Dynasty League Football Forum

Hello all. Hope for some good objective input here.

In my league we are as a rule of thumb not using veto ever. The league is new just started this year.

It is super flex with PPR, TE premium (1,5 PPR) with large starting req and deep rosters, including 2 TE mandatory. 14 starters in total.

The trade:
A) 2019 second, Bridgewater, Gallman, L Donnel, J Langford.

B) j Graham, 2019 first, 2018 third

No

No.

Not a great trade by any means, but not veto worthy. Some Teddy Game Manager news came out yesterday that he was progressing great, etc. etc. Either somebody is a big believer in him with it being a SF, or the seller really up sold his potential (if thats possible). I would take the Graham side, but can you really veto it? Probably not.

A 2019 1st for Bridgewater in a superflex isn't outrageous if you believe he'll come back and be a starter. A bunch of roster cloggers plus a 2nd that's 2 years out isn't enough for Graham, but it's not a league killer. Just let it go.

It's a pretty bad trade but giving away a 2019 1st isn't going to break your league. I'd worry that this owner isn't planning on sticking around that long.

Test of if it's worth a veto:

Is it collusion.... if not... not worth a veto

Luksil wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2017 6:40 am Hello all. Hope for some good objective input here.

In my league we are as a rule of thumb not using veto ever. The league is new just started this year.

It is super flex with PPR, TE premium (1,5 PPR) with large starting req and deep rosters, including 2 TE mandatory. 14 starters in total.

The trade:
A) 2019 second, Bridgewater, Gallman, L Donnel, J Langford.

B) j Graham, 2019 first, 2018 third

You already answered your own question (see the bolded portion of your post).

"No using veto ever."
Yet in the first year, you are already looking at a debatable trade as one to consider vetoing...

It seems that you may not agree with your league policies.

Valhalla wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2017 12:04 pm "No using veto ever."
Yet in the first year, you are already looking at a debatable trade as one to consider vetoing...

It seems that you may not agree with your league policies.

First year league, easy decision to get out of the league. See if you can get yourself a replacement. Too many leagues to get in to stay in one you don't have much invested and don't like before it even gets started

Why do I always fall for this click-bait?

flyersfan1981 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2017 4:34 pm Why do I always fall for this click-bait?

It's slow.

GridironGuerilla wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2017 4:39 pm

flyersfan1981 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2017 4:34 pm Why do I always fall for this click-bait?

It's slow.

Feel like a moth drawn to the pretty blue light.
"Oh look, a veto threa..... zzzzzzzzzzpzpzzpzpzzp!!!"

Not even close to being veto-worthy.