Martin, Sims or CJA, Booker

[Ssickels19]

For team 2 in sig, half point per rush full ppr


Tired to move Lacy for CJA and a 17 1st but it didn't take

Thinking about offering
Give: Martin and Sims
Recieve: CJA, Booker a 17 1st

Is this too much to try to get in return?
Thanks for any advice

[Shcritters]

If I were the CJA side this would be a reject. If you tried to trade back fields that may fly, but unlikely given CJA's big game on Thursday and Booker's fumble. I think the Denver backfield is going to be a lot more 1-sided than the TB one.

[Detroitcity]

I think asking for a 2017 1st with CJA/ Booker was way too much before Thursday's game....not a chance in hell it happens now

Honestly I think Martin/ Sims for CJA/ Booker is fair straight up. Not sure which side I'd want to be on

[Ssickels19]

Thanks I might try straight up backfield swap, Idk if I trust Martin to reproduce last year

[mrmagloo]

I'd keep Martin and Sims. CJ might have had his best game for the year, I like TB to take major steps forward on the O side.

[scorpion]

I have CJA, Booker, and Sims. Can''t get the Martin owner to bite on Sims even for a '17 second, so I'm holding. Of the two backfields, I prefer CJA and Booker and can't see a 1st being added to that side ever. As much as I like Sims (as a backup and potential starter) even a straight-up trade would not interest me.