Page 1 of 4

Nuk vs 1.01

Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 3:19 pm
by spotxc
Which one u taking?

Re: Nuk vs 1.01

Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 4:06 pm
by AlPal&Ange
Nuk, he has proven NFL success. Fournette's ankle worries me a bit also.

Re: Nuk vs 1.01

Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 4:11 pm
by Cameron Giles
Nuk easily.

Re: Nuk vs 1.01

Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 6:24 pm
by smmcfarl
Cameron Giles wrote:Nuk easily.
x2

Re: Nuk vs 1.01

Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 6:26 pm
by Hammie1014
Cameron Giles wrote:Nuk easily.
x3

Re: Nuk vs 1.01

Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:14 pm
by colonnaj94
Hopkins for sure, I'd want Two 1.01s for Hopkins.. I understand he has been a major disappointment but its not really all his fault.

Re: Nuk vs 1.01

Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:23 pm
by flyersfan1981
Sigh...is this really where we are with one down season with awful QB play?

Re: Nuk vs 1.01

Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 8:41 pm
by BelichekYourSelf
Hopkins.

Re: Nuk vs 1.01

Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 9:05 pm
by Big Al
Piling on with Hopkins

Re: Nuk vs 1.01

Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 11:08 pm
by schiewerma21
1.01 easy.

In what world is hopkins worth more than the 1.01 this offseason? It's the 1.01. It always carries more weight than it should. Hopkins is why people are losing leagues. Him and turd bleep gurley (unfortunately I have both)

There is no scenario in which any person that holds the 1.01 would give it for Hopkins this offseason

Re: Nuk vs 1.01

Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 11:15 pm
by ColdZealDonkeyStrike
1.01 for me. Cook and Fournette are elite prospects, and I will take the odds that one ends up in a good situation. Meanwhile, Nuk is tied to Os for at least another year, and I don't think he will ever get the targets he got last season again.

Re: Nuk vs 1.01

Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 11:19 pm
by Favrezilla
Nuk for surely

Re: Nuk vs 1.01

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:29 am
by Cameron Giles
schiewerma21 wrote:1.01 easy.

In what world is hopkins worth more than the 1.01 this offseason? It's the 1.01. It always carries more weight than it should. Hopkins is why people are losing leagues. Him and turd bleep gurley (unfortunately I have both)

There is no scenario in which any person that holds the 1.01 would give it for Hopkins this offseason
In a world where people don't overvalue rookies. Hopkins is still a WR1 talent. He's just having a down season because of his QB.

Re: Nuk vs 1.01

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:43 am
by Evo
Wow, it shouldn't even be a question. NUK ALL DAY!

Re: Nuk vs 1.01

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 11:01 am
by CL3VELANDBR0WNS
schiewerma21 wrote: There is no scenario in which any person that holds the 1.01 would give it for Hopkins this offseason
I hold the 1.01.
I would give it for Nuk.