Page 1 of 1

rodgers trade

Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2018 11:25 pm
by playa_hata
12 team PPR 5pt Passing TD superflex league team 1 in sig

I GET: Cousins, Stafford, Keenan, 2019 1st

I GIVE: Rodgers, Dak, Doctson, Allison, 19 2nd

Re: rodgers trade

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 8:01 am
by moishetreats
As of 5 votes, I am the only one to vote for the Rodgers side.

Here's why. You only start 9 players, so studs are key. As your team was, you're set at 7 or 8 positions, depending on you view CMC and Hill. And you have plenty of options to rotate your 9th player week-to-week.

Yes, depth is an issue. But, this trade barely helps. It improves your final starter to Allen, no doubt, but doesn't do much for depth. And the cost at QB is MASSIVE.

IMO, Dak is the second-best QB in this trade. But, let's presume that Dak is worst for a moment. He's still pretty close to the lesser of Cousins or Stafford. But, the difference between the stronger of those two and Rodgers is massive. Given the elite names being traded, the 2019 1st to 2nd is a loss but not a deal-breaker. I would MUCH rather have the combo of Rodgers and Dak than Cousins and Stafford, and it is nowhere near close for me. The upgrade from Doctson and Allison and from a 2nd to a 1st isn't nearly enough, IMO, to close the gap.

Re: rodgers trade

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 11:22 am
by playa_hata
moishetreats wrote: Mon Jun 25, 2018 8:01 am As of 5 votes, I am the only one to vote for the Rodgers side.

Here's why. You only start 9 players, so studs are key. As your team was, you're set at 7 or 8 positions, depending on you view CMC and Hill. And you have plenty of options to rotate your 9th player week-to-week.

Yes, depth is an issue. But, this trade barely helps. It improves your final starter to Allen, no doubt, but doesn't do much for depth. And the cost at QB is MASSIVE.

IMO, Dak is the second-best QB in this trade. But, let's presume that Dak is worst for a moment. He's still pretty close to the lesser of Cousins or Stafford. But, the difference between the stronger of those two and Rodgers is massive. Given the elite names being traded, the 2019 1st to 2nd is a loss but not a deal-breaker. I would MUCH rather have the combo of Rodgers and Dak than Cousins and Stafford, and it is nowhere near close for me. The upgrade from Doctson and Allison and from a 2nd to a 1st isn't nearly enough, IMO, to close the gap.
I appreciate you and youre time you put into this response!

Re: rodgers trade

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 12:22 pm
by playa_hata
also i value tyreek as a wr1 and top dynasty asset but i dont value cmc much at all i could probably get keenan for cmc but would really deplete my little depth at rb

Re: rodgers trade

Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 6:35 am
by joeya2001
in a SF

Ill take Cousins, Stafford, Keenan, 2019 1st

Cousins and Stafford = Arod and Dak in my opinion.

Keenan and a 1st >>>>Doctson, Allison, 19 2nd

Id take it as a win

Re: rodgers trade

Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 8:03 am
by moishetreats
playa_hata wrote: Mon Jun 25, 2018 11:22 am
moishetreats wrote: Mon Jun 25, 2018 8:01 am As of 5 votes, I am the only one to vote for the Rodgers side.

Here's why. You only start 9 players, so studs are key. As your team was, you're set at 7 or 8 positions, depending on you view CMC and Hill. And you have plenty of options to rotate your 9th player week-to-week.

Yes, depth is an issue. But, this trade barely helps. It improves your final starter to Allen, no doubt, but doesn't do much for depth. And the cost at QB is MASSIVE.

IMO, Dak is the second-best QB in this trade. But, let's presume that Dak is worst for a moment. He's still pretty close to the lesser of Cousins or Stafford. But, the difference between the stronger of those two and Rodgers is massive. Given the elite names being traded, the 2019 1st to 2nd is a loss but not a deal-breaker. I would MUCH rather have the combo of Rodgers and Dak than Cousins and Stafford, and it is nowhere near close for me. The upgrade from Doctson and Allison and from a 2nd to a 1st isn't nearly enough, IMO, to close the gap.
I appreciate you and youre time you put into this response!

also i value tyreek as a wr1 and top dynasty asset but i dont value cmc much at all i could probably get keenan for cmc but would really deplete my little depth at rb
You're welcome!

And, if you could get Allen for CMC, then I'd do that in a second!! Allen is the only major asset on the other side that makes the initial trade worth considering, IMO.

Re: rodgers trade

Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2018 6:17 pm
by dhanks91
1.Rodgers
2. Stafford
3. Cousins
4. Dak.

Stafford is an under appreciated player who should get a bump in value based on Detroit’s commitment to the RB position. I think the 2019-1 should make up the gap to Rodgers. Getting Keenan for Doctson, Allison and a 2019-2 is the deciding factor here. This would give you 3 of the 5 best assets in this deal (stafford, cousins and Allen). Tough to give up Rodgers though