Gurley or 2 high 2017 1sts

[Luke7799]

Have an offer on the table for my gurley. My team is competitive but good enough in have been benching gurley most weeks.

Ppr,12 teams, nothing crazy about requirements.

I give gurley. I get 2 2017 1sts that are currently 1.1 and 1.2 with one maybe getting as high as 1.4 but 80% it starys at 1.2 and the other is pretty locked into 1.1 or 1.2

[Pvdawg5]

I'd move gurley for that. Those top 2 picks can get you fournette which could be equal to gurley and another top end talent

[lukkynumber13]

That may actually equate to Gurley's value but I would want a cherry on top. Something like Austin Hooper, Zach Ertz, Tyrell Williams, Philip Dorsett, Malcom Mitchell, Paul Perkins, etc

[moishetreats]

I would definitely take that.

[bwalsh015]

I'd take deal, you'll get the hyped up rookie RB and possibly two that could be sold for more down the road or be 2 key assets for you next year.

[DeathByAirMail]

Yeah I'm taking that deal, especially if you have the depth for that to not matter much. Obviously the '17 class has been hyped for the RBs for quite a while and like bwalsh said you could easily flip one of those picks if you wanted.

[FantasyFreak]

I think Fournette is a better talent, so if you land him plus another high first, that's a great deal. Gurley is good, but Fournette/Cook plus another top pick is a deal I would make.

[BelichekYourSelf]

I'd take that since you have the depth to bench Gurley most weeks.

[scorpion]

Yeah, if you're competitive while benching Gurley, then by all means do the trade.

[BuckeyeNation]

I'm with the others, if you're getting the almost guaranteed 1.01 plus another top 3-4 pick then I'd sell Gurley. I also agree that you should ask for a stash player thrown in. If an owner is going to give two high 1sts for Gurley, then I can't see a low-mid level prospect being a deal breaker.