Dynasty League Football Forum

2QB league in my signature

I currently own the 4th pick and I’m expecting to pick one of the top QBs but a proposal to acquire pick 3 just came across. My plan would be to grab an RB with this 2nd pick.

Proposal is:
1.3, Manny Sanders, 5.3
for
B Cooks, Garçon, 3.4

I like it

1.03 > Cooks in 2QB. Sanders >> Garcon. Take it and run.

Value isn't terrible, but I think you need Cooks for that team much more than you need a rookie RB. I'd stay put and take a QB at 1.04 and hope to compete this year.

id smash accept that. i was not a huge cooks guy tho and even less so as a ram. gimme your favorite or guice/penny/chubb plz

Goddard wrote: ↑Tue May 22, 2018 11:26 am Value isn't terrible, but I think you need Cooks for that team much more than you need a rookie RB. I'd stay put and take a QB at 1.04 and hope to compete this year.

I was very much on board with this thinking until Ingram got suspended...my RB depth is horrid, so I'm basically conceding the first 4 weeks if I don't make a move for an RB.

Iliveofftheland wrote: ↑Tue May 22, 2018 11:50 am

Goddard wrote: ↑Tue May 22, 2018 11:26 am Value isn't terrible, but I think you need Cooks for that team much more than you need a rookie RB. I'd stay put and take a QB at 1.04 and hope to compete this year.

I was very much on board with this thinking until Ingram got suspended...my RB depth is horrid, so I'm basically conceding the first 4 weeks if I don't make a move for an RB.

I also agree that you need Cooks. The right rookie RB could hold you over just fine until Ingram is back.

I see it as

Cooks>1.3
Garcon=Sanders (many will disagree)
3rd>5th

bigbuck22 wrote: ↑Tue May 22, 2018 12:06 pm

Iliveofftheland wrote: ↑Tue May 22, 2018 11:50 am

Goddard wrote: ↑Tue May 22, 2018 11:26 am Value isn't terrible, but I think you need Cooks for that team much more than you need a rookie RB. I'd stay put and take a QB at 1.04 and hope to compete this year.

I was very much on board with this thinking until Ingram got suspended...my RB depth is horrid, so I'm basically conceding the first 4 weeks if I don't make a move for an RB.

I also agree that you need Cooks. The right rookie RB could hold you over just fine until Ingram is back.

I see it as

Cooks>1.3
Garcon=Sanders (many will disagree)
3rd>5th

Thanks for the thoughts. I guess my question is -- even if I keep Cooks, does this team compete?

I’d take it.

I'd take it, but I think 1.3 is worth more than Cooks in 2 QB. Seems like thats what will determine people's opinions.

Iliveofftheland wrote: ↑Wed May 23, 2018 9:05 am

bigbuck22 wrote: ↑Tue May 22, 2018 12:06 pm

Iliveofftheland wrote: ↑Tue May 22, 2018 11:50 am

I was very much on board with this thinking until Ingram got suspended...my RB depth is horrid, so I'm basically conceding the first 4 weeks if I don't make a move for an RB.

I also agree that you need Cooks. The right rookie RB could hold you over just fine until Ingram is back.

I see it as

Cooks>1.3
Garcon=Sanders (many will disagree)
3rd>5th

Thanks for the thoughts. I guess my question is -- even if I keep Cooks, does this team compete?

With QBs Rodgers and Cam, RB Gordon, WR OBJ , TE Ertz... you definitely have enough to compete considering your other starting pieces are pretty solid. 1.3 won't help you as much as Cooks probably will.

mzkp54 wrote: ↑Wed May 23, 2018 9:43 am I'd take it, but I think 1.3 is worth more than Cooks in 2 QB. Seems like thats what will determine people's opinions.

I happen to agree as well. But, does that mean you would take 2 QBs (3 &4) or would you be okay to take an RB with one of the picks?

Iliveofftheland wrote: ↑Wed May 23, 2018 9:53 am

mzkp54 wrote: ↑Wed May 23, 2018 9:43 am I'd take it, but I think 1.3 is worth more than Cooks in 2 QB. Seems like thats what will determine people's opinions.

I happen to agree as well. But, does that mean you would take 2 QBs (3 &4) or would you be okay to take an RB with one of the picks?

I'd go whoever is available of Mayfield, then Penny, then Guice at 1.03 and 1.04.