Andrews/Pitts counter

[evilhoudini]

Hey all! Thanks in advance for the input. I'm trying to get Pitts, got the counter above for the team below. I think it's too much, but is Pitts worth it long term? I won last year, and will definitely be competing this year. SF, no-TE premium, 10 teams.

QB: Murray, Jackson, Lance
RB: Dillon, Fournette, Jacobs, Stevenson, Singletary, Carter, Robinson, Sermon
WR: Chase, Lamb, Waddle, AJ Brown, McLaurin, Pierce, V Jones, Q Watkins, D Gray
TE: M Andrews, Kittle, Goedert, I Smith, Hooper

Picks: All 2023, + 1 extra mid 1st

I thought about countering with Andrews and my late 2023rd for Pitts, but thought it might hurt me this year too badly. Thoughts?

[Gator Sens]

This is your classic example...Pitts is simply not worth the price to acquire in most cases. Andrews is a much better TE then Pitts straight up. That may change in the future and it may not. Hold what you have here very easily.

[murphysxm]

I want to be crystal clear. Hell no. Andrews is better and still not old

[BigBawseRoss]

dont like it at all

[ESKAY]

Is anyone concerned in the coming years that Pitts will be changed to a WR? I saw somewhere that he only ran 20% of his routes from the TE position. And MFL is good at changing players positions.

[BucBuc]

Love Pitts but if this came across desk …Bye Pitts

[ColdZealDonkeyStrike]

Andrews is not better than Pitts, c'mon guys. Did you all go nuts for Tyler Higbee when he had an injury fueled historic scoring 5 weeks to end the year? Because Andrews with Miller at QB has always been a decent mid te1, and then the backup came in with eyes only for his TE and MAndrews had his Higbee run (albeit starting from a much better baseline pre run than Higbee).
Capitalizing on Andrews' run to upgrade to Pitts is a phenomenal move. You should be able to do it for a little less than this, or at least get something like a 2nd back. I'd still be fine sending a later first and Andrews for Pitts, but it's a case where trying to get more won't hurt you.

[murphysxm]

Andrews is not better than Pitts, c'mon guys. Did you all go nuts for Tyler Higbee when he had an injury fueled historic scoring 5 weeks to end the year? Because Andrews with Miller at QB has always been a decent mid te1, and then the backup came in with eyes only for his TE and MAndrews had his Higbee run (albeit starting from a much better baseline pre run than Higbee).
Capitalizing on Andrews' run to upgrade to Pitts is a phenomenal move. You should be able to do it for a little less than this, or at least get something like a 2nd back. I'd still be fine sending a later first and Andrews for Pitts, but it's a case where trying to get more won't hurt you.

Excuse me? Andrews is 26 and scored 70 more fantasy points than Pitts last year. Had 43 more targets and 41 more catches. Also 8 more TD's. Pitts is may be that next Andrews, but he is not there yet. I literally don't understand this post

[SteveMaddensShoes]

Pitts easily over Andrews straight up but for an early 1st in a non tep I’m definitely taking the Andrews side

[Gator Sens]

Andrews is not better than Pitts, c'mon guys. Did you all go nuts for Tyler Higbee when he had an injury fueled historic scoring 5 weeks to end the year? Because Andrews with Miller at QB has always been a decent mid te1, and then the backup came in with eyes only for his TE and MAndrews had his Higbee run (albeit starting from a much better baseline pre run than Higbee).
Capitalizing on Andrews' run to upgrade to Pitts is a phenomenal move. You should be able to do it for a little less than this, or at least get something like a 2nd back. I'd still be fine sending a later first and Andrews for Pitts, but it's a case where trying to get more won't hurt you.

Excuse me? Andrews is 26 and scored 70 more fantasy points than Pitts last year. Had 43 more targets and 41 more catches. Also 8 more TD's. Pitts is may be that next Andrews, but he is not there yet. I literally don't understand this post

I am with you...I am not following at all.

[Edgy68]

Maybe if it was Kittle and the 1st, but you don’t need both Pitts and Andrews. That 1st will gain value, while Pitts is valued pretty highly already. I think the consensus says “hold”.

[Trevormortis]

Not even close. Andrews and Pitts are near equal and a 2023 1st on top? heck yea.