James Cook

General talk about Dynasty Leagues.
Ice
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6622
Joined: Tue May 22, 2018 6:17 pm

Re: James Cook

Postby Ice » Mon Aug 01, 2022 8:27 am

murphysxm wrote: Mon Aug 01, 2022 8:21 am
Ice wrote: Mon Aug 01, 2022 7:49 am
I remember a bunch of us liked CEH situation just like people like Moore’s, or Pickens today.

My take is Cook has the clearest path to quality touches. He should get a ton of receptions and plenty of carries as a rookie.
Are you saying that Cook has a clearer path to touches than Moore or Pickens? Production aside, I don't see this as even remotely possible.

That’s exactly what I am saying, Between Rushing and Receiving Cook should get more touches easily.
The Clock is Running and there are no Timeouts

Cameron Giles
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 14282
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:06 pm

Re: James Cook

Postby Cameron Giles » Mon Aug 01, 2022 9:17 am

FiremanEd wrote: Mon Aug 01, 2022 7:29 am Most of those guys had careers. I don’t think the debate is whether he flames out, but rather the ability for him to be a high quality fantasy producer. As a good pass catcher in a good O he can. But, he isn’t a guy I see as a RB1 caliber player. He could put up a RB1 season, but he’s more of the Vereen type than a guy who will get regular workload and goal line opportunity. He’s more CEH than Kamara/CMC (not elite talent, and more situation).
Vereen is a very reasonable expectation in terms of result. Maybe even 2017 Duke Johnson.

Backs like this are a dime a dozen though.

j4pac
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1292
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2021 3:52 pm

Re: James Cook

Postby j4pac » Mon Aug 01, 2022 9:26 am

Cameron Giles wrote: Mon Aug 01, 2022 9:17 am
FiremanEd wrote: Mon Aug 01, 2022 7:29 am Most of those guys had careers. I don’t think the debate is whether he flames out, but rather the ability for him to be a high quality fantasy producer. As a good pass catcher in a good O he can. But, he isn’t a guy I see as a RB1 caliber player. He could put up a RB1 season, but he’s more of the Vereen type than a guy who will get regular workload and goal line opportunity. He’s more CEH than Kamara/CMC (not elite talent, and more situation).
Vereen is a very reasonable expectation in terms of result. Maybe even 2017 Duke Johnson.

Backs like this are a dime a dozen though.
If Cook wasnt drafted in the 2nd round by the Bills or didn’t have the last name Cook, where would he get drafted in dynasty? I honestly think that he would go about where Anthony McFarland was drafted in dynasty. He’s a solid receiver…but typically highly productive receiving backs can break tackles. I’m just not convinced that he will be slipping tackles at the NFL level. That’s really the difference between Shane Vereen and Alvin Kamara/Dalvin Cook/McCaffrey.
SF, PPR, 12 team, 12 player dynasty

QB- Lawrence, Fields, Tannehill (max 2 keepers, 3 rostered)
RB- Bijan Robinson, T Pollard, Allgeier, Charbonnet, Achane, J Wilson, Kelley, K Williams
WR- Lamb, Jeudy, Hill, C Olave, A Pierce, Shaheed, Bourne
TE- Goedert, Musgrave

User avatar
murphysxm
Degenerate
Degenerate
Posts: 7719
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 8:10 am

Re: James Cook

Postby murphysxm » Mon Aug 01, 2022 10:01 am

Ice wrote: Mon Aug 01, 2022 8:27 am

That’s exactly what I am saying, Between Rushing and Receiving Cook should get more touches easily.
Let’s mark this and see who gets to take the victory lap
I am just a guy sharing some thoughts

Ice
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6622
Joined: Tue May 22, 2018 6:17 pm

Re: James Cook

Postby Ice » Mon Aug 01, 2022 10:27 am

j4pac wrote: Mon Aug 01, 2022 9:26 am
Cameron Giles wrote: Mon Aug 01, 2022 9:17 am
FiremanEd wrote: Mon Aug 01, 2022 7:29 am Most of those guys had careers. I don’t think the debate is whether he flames out, but rather the ability for him to be a high quality fantasy producer. As a good pass catcher in a good O he can. But, he isn’t a guy I see as a RB1 caliber player. He could put up a RB1 season, but he’s more of the Vereen type than a guy who will get regular workload and goal line opportunity. He’s more CEH than Kamara/CMC (not elite talent, and more situation).
Vereen is a very reasonable expectation in terms of result. Maybe even 2017 Duke Johnson.

Backs like this are a dime a dozen though.
If Cook wasnt drafted in the 2nd round by the Bills or didn’t have the last name Cook, where would he get drafted in dynasty? I honestly think that he would go about where Anthony McFarland was drafted in dynasty. He’s a solid receiver…but typically highly productive receiving backs can break tackles. I’m just not convinced that he will be slipping tackles at the NFL level. That’s really the difference between Shane Vereen and Alvin Kamara/Dalvin Cook/McCaffrey.
Cook was drafted not because of his name but because of the process.

He has great tape that show speed burst, quickness, hands, and vision.

He had a great season on the best college team in the country.

Obviously there is no telling on hypothetical situations.

That said, drafting for fantasy is all about one’s view of talent and situation. Most of us I would think would place some value on pedigree as players that have family most likely get an inside perspective on what it really takes.
The Clock is Running and there are no Timeouts

ericanadian
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6519
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 12:13 pm

Re: James Cook

Postby ericanadian » Mon Aug 01, 2022 10:35 am

I guess what gives me pause here is that all the guys being thrown out as comparables (Vereen, Duke, CEH, etc), while similar size each ran the 40 at about a full tenth of a second slower than Cook did. That’s significant for big play capability.

Now, Cook could struggle to stay healthy either way and I think that’s the biggest hurdle here (even with CMC it’s been a fairly major problem), but I think the difference between a 4.4 back and a 4.5 back is pretty significant in terms of big play ability.

Skyy Moore should be having glowing reviews before the pads come on. That’s his game. Pickens may be having great reviews, but he is still the number three receiver on a team with Mitch Trubisky as the projected starter in the short term and Kenny Pickett as the projected starter in the long term. They also pretty heavily targetted their RB and TE. Even if you’re certain that Diontae is on the way out, I’m not sure I’m getting excited about the number two receiver on that offense.

Anyways, we’ll see, but I’d be pretty happy to have Cook at the back of the top ten as I probably give him a slight edge on guys like Pickens, Moore, Pierce and Watson. I liked Metchie more than those guys too prior to the cancer diagnosis, so maybe I’m just low on them.
All I Der Is Win - 16 Team IDP League (Pass TD 6pts)

QB - Stafford, Stroud, Tune
RB - Swift, Hall, Penny, Bigsby, Ford
WR - Pittman, Olave, Di. Johnson, G. Wilson, J. Williams, Metchie, Robinson, M. Wilson
TE - Okonkwo, Schoonmaker
LB - Brooks, R. Smith, Phillips
DL - Crosby, Allen, Simmons
DB - D. James, Baker, Delpit
K - Just a stupid kicker

User avatar
killer_of_giants
Ring of Fame
Ring of Fame
Posts: 3330
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2018 8:20 am

Re: James Cook

Postby killer_of_giants » Mon Aug 01, 2022 4:29 pm

i was a bit bored by weight, ypc, injury probability and draft capital discussion, so i went back to watch some game cutouts.

cook has good vision, quick feet and fluid cuts. fast and good acceleration. behind a (very?) good line he should be able to run inside the tackles in the nfl, but won't create much on his own. good receiver, mostly in the backfield or flat, sometimes lined out wide and burning a defender, usually a linebacker. good hands, but on the whole not exactly wowing.

my issue with cook, and it's a huge one, is that if you can touch him, you can tackle him. funk, if you blow hard enough you could probably tackle him (stealing already from watson's book of parlour lines, apparently it's no big deal).
i just cannot have high hopes of fantasy success for a RB that can get hand-tackled at college level. he's fast (not crazy fast though), but his elusiveness in the open field is not good at all. he either grossly outruns his man (fast enough to make it happen... sometimes) or gets tackled.

i can certainly see him having a good nfl role with some very good games, while being a somewhat risky flex option for fantasy (maybe less risky in ppr). i don't see a very high ceiling for him, a couple of mid/low RB2 seasons is the most i would expect, and i have doubts on the floor. which makes for an interesting late 1st in most drafts. in this particular draft, i'll put my chips on 7/9 WRs before cook (may vary depending on team specifics). so yeah, late 1st seems about right, and if someone finds half of the top WRs not exciting and drafts him in the mid of the 1st, great. top 5 seems too much of a reach, but i'm the one who thought swift was a bum and a one-trick pony, so there is that.

remedy29
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1201
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2014 6:33 am
Location: New Jersey

Re: James Cook

Postby remedy29 » Mon Aug 01, 2022 6:02 pm

Cameron Giles wrote: Sun Jul 31, 2022 6:25 pm
remedy29 wrote: Sun Jul 31, 2022 5:43 pm So the 13th drafted WR, from a small school, is obviously a better prospect than the 3rd RB drafted by a team who targeted him in the second round?

That sounds completely illogical.

Has a second round drafted RB ever been so disregarded in dynasty rookie drafts???
This was a very strong WR class. 13 WRs were drafted in the first two rounds, which is up there for the most ever. This was a 2-man RB class and overall a weak group. No first rounders, only 3 went in the Top 64.

It's not that I'm saying Cook sucks; I'm saying that I wouldn't pass on an extremely productive WR to draft a complimentary RB who doesn't have a history of being anything more and his athletic profile is just ok.

To pass on Moore or Pickens for a RB, I need someone who at least has a decent chance of being a lead back and has done it before.
I disagree with the notion that 2022 is a very strong draft class for WR. In 2020, 13 WRs were drafted in the first 2 rounds. In 2021 10 were and in 2022 13 were. The 3 years prior (and probably many more) were under 10 WRs drafted in the top 2 rounds. Clearly, the trend in the NFL is to draft WRs out of team need and the changing of the NFL to an extreme passing game, not to mention the increase cost to keep veteran WRs once they are up for a new contract. The fact that 13 teams identified a need at WR and drafted a WR in 2022 does not make the 2022 draft class strong at WR.

I have the 3rd pick in one league and I am likely looking at my choice at WR. Probably going with London. I can't decide, I can't turn to consensus, because consensus can't decide and I am not all that excited with drafting any of them with a top pick.

I also drafted 11th in another league and drafted Skyy Moore as the 7th WR off the board (James Cook was already gone). I like Skyy Moore, I put him in a tier with many of the other WRs. But I did not pass on 5 WRs drafted ahead of him because this is a strong WR class, I passed on them because it is a deep/mediocre WR class. I choose Moore situation, plus I have Mahomes, over the other WRs.

I also disagree with passing on James Cook because he is a complimentary RB. They are all complimentary RBs. Give me the complimentary pass catching RB in PPR all day with a mid to late 1st rookie pick over mediocre WRs. Yes position scarcity has plenty to do with it, as was mentioned, but the positional scarcity alone is worth the draft pick over mediocre WRs.

After 12 teams (one of the most ever in the top 2 rounds) drafted a WR and passed on Skyy Moore, if it wasn't for KC with a huge need at WR, Moore may have been a 3rd round WR, as it was he was pretty close to Round 3. I am just saying, that guy should not be clearly above James Cook in dynasty drafts. If anything, he should be in the same tier with 50/50 leagues picking Cook ahead of him, which actually appears to be the case in real drafts.

Cameron Giles
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 14282
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:06 pm

Re: James Cook

Postby Cameron Giles » Mon Aug 01, 2022 7:28 pm

remedy29 wrote: Mon Aug 01, 2022 6:02 pm
Cameron Giles wrote: Sun Jul 31, 2022 6:25 pm
remedy29 wrote: Sun Jul 31, 2022 5:43 pm So the 13th drafted WR, from a small school, is obviously a better prospect than the 3rd RB drafted by a team who targeted him in the second round?

That sounds completely illogical.

Has a second round drafted RB ever been so disregarded in dynasty rookie drafts???
This was a very strong WR class. 13 WRs were drafted in the first two rounds, which is up there for the most ever. This was a 2-man RB class and overall a weak group. No first rounders, only 3 went in the Top 64.

It's not that I'm saying Cook sucks; I'm saying that I wouldn't pass on an extremely productive WR to draft a complimentary RB who doesn't have a history of being anything more and his athletic profile is just ok.

To pass on Moore or Pickens for a RB, I need someone who at least has a decent chance of being a lead back and has done it before.
I disagree with the notion that 2022 is a very strong draft class for WR. In 2020, 13 WRs were drafted in the first 2 rounds. In 2021 10 were and in 2022 13 were. The 3 years prior (and probably many more) were under 10 WRs drafted in the top 2 rounds. Clearly, the trend in the NFL is to draft WRs out of team need and the changing of the NFL to an extreme passing game, not to mention the increase cost to keep veteran WRs once they are up for a new contract. The fact that 13 teams identified a need at WR and drafted a WR in 2022 does not make the 2022 draft class strong at WR.
That's kind of how it works. If 13 teams went WR in the Top 64, that means they had strong draft grades on them to justify it. It doesn't mean it's going to go down as one of the best classes ever, but it is definitely a loaded group going into the season. It's not like they all reached randomly.

I think Moore definitely has more potential as a WR than Cook does as an RB, simply just off production profile.

SteveMaddensShoes
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5063
Joined: Sun May 03, 2015 11:28 pm

Re: James Cook

Postby SteveMaddensShoes » Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:02 pm

remedy29 wrote: Mon Aug 01, 2022 6:02 pm
Cameron Giles wrote: Sun Jul 31, 2022 6:25 pm
remedy29 wrote: Sun Jul 31, 2022 5:43 pm So the 13th drafted WR, from a small school, is obviously a better prospect than the 3rd RB drafted by a team who targeted him in the second round?

That sounds completely illogical.

Has a second round drafted RB ever been so disregarded in dynasty rookie drafts???
This was a very strong WR class. 13 WRs were drafted in the first two rounds, which is up there for the most ever. This was a 2-man RB class and overall a weak group. No first rounders, only 3 went in the Top 64.

It's not that I'm saying Cook sucks; I'm saying that I wouldn't pass on an extremely productive WR to draft a complimentary RB who doesn't have a history of being anything more and his athletic profile is just ok.

To pass on Moore or Pickens for a RB, I need someone who at least has a decent chance of being a lead back and has done it before.
I disagree with the notion that 2022 is a very strong draft class for WR. In 2020, 13 WRs were drafted in the first 2 rounds. In 2021 10 were and in 2022 13 were. The 3 years prior (and probably many more) were under 10 WRs drafted in the top 2 rounds. Clearly, the trend in the NFL is to draft WRs out of team need and the changing of the NFL to an extreme passing game, not to mention the increase cost to keep veteran WRs once they are up for a new contract. The fact that 13 teams identified a need at WR and drafted a WR in 2022 does not make the 2022 draft class strong at WR.

I have the 3rd pick in one league and I am likely looking at my choice at WR. Probably going with London. I can't decide, I can't turn to consensus, because consensus can't decide and I am not all that excited with drafting any of them with a top pick.

I also drafted 11th in another league and drafted Skyy Moore as the 7th WR off the board (James Cook was already gone). I like Skyy Moore, I put him in a tier with many of the other WRs. But I did not pass on 5 WRs drafted ahead of him because this is a strong WR class, I passed on them because it is a deep/mediocre WR class. I choose Moore situation, plus I have Mahomes, over the other WRs.

I also disagree with passing on James Cook because he is a complimentary RB. They are all complimentary RBs. Give me the complimentary pass catching RB in PPR all day with a mid to late 1st rookie pick over mediocre WRs. Yes position scarcity has plenty to do with it, as was mentioned, but the positional scarcity alone is worth the draft pick over mediocre WRs.

After 12 teams (one of the most ever in the top 2 rounds) drafted a WR and passed on Skyy Moore, if it wasn't for KC with a huge need at WR, Moore may have been a 3rd round WR, as it was he was pretty close to Round 3. I am just saying, that guy should not be clearly above James Cook in dynasty drafts. If anything, he should be in the same tier with 50/50 leagues picking Cook ahead of him, which actually appears to be the case in real drafts.
I don’t like your process of comparing wr to rb or using the 13th at a position to justify taking the rb. It’s like saying there are 13 Ferrari that were picked and and 3 Toyotas and you would prefer the 3rd Toyota because it has a higher draft capital.

I think you clarified the real problem to a degree and that’s your belief that it’s a poor/weak wr class I general and where others are seeing 13 Ferraris your are seeing 13 Hondas. And I think that’s fair. We all are trying to analyze and it’s ultimately up to you to decide which guys are actually the Ferraris.

I’d just caution that your process of comparing 13th wr to 3rd rb might be flawed. Not saying your opinion of who the better player will be is wrong. Cleaning up your process can help clean up your decision making, in my experience.
TEAM 1 - 12 man SF. ppr, TEP 1.65 ppr

11 starters - QB, RB(2) WR(3) TE, SF, Flex(3)

Stroud, Kyler, Bryce Young, Anthony Richardson, Minshew, Trey Lance, Dalton l, Mike White

Breece, Achane, AJ Dillon, Justice Hill, Evan Hull, Chris Rodgriquez

Chase, Lamb, Waddle, Olave, London Drake, Demario Davis, Jake Bobo

Kyle Pitts, Mark Andrews, Kincaid, Schoonmaker

24 picks - 1x2, 3,4,5

Team 2-
12 man SF, .25ppc, .5ppr rbs, 1 ppr wr, 1.5 ppr TE

Joe Burrow, Trevor Lawerence, Jake Haehner, Jake Browning

JT, Kendre Miller,, K Ingram, Ty Chandler, Michael Carter, Kenny Macintosh, Sean Tucker

Puka, Rondale, Mooney, Wan’dale, Terrace Marshall, DPJ, Justyn Ross, Xavier Hutchinson,

Kyle Pitts, Luke Musgrave, Juwan Johnson, Darnell Washington, Jelani Woods, Elijah Higgins


24 - 1st x 3, 2nd x 2, 4th x 3 ,5

Ice
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6622
Joined: Tue May 22, 2018 6:17 pm

Re: James Cook

Postby Ice » Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:21 pm

SteveMaddensShoes wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:02 pm
remedy29 wrote: Mon Aug 01, 2022 6:02 pm
Cameron Giles wrote: Sun Jul 31, 2022 6:25 pm

This was a very strong WR class. 13 WRs were drafted in the first two rounds, which is up there for the most ever. This was a 2-man RB class and overall a weak group. No first rounders, only 3 went in the Top 64.

It's not that I'm saying Cook sucks; I'm saying that I wouldn't pass on an extremely productive WR to draft a complimentary RB who doesn't have a history of being anything more and his athletic profile is just ok.

To pass on Moore or Pickens for a RB, I need someone who at least has a decent chance of being a lead back and has done it before.
I disagree with the notion that 2022 is a very strong draft class for WR. In 2020, 13 WRs were drafted in the first 2 rounds. In 2021 10 were and in 2022 13 were. The 3 years prior (and probably many more) were under 10 WRs drafted in the top 2 rounds. Clearly, the trend in the NFL is to draft WRs out of team need and the changing of the NFL to an extreme passing game, not to mention the increase cost to keep veteran WRs once they are up for a new contract. The fact that 13 teams identified a need at WR and drafted a WR in 2022 does not make the 2022 draft class strong at WR.

I have the 3rd pick in one league and I am likely looking at my choice at WR. Probably going with London. I can't decide, I can't turn to consensus, because consensus can't decide and I am not all that excited with drafting any of them with a top pick.

I also drafted 11th in another league and drafted Skyy Moore as the 7th WR off the board (James Cook was already gone). I like Skyy Moore, I put him in a tier with many of the other WRs. But I did not pass on 5 WRs drafted ahead of him because this is a strong WR class, I passed on them because it is a deep/mediocre WR class. I choose Moore situation, plus I have Mahomes, over the other WRs.

I also disagree with passing on James Cook because he is a complimentary RB. They are all complimentary RBs. Give me the complimentary pass catching RB in PPR all day with a mid to late 1st rookie pick over mediocre WRs. Yes position scarcity has plenty to do with it, as was mentioned, but the positional scarcity alone is worth the draft pick over mediocre WRs.

After 12 teams (one of the most ever in the top 2 rounds) drafted a WR and passed on Skyy Moore, if it wasn't for KC with a huge need at WR, Moore may have been a 3rd round WR, as it was he was pretty close to Round 3. I am just saying, that guy should not be clearly above James Cook in dynasty drafts. If anything, he should be in the same tier with 50/50 leagues picking Cook ahead of him, which actually appears to be the case in real drafts.
I don’t like your process of comparing wr to rb or using the 13th at a position to justify taking the rb. It’s like saying there are 13 Ferrari that were picked and and 3 Toyotas and you would prefer the 3rd Toyota because it has a higher draft capital.

I think you clarified the real problem to a degree and that’s your belief that it’s a poor/weak wr class I general and where others are seeing 13 Ferraris your are seeing 13 Hondas. And I think that’s fair. We all are trying to analyze and it’s ultimately up to you to decide which guys are actually the Ferraris.

I’d just caution that your process of comparing 13th wr to 3rd rb might be flawed. Not saying your opinion of who the better player will be is wrong. Cleaning up your process can help clean up your decision making, in my experience.
So what you're saying is a Toyota is only 1/100th of second slower in the 40 but is less valuable because they will get carries and receptions and played against vastly superior competition. :biggrin:

I like Moore just fine and think his game does translate but upon closer inspection, 8 of his 10 TD's came in 3 games. He had 2 catches against Michigan and Akron, and 4 catches against Nevada.

One might want to check the powerhouses in The MAC West and East. There is a big Mahomes factor with Skyy Moore no doubt.
The Clock is Running and there are no Timeouts

SteveMaddensShoes
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5063
Joined: Sun May 03, 2015 11:28 pm

Re: James Cook

Postby SteveMaddensShoes » Wed Aug 03, 2022 9:40 pm

Ice wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:21 pm
SteveMaddensShoes wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:02 pm
remedy29 wrote: Mon Aug 01, 2022 6:02 pm

I disagree with the notion that 2022 is a very strong draft class for WR. In 2020, 13 WRs were drafted in the first 2 rounds. In 2021 10 were and in 2022 13 were. The 3 years prior (and probably many more) were under 10 WRs drafted in the top 2 rounds. Clearly, the trend in the NFL is to draft WRs out of team need and the changing of the NFL to an extreme passing game, not to mention the increase cost to keep veteran WRs once they are up for a new contract. The fact that 13 teams identified a need at WR and drafted a WR in 2022 does not make the 2022 draft class strong at WR.

I have the 3rd pick in one league and I am likely looking at my choice at WR. Probably going with London. I can't decide, I can't turn to consensus, because consensus can't decide and I am not all that excited with drafting any of them with a top pick.

I also drafted 11th in another league and drafted Skyy Moore as the 7th WR off the board (James Cook was already gone). I like Skyy Moore, I put him in a tier with many of the other WRs. But I did not pass on 5 WRs drafted ahead of him because this is a strong WR class, I passed on them because it is a deep/mediocre WR class. I choose Moore situation, plus I have Mahomes, over the other WRs.

I also disagree with passing on James Cook because he is a complimentary RB. They are all complimentary RBs. Give me the complimentary pass catching RB in PPR all day with a mid to late 1st rookie pick over mediocre WRs. Yes position scarcity has plenty to do with it, as was mentioned, but the positional scarcity alone is worth the draft pick over mediocre WRs.

After 12 teams (one of the most ever in the top 2 rounds) drafted a WR and passed on Skyy Moore, if it wasn't for KC with a huge need at WR, Moore may have been a 3rd round WR, as it was he was pretty close to Round 3. I am just saying, that guy should not be clearly above James Cook in dynasty drafts. If anything, he should be in the same tier with 50/50 leagues picking Cook ahead of him, which actually appears to be the case in real drafts.
I don’t like your process of comparing wr to rb or using the 13th at a position to justify taking the rb. It’s like saying there are 13 Ferrari that were picked and and 3 Toyotas and you would prefer the 3rd Toyota because it has a higher draft capital.

I think you clarified the real problem to a degree and that’s your belief that it’s a poor/weak wr class I general and where others are seeing 13 Ferraris your are seeing 13 Hondas. And I think that’s fair. We all are trying to analyze and it’s ultimately up to you to decide which guys are actually the Ferraris.

I’d just caution that your process of comparing 13th wr to 3rd rb might be flawed. Not saying your opinion of who the better player will be is wrong. Cleaning up your process can help clean up your decision making, in my experience.
So what you're saying is a Toyota is only 1/100th of second slower in the 40 but is less valuable because they will get carries and receptions and played against vastly superior competition. :biggrin:

I like Moore just fine and think his game does translate but upon closer inspection, 8 of his 10 TD's came in 3 games. He had 2 catches against Michigan and Akron, and 4 catches against Nevada.

One might want to check the powerhouses in The MAC West and East. There is a big Mahomes factor with Skyy Moore no doubt.
Lol. I had a feeling mybexample would get nitpicked. The problem with an illustration is that it only runs on 3 legs.
TEAM 1 - 12 man SF. ppr, TEP 1.65 ppr

11 starters - QB, RB(2) WR(3) TE, SF, Flex(3)

Stroud, Kyler, Bryce Young, Anthony Richardson, Minshew, Trey Lance, Dalton l, Mike White

Breece, Achane, AJ Dillon, Justice Hill, Evan Hull, Chris Rodgriquez

Chase, Lamb, Waddle, Olave, London Drake, Demario Davis, Jake Bobo

Kyle Pitts, Mark Andrews, Kincaid, Schoonmaker

24 picks - 1x2, 3,4,5

Team 2-
12 man SF, .25ppc, .5ppr rbs, 1 ppr wr, 1.5 ppr TE

Joe Burrow, Trevor Lawerence, Jake Haehner, Jake Browning

JT, Kendre Miller,, K Ingram, Ty Chandler, Michael Carter, Kenny Macintosh, Sean Tucker

Puka, Rondale, Mooney, Wan’dale, Terrace Marshall, DPJ, Justyn Ross, Xavier Hutchinson,

Kyle Pitts, Luke Musgrave, Juwan Johnson, Darnell Washington, Jelani Woods, Elijah Higgins


24 - 1st x 3, 2nd x 2, 4th x 3 ,5

User avatar
Anteaters
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6620
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2020 9:07 am

Re: James Cook

Postby Anteaters » Tue Sep 06, 2022 1:13 pm

https://www.cbssports.com/fantasy/footb ... backfield/

Was just reading this article at CBSsportsline.com, about potential busts for the 2022 season. It's more for redraft than dynasty, but we can definitely use parts of the information for dynasty. For instance, when it mentioned Damion Pierce this was said ...
the track record of running backs with a career-high in carries in college in the low-100s isn't great.
...and that got me to thinking about James Cook, whom I was not really warming up to but was considering the possibility of taking a flyer on in one dynasty league, if the price was right.

In 4 seasons at Georgia, Cook had 41, 31, 45 and 111 carries. The same thing the article mentioned as a negative for Pierce looks to be a negative for Cook. I know, I know, Cook is more of a receiving back than a running back. So I check his receptions in college and find 8, 16, 16 and 27.

Could someone who is more of a Cook maybe-ist than a Cook truther, tell me why I should believe Cook is the special low-touch college guy who is going to become a T20 fantasy RB? I'll concede the NFL draft capital means something. Is there any other reason besides "his game film proves it."?

BONUS QUESTION: I have a redraft draft tonight. As the time comes for RB lottery swings, is there any reason to take Cook over ZWhite or even RWhite?
TEAM 1:
12 Team ppr w/20 keepers - start 1QB 2RB 3WR 1TE 1FLX 6IDP 1DEF
QB: Tua, Lamar, Levis
RB: Etienne, Pacheco, JavonteWms, JFord, CEH
WR: Lamb, JChase, Waddle, Pickens, MWilliams, Q Johnston
TE: Goedert, Friermuth
DEF: Cowboys, Ravens
IDP:(LB) Bolton, Greenlaw; (DE/DL) ZCollins, BJHill; (S/CB) Pitre, Bates, Witherspoon
2023 & 2022 Champion: 2020 third place: 2019 Champion

TEAM 2:
14 Team 30roster SF/ppr/TEP - QB/RB/WR/TE/5FLX/SF
QB: Tua, CJStroud, Carr, AOC, MWhite, Lock
RB: Etienne, Stevenson, GusE, AJD, Singletary, CEH, Spiller
WR: Amon-Ra, Kirk, Dell, Thielen, Gallup, Ch Jones
TE: Andrews, Waller, Taysom, Smythe, WMallory, JOliver
2023 semifinals loser

User avatar
mild
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5894
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2018 5:23 pm
Location: the Jalen Hurts bus

Re: James Cook

Postby mild » Tue Sep 06, 2022 3:29 pm

Anteaters wrote: Tue Sep 06, 2022 1:13 pm BONUS QUESTION: I have a redraft draft tonight. As the time comes for RB lottery swings, is there any reason to take Cook over ZWhite or even RWhite?
Rachaad White is a smash for redraft leagues (and Dynasty contenders).

Clear Number 2 to Fournette already, has pass catching upside in an offense with the GOAT, and would be a monster for an extremely talented (top 5) offense if the starter went down. A good reminder that Lenny already showed up out of shape, and is 27 with a lot of tread on the tires already.

Z-White and J-Cook have elements of those things going for them in their situations, but nothing as concrete as what Rachaad already has right now.

Pullo Vision
Degenerate
Degenerate
Posts: 7557
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 11:53 pm

Re: James Cook

Postby Pullo Vision » Tue Sep 06, 2022 3:32 pm

mild wrote: Tue Sep 06, 2022 3:29 pm
Anteaters wrote: Tue Sep 06, 2022 1:13 pm BONUS QUESTION: I have a redraft draft tonight. As the time comes for RB lottery swings, is there any reason to take Cook over ZWhite or even RWhite?
Rachaad White is a smash for redraft leagues (and Dynasty contenders).

Clear Number 2 to Fournette already, has pass catching upside in an offense with the GOAT, and would be a monster for an extremely talented (top 5) offense if the starter went down. A good reminder that Lenny already showed up out of shape, and is 27 with a lot of tread on the tires already.

Z-White and J-Cook have elements of those things going for them in their situations, but nothing as concrete as what Rachaad already has right now.
Agreed. Of the three in redraft, RWhite is clearly above the other 2 , in a different tier. Cook beats out Zamir in redraft, but I wouldn't be enthusiastic picking him.
League #1- 14 tm ppr, 1Q, 2R, 3W, 1T, 1 R/W/T, 1K
1 DT, 2 DE, 2 LB, 1 CB, 1 S, 1 flex

League #2- 12 team PPR, 1Q, 1R, 2W, 1T, 1 R/W/T, 1 W/R/T, 1 Def

League #3- 12 tm PPR, 1Q, 0R (yes, ZERO RB) 3W, 1T, 2 R/W/T flex, 1 Def


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BabyChark23, Bing [Bot], BlackOmega, Flatlander19, Forza_Azzurri, Ruggenater, Silver Fox 74 and 30 guests