It makes poor business sense. Watson was (is) a toxic asset. Public relations and good will are especially important in a business model for a company that is in the sports entertainment market. If they pull off a championship they can overcome a lot of the loss of public faith, but that’s such a poor risk when you tie your franchise to the toxic asset. On top of that they’ve antagonized their competing partners with that idiotic contract, and their good will and trust is also very important in negotiating future transactions.tstafford wrote: ↑Sun Nov 19, 2023 6:28 amYeah. I'm not talking about the calculation about the player on the field. That part makes sense. I just would never want to associate myself with Watson if I were a GM or owner.TheTroll wrote: ↑Sun Nov 19, 2023 6:25 amI don’t see CLE decision (at the time) as a player wrong. They took a chance on an elite QB. The issue is the accompanying PR problem that comes with Watson.
I’m actually wanting to see how DTR does. If he can be a game manager and use his legs, CLE should still be a playoff team. The Defense is ridiculous
All in all, such a massive gamble had a whole lot more negative future outcomes than positive. CLE is just starting to feel the pain IMO. Now it looks like they’re also getting a reputation for not giving a crap about their players, given they way they dealt with Mayfield and what he sacrificed for the franchise and now having the look of doing the same with Watson’s health. That will also likely impact future transactions with players, as well as raising expectations of salary guarantees.
Lot of bad business decisions going on there.