his upside than a guy who's a WR3 on his own team (albeit a good one). Doghouse pending

Wilson vs DK is interesting to me. Kind of a toss up or pick your preference here. As prospects, I'd have rated Wilson higher.

The Herbert/Jacobs comp is almost like the EMoore/Boyd comp to me, except Jacobs has been a higher-rated RB than Boyd has been a higher-rated WR. But the comps are similar to me because in both cases we have younger players who have flashed a little talent compared to in-their-prime older players who have consistently had very good seasons.

Though I would prefer Jacobs/Boyd over the youngsters almost every time, I don't think it's a "wrong" choice for someone else to go with the youngsters. It's just that I think there's a lot of risk/hope in choosing inconsistent/unproven young talent over proven veteran production.

The DKM/Wilson comp is like that but with a better veteran against a better youngster.

The voting results are interesting.

[Anteaters]

The big two for me are Jackson and Andrews should be worth much more than Fields and Pitts.

For my teams I would prefer Jackson and Andrews. But I was surprised to see the voting turn out to be a clean sweep for both so far. Especially Pitts getting zero votes. I wonder if people are souring on Pitts from a year ago, or if the voters so far are all people who would have chosen Andrews over Pitts 16 months ago?

[Pullo Vision]

Moore v Boyd was the toughest. With Boyd the #3 WR and little chance of that changing, went with the youth that's flashed.

[Valhalla]

I went all vets. I want the proven production over the bet that the younger ones will get to that level.

[Anteaters]

Not so surprising after Sunday's big day, Fields finally got one vote as being a better fantasy option than Lamar.

Also, even with another poor game in week 10, Pitts got his first vote as well.

[lukkynumber13]

To me at least, Lamar is what you pray Fields becomes. So that's not close. Same goes for Herbert vs Jacobs. One has been a RB1 for years and the other is a good handcuff

Andrews > Pitts unless you're in a serious rebuild

E Moore > Boyd. We've seen some good flashes from Moore and I'm more confident in his upside than a guy who's a WR3 on his own team (albeit a good one). Doghouse pending

Wilson vs DK is interesting to me. Kind of a toss up or pick your preference here. As prospects, I'd have rated Wilson higher.

Yup. The Moore/Boyd comparison really made me pause and it truly would come down to “league dynamics and team trajectory. DK vs Wilson also made me think for a couple ticks, but ultimately I would never take Wilson over DK if I were doing a startup today.

The others are laughable comparisons IMO.