The Le'Veon Bell Tolls ... To the Ravens

General talk about Dynasty Leagues.
User avatar
BlackOmega
All Pro
All Pro
Posts: 1740
Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 5:11 pm

Re: Le'Veon Bell

Postby BlackOmega » Tue Nov 13, 2018 2:04 pm

Well that's that, no Bell this season officially so let the drama of where he goes next year begin

FantasyFreak
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 27496
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 1:03 am

Re: Le'Veon Bell

Postby FantasyFreak » Tue Nov 13, 2018 2:09 pm

I don't buy the Indy narrative, Mack has looked really good and they have other positions of priority on their defense and at WR. I think The Jets, 49ers and Raiders are all options. Not sure if Gruden wants to spend that dough on a RB, but it would definitely be in their financial capabilities.
Janiel Dones Truther

Foodie. Well done steak goes in the trash.

Habaneros make the best tasting hot sauce. Throwing a bunch of random stuff on top of fries doesn't mean you call it "poutine".

jetsfan5757
Player of the Year
Player of the Year
Posts: 2223
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 9:54 am

Re: Le'Veon Bell

Postby jetsfan5757 » Tue Nov 13, 2018 2:21 pm

As a Jets fan, I kind of hope it's not us. He would help Bradford, no question, but I'd rather see that dough spent on the O-line. Crow and McGuire are way less talented than Bell, but I think QB and every skill position would look better with a stronger line. Our current center can't even get the damn ball to Darnold on a shotgun spike (because of injury, but he was struggling even before the injury).
Dynasty League (25 man rosters + 2 IR, non-PPR scoring. QB/3RB/3WR/2TE/K/DB/LB/DL no flex)

QB (1): Herbert, Lawrence, Darnold
RB (3): N. Chubb, D. Henry, J. Taylor, JK Dobbins, Pollard, Singletary, L. Murray
WR (3): D. Hopkins, D. Adams, M. Evans, D.J. Moore, DJ Chark, B. Aiyuk, J. Smith-Schuster, R Bateman, E. Moore
TE (2): I. Smith Jr, H. Henry, Schultz, Tremble

K (1): M. Crosby

DB (1): J. Adams
LB (1): F. Warner
DL (1): D. Lawrence

PS: I often don't revisit a thread after posting. Send me a message if you ever want further thoughts on a comment I made.

Cameron Giles
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 14380
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:06 pm

Re: Le'Veon Bell

Postby Cameron Giles » Tue Nov 13, 2018 2:24 pm

I could see the Colts. Mack is playing well, but it's still Le'Veon Bell and you do want to maximize Luck's prime. Jets will be linked to everyone just because they have so much room.

Others:

Texans, Titans, Ravens, Packers

User avatar
DJB
Ring of Fame
Ring of Fame
Posts: 3803
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 7:06 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Le'Veon Bell

Postby DJB » Tue Nov 13, 2018 2:29 pm

I think it would be hilarious if the Steelers tag him lol
Follow me on Twitter @NickDynastyff

jetsfan5757
Player of the Year
Player of the Year
Posts: 2223
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 9:54 am

Re: Le'Veon Bell

Postby jetsfan5757 » Tue Nov 13, 2018 2:42 pm

DJB wrote: Tue Nov 13, 2018 2:29 pm I think it would be hilarious if the Steelers tag him lol
That would be the opposite of hilarious. I am participating in the thread here, but I think the last thing we need is to talk about this same garbage for a whole other year...
Dynasty League (25 man rosters + 2 IR, non-PPR scoring. QB/3RB/3WR/2TE/K/DB/LB/DL no flex)

QB (1): Herbert, Lawrence, Darnold
RB (3): N. Chubb, D. Henry, J. Taylor, JK Dobbins, Pollard, Singletary, L. Murray
WR (3): D. Hopkins, D. Adams, M. Evans, D.J. Moore, DJ Chark, B. Aiyuk, J. Smith-Schuster, R Bateman, E. Moore
TE (2): I. Smith Jr, H. Henry, Schultz, Tremble

K (1): M. Crosby

DB (1): J. Adams
LB (1): F. Warner
DL (1): D. Lawrence

PS: I often don't revisit a thread after posting. Send me a message if you ever want further thoughts on a comment I made.

AussieMate
Player of the Year
Player of the Year
Posts: 2091
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 3:58 pm

Re: Le'Veon Bell

Postby AussieMate » Tue Nov 13, 2018 3:15 pm

jetsfan5757 wrote: Tue Nov 13, 2018 2:42 pm
DJB wrote: Tue Nov 13, 2018 2:29 pm I think it would be hilarious if the Steelers tag him lol
That would be the opposite of hilarious. I am participating in the thread here, but I think the last thing we need is to talk about this same garbage for a whole other year...
Lol no goddamn way I'll be participating again if he is somehow tagged, there would have to be 0% chance of that happening though so no need to worry. Can't wait for the draft threads in the off season about Steelers drafting an RB in the 2nd rnd though, fun fun.

User avatar
Jintsfan66
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 6:44 am

Re: Le'Veon Bell

Postby Jintsfan66 » Tue Nov 13, 2018 4:29 pm

murphysxm wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 9:13 am
JFever wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 9:10 am No concerns at all. hmmm kay. That kind of confidence is overflowing with selective biases. I guess, in the long run, we'll see. Put the patient L.Bell behind a poor o-line, offer him a ton of money, and watch him be somewhere in the middle of the pack as it pertains to fantasy production. If I were an owner, I'd have a ton of concerns. Talent simply isn't everything when it comes to rb production.
Bell isn't stupid enough to put himself behind a poor offensive line, which is a lot of my confidence. If he gets traded, whole different scenario. I just don't see that happening.
well he was stupid enough to listen to his agent and sit out all year. If he thinks teams are going to be lined up to sign him for some crazy amount of cash he is mistaken. His gamble was miscalculated.
2009, 2010, 2013, 2016 Champion, 2011 3rd Place, 2012 Runner-UP
10 Team, 17 man Roster, 4 Keepers, 1 PPR - 7th year
1QB, 2- 4 RB, 2-4 WR,1TE, TE/WR/RB FLEX, K, DEF



QB- Herbert, Love
RB - McCaffrey, Barkley, Ford, Elliott
WR- Evans, Olave, Kirk, T. McLaurin, C. Sutton, D. Johnson, Bateman
TE - Njoku, Ferguson
DEF - Cleveland

Rookie Taxi Squad - Stroud, Palmer, Mims

FantasyFreak
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 27496
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 1:03 am

Re: Le'Veon Bell

Postby FantasyFreak » Tue Nov 13, 2018 4:31 pm

Jintsfan66 wrote: Tue Nov 13, 2018 4:29 pm
murphysxm wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 9:13 am
JFever wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 9:10 am No concerns at all. hmmm kay. That kind of confidence is overflowing with selective biases. I guess, in the long run, we'll see. Put the patient L.Bell behind a poor o-line, offer him a ton of money, and watch him be somewhere in the middle of the pack as it pertains to fantasy production. If I were an owner, I'd have a ton of concerns. Talent simply isn't everything when it comes to rb production.
Bell isn't stupid enough to put himself behind a poor offensive line, which is a lot of my confidence. If he gets traded, whole different scenario. I just don't see that happening.
well he was stupid enough to listen to his agent and sit out all year. If he thinks teams are going to be lined up to sign him for some crazy amount of cash he is mistaken. His gamble was miscalculated.
Agreed.
Janiel Dones Truther

Foodie. Well done steak goes in the trash.

Habaneros make the best tasting hot sauce. Throwing a bunch of random stuff on top of fries doesn't mean you call it "poutine".

badbuddah
Captain
Captain
Posts: 825
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2015 1:40 pm

Re: Le'Veon Bell

Postby badbuddah » Tue Nov 13, 2018 4:41 pm

I can't tell if people on Twitter are trolling or actually believe this was a smart move by Bell. The 70 or 80 million dollar deal he wanted before the season won't ever happen. I don't think he ever makes over 50 million for the rest of his career. I see a deal in the 12 million per year range, max 14. I also don't think he goes to Green Bay because it isn't their MO and Jones is playing well. Texans might make sense, idk what the hell is happening with Foreman, and idk about Miller.
12 Team UNLIMITED Keeper / 23 Roster 1.0-PPR: 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 WR/RB/TE, 1 K, 1 DEF 2 IR - 11th Year

QB: L. Jackson, J. Browning
RB: Aaron Jones, D'Ernest Johnson, E. Mitchell, Dalvin Cook, Jamaal Williams, Alexander Mattison, K. Miller, P. Taylor
WR: R. Doubs, G. Pickens, Christian Kirk, Juju, D. Hopkins, D. Wicks, K. Boutte
TE: Z. Ertz, C. Okonkwo, Trey McBride, Tucker Kraft
K: T. Bass, J. Moody
DEF: San Francisco

Cameron Giles
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 14380
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:06 pm

Re: Le'Veon Bell

Postby Cameron Giles » Tue Nov 13, 2018 5:20 pm

badbuddah wrote: Tue Nov 13, 2018 4:41 pm I can't tell if people on Twitter are trolling or actually believe this was a smart move by Bell. The 70 or 80 million dollar deal he wanted before the season won't ever happen. I don't think he ever makes over 50 million for the rest of his career. I see a deal in the 12 million per year range, max 14. I also don't think he goes to Green Bay because it isn't their MO and Jones is playing well. Texans might make sense, idk what the hell is happening with Foreman, and idk about Miller.
I'm not sure why people keep referencing the 5 year, $70M offer they made. Only $10M was guaranteed as a signing bonus. So, he would've only made $10M for this season, which is $4.5M less than he could've made this season on the franchise tag. The contract contained rolling guarantees. Meaning, they would only activate by certain dates. So, there would've been $23M in guarantees if they decided to keep him around for the season after.

Basically, Pittsburgh could've got out of his contract after this season for less money and he'd still be a free agent. It was a terrible deal. I have no clue why fans are using that against Bell.

Jigga94
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 16268
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:38 pm

Re: Le'Veon Bell

Postby Jigga94 » Tue Nov 13, 2018 5:37 pm

Cameron Giles wrote: Tue Nov 13, 2018 5:20 pm
badbuddah wrote: Tue Nov 13, 2018 4:41 pm I can't tell if people on Twitter are trolling or actually believe this was a smart move by Bell. The 70 or 80 million dollar deal he wanted before the season won't ever happen. I don't think he ever makes over 50 million for the rest of his career. I see a deal in the 12 million per year range, max 14. I also don't think he goes to Green Bay because it isn't their MO and Jones is playing well. Texans might make sense, idk what the hell is happening with Foreman, and idk about Miller.
I'm not sure why people keep referencing the 5 year, $70M offer they made. Only $10M was guaranteed as a signing bonus. So, he would've only made $10M for this season, which is $4.5M less than he could've made this season on the franchise tag. The contract contained rolling guarantees. Meaning, they would only activate by certain dates. So, there would've been $23M in guarantees if they decided to keep him around for the season after.

Basically, Pittsburgh could've got out of his contract after this season for less money and he'd still be a free agent. It was a terrible deal. I have no clue why fans are using that against Bell.
I get what you are saying here. That still doesn't change the fact that hes not going to get anywhere near his asking price. The old deal means nothing in terms of what his new deal will be. I'll tell you it wont be $14.5M per year. Dumb decision to hold out, Make your $14.5M and then go sign a big deal after you prove you're worth it. Now he just looks like an a$$ who is all about the money and not the team

Cameron Giles
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 14380
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:06 pm

Re: Le'Veon Bell

Postby Cameron Giles » Tue Nov 13, 2018 5:46 pm

Jigga94 wrote: Tue Nov 13, 2018 5:37 pm I get what you are saying here. That still doesn't change the fact that hes not going to get anywhere near his asking price. The old deal means nothing in terms of what his new deal will be. I'll tell you it wont be $14.5M per year. Dumb decision to hold out, Make your $14.5M and then go sign a big deal after you prove you're worth it. Now he just looks like an a$$ who is all about the money and not the team
I agree that Bell probably isn't going to get the deal he thinks he'll get. But, I still think he'll get a good deal. All it takes is one team who feels that adding Bell can transform their offense.

Here's the thing. Why is Bell wrong for prioritizing his self worth, but the Steelers are right for prioritizing what they're willing to spend? My only criticism of Bell is the process of his holdout, but his underlying goal is correct. The Steelers were going to ride him for another season and not give him a new contract afterwards. If he got injured, then what? It wouldn't matter to them, but it would ruin Bell's value. It's the same thing as the Earl Thomas situation. Seattle doesn't give a crap that he's injured. The only thing affected is potentially the money Thomas will get as a free agent and his body. Nobody cares that he played "for the team."

NFL teams are great at making athletes look like selfish pricks for not signing the contracts they want them to. Redskins did the same thing with Kirk Cousins.

jetsfan5757
Player of the Year
Player of the Year
Posts: 2223
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 9:54 am

Re: Le'Veon Bell

Postby jetsfan5757 » Tue Nov 13, 2018 5:53 pm

Cameron Giles wrote: Tue Nov 13, 2018 5:46 pm
Jigga94 wrote: Tue Nov 13, 2018 5:37 pm I get what you are saying here. That still doesn't change the fact that hes not going to get anywhere near his asking price. The old deal means nothing in terms of what his new deal will be. I'll tell you it wont be $14.5M per year. Dumb decision to hold out, Make your $14.5M and then go sign a big deal after you prove you're worth it. Now he just looks like an a$$ who is all about the money and not the team
I agree that Bell probably isn't going to get the deal he thinks he'll get. But, I still think he'll get a good deal. All it takes is one team who feels that adding Bell can transform their offense.

Here's the thing. Why is Bell wrong for prioritizing his self worth, but the Steelers are right for prioritizing what they're willing to spend? My only criticism of Bell is the process of his holdout, but his underlying goal is correct. The Steelers were going to ride him for another season and not give him a new contract afterwards. If he got injured, then what? It wouldn't matter to them, but it would ruin Bell's value. It's the same thing as the Earl Thomas situation. Seattle doesn't give a crap that he's injured. The only thing affected is potentially the money Thomas will get as a free agent and his body. Nobody cares that he played "for the team."

NFL teams are great at making athletes look like selfish pricks for not signing the contracts they want them to. Redskins did the same thing with Kirk Cousins.
Agreed 100%. I don't fault Bell for sitting out. I fault him for stringing people, mainly his teammates, along.

And I think he will get a contract in line with or exceeding what DJ got, less than what Gurley got.

If I had to guess today, from Oakland. Gruden may not want to pay the money but those fans need something to be happy about.
Dynasty League (25 man rosters + 2 IR, non-PPR scoring. QB/3RB/3WR/2TE/K/DB/LB/DL no flex)

QB (1): Herbert, Lawrence, Darnold
RB (3): N. Chubb, D. Henry, J. Taylor, JK Dobbins, Pollard, Singletary, L. Murray
WR (3): D. Hopkins, D. Adams, M. Evans, D.J. Moore, DJ Chark, B. Aiyuk, J. Smith-Schuster, R Bateman, E. Moore
TE (2): I. Smith Jr, H. Henry, Schultz, Tremble

K (1): M. Crosby

DB (1): J. Adams
LB (1): F. Warner
DL (1): D. Lawrence

PS: I often don't revisit a thread after posting. Send me a message if you ever want further thoughts on a comment I made.

User avatar
mild
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5957
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2018 5:23 pm
Location: the Jalen Hurts bus

Re: Le'Veon Bell

Postby mild » Tue Nov 13, 2018 5:55 pm

Jigga94 wrote: Tue Nov 13, 2018 5:37 pm I get what you are saying here. That still doesn't change the fact that hes not going to get anywhere near his asking price. The old deal means nothing in terms of what his new deal will be. I'll tell you it wont be $14.5M per year. Dumb decision to hold out, Make your $14.5M and then go sign a big deal after you prove you're worth it. Now he just looks like an a$$ who is all about the money and not the team
Can I politely disagree with this? As per Earl Thomas - what if he'd gotten injured? They ran him 400 times last year, and indicated they'd do the same again this year - that's been proven to be physically unsustainable by the vast majority of RB's in the league. He's going to be a FA, he's going to have his health. That's all he wanted... that, and some respect for what he's done for the team to this point.

We can say "he lost his gamble" all we want, but we won't truly know that until FA. I think a bad team like the Jets will give him his contract. There will be a bidding war by desperate teams for a back of his skill-set. Why would there not be? David Johnson just got a nice contract in the same sort of range, and he's the same age as Bell and has been arguably less consistent (injuries + production).


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests