VOTE: Which statement is crazier?

[hailtoyourvictor]

I'd like to get some unbiased opinions on this.

[Dynasty DeLorean]

lol

[hailtoyourvictor]

lol

[JoshGordonsDealer]

Is this.... a joke?

[hailtoyourvictor]

Is this.... a joke?

I wish I could say it was.

[henry1jg]

lol

[Cameron Giles]

That's just the tip of the iceberg from the anti-Robinson analysis.

[princey98]

When were these statements made? Virtually everyone on these forums has said things that sound ridiculous in hindsight.

[hailtoyourvictor]

When were these statements made? Virtually everyone on these forums has said things that sound ridiculous in hindsight.

Both statements were made going into this season.

And yes, everyone has said things that sound ridiculous in hindsight. Most respectable posters will concede being wrong rather than doubling down on their previous statements.

[Phaded]

I have never seen one person hold on to something that one analyst said so badly.

It is honestly pathetic at this point.

Get over it.

[hailtoyourvictor]

I have never seen one person hold on to something that one analyst said so badly.

It is honestly pathetic at this point.

Get over it.

Nah, that writer admitted he was very wrong about Robinson. This is directed at a particular poster that was pretty rude to me about my opinion on Robinson last year and Bortles this year. Crow is nice to serve.


Props to you, though, for coming around on Robinson.

[Phaded]

I have never seen one person hold on to something that one analyst said so badly.

It is honestly pathetic at this point.

Get over it.

Nah, that writer admitted he was very wrong about Robinson. This is directed at a particular poster that was pretty rude to me about my opinion on Robinson last year and Bortles this year. Crow is nice to serve.

If said writer already admitted that - why bring up that point again in combination with the Bortles/Bridgewater point?

[hailtoyourvictor]

I have never seen one person hold on to something that one analyst said so badly.

It is honestly pathetic at this point.

Get over it.

Nah, that writer admitted he was very wrong about Robinson. This is directed at a particular poster that was pretty rude to me about my opinion on Robinson last year and Bortles this year. Crow is nice to serve.

If said writer already admitted that - why bring up that point again in combination with the Bortles/Bridgewater point?

Because, like I just said, this isn't about the writer. This is about a particular poster that told me that me saying I think Bortles will have more fantasy value than Bridgewater by the end of the season is crazier than someone saying ARob has a low-end WR2 ceiling.

Here we sit and Bortles is significantly outperforming Bridgewater and Robinson is a WR1 at age 22.

[Phaded]

So the intention of this post is literally to vaguely call out one board member without addressing him directly?

Just because he was wrong and you were right?

If it is such a big deal to you - why don't you message said member instead of wasting the board space with a childish and irrelevant poll?

[balaberda]

I have never seen one person hold on to something that one analyst said so badly.

It is honestly pathetic at this point.

Get over it.

Nah, that writer admitted he was very wrong about Robinson. This is directed at a particular poster that was pretty rude to me about my opinion on Robinson last year and Bortles this year. Crow is nice to serve.


Props to you, though, for coming around on Robinson.

Isn't there a Jags forum you can go post on? You only talk about the Jags anyways and don't really offer anything else to these forums (other than attacking people in jags threads)