Dynasty League Football Forum

tstafford wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 2:56 am I like the CW pick. Early for a QB in 1QB maybe but he's the only player in this draft who's landing spot we already "know". That de-risks the pick. Totally the opposite of the Trey Benson pick that could look brilliant or terrible in a month.

tstafford wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 2:56 am I like the CW pick. Early for a QB in 1QB maybe but he's the only player in this draft who's landing spot we already "know". That de-risks the pick. Totally the opposite of the Trey Benson pick that could look brilliant or terrible in a month.

mild wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 3:08 am

tstafford wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 2:56 am I like the CW pick. Early for a QB in 1QB maybe but he's the only player in this draft who's landing spot we already "know". That de-risks the pick. Totally the opposite of the Trey Benson pick that could look brilliant or terrible in a month.

Yeah, never a great thing to read "needed the top RB on my board because that's my teams weakness"

You would have hoped he'd try get a trade-down then... Benson over some of the (ostensible) 1st round DC WR's is a tough one to swallow

MARKinMI wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 3:13 am

tstafford wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 2:56 am I like the CW pick. Early for a QB in 1QB maybe but he's the only player in this draft who's landing spot we already "know". That de-risks the pick. Totally the opposite of the Trey Benson pick that could look brilliant or terrible in a month.

I have Benson in the same tier as a bunch of WRs still available on my board. I'm deep at WR and my only need is RB where I only had one. It's also very difficult to trade for RBs in this league so I turned to the draft for a legit shot at my RB 2 instead of my WR 6/7.


As for Williams he went right where the DLF 1 QB March Rookie ADP has him going. 1.07

MARKinMI wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 3:15 am

mild wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 3:08 am

tstafford wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 2:56 am I like the CW pick. Early for a QB in 1QB maybe but he's the only player in this draft who's landing spot we already "know". That de-risks the pick. Totally the opposite of the Trey Benson pick that could look brilliant or terrible in a month.

Yeah, never a great thing to read "needed the top RB on my board because that's my teams weakness"

You would have hoped he'd try get a trade-down then... Benson over some of the (ostensible) 1st round DC WR's is a tough one to swallow

I Spent the better part of 2 months trying to trade down, including all of draft day. I have Benson in the same tier as the other WRs that will soon be off the board. His ADP is currently 10, I took him at 8. I can live with that rather than drafting what would be my WR6/7

oh and the actual quote is:

"A bit of a reach here. I like some WRs and a few RBs around this area and chose to take the Top RB on my board. Which is also my team's biggest need."

When all things are equal between positions in a tier I go with need

MARKinMI wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 7:13 am

MARKinMI wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 3:15 am

mild wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 3:08 am

Yeah, never a great thing to read "needed the top RB on my board because that's my teams weakness"

You would have hoped he'd try get a trade-down then... Benson over some of the (ostensible) 1st round DC WR's is a tough one to swallow

I Spent the better part of 2 months trying to trade down, including all of draft day. I have Benson in the same tier as the other WRs that will soon be off the board. His ADP is currently 10, I took him at 8. I can live with that rather than drafting what would be my WR6/7

oh and the actual quote is:

"A bit of a reach here. I like some WRs and a few RBs around this area and chose to take the Top RB on my board. Which is also my team's biggest need."

When all things are equal between positions in a tier I go with need

Shcritters wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 5:34 pm For what it’s worth KTC has it even but slightly favoring the Picks side

MARKinMI wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 3:15 am

mild wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 3:08 am

tstafford wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 2:56 am I like the CW pick. Early for a QB in 1QB maybe but he's the only player in this draft who's landing spot we already "know". That de-risks the pick. Totally the opposite of the Trey Benson pick that could look brilliant or terrible in a month.

Yeah, never a great thing to read "needed the top RB on my board because that's my teams weakness"

You would have hoped he'd try get a trade-down then... Benson over some of the (ostensible) 1st round DC WR's is a tough one to swallow

Spent the better part of 2 months trying to trade down, including all of draft day. I have Benson in the same tier as the other WRs that will be soon off the board. His ADP ids currently 10, I took him at 8. I can live with that rather than drafting what would be my WR6/7

oh and the actual quote is:

"A bit of a reach here. I like some WRs and a few RBs around this area and chose to take the Top RB on my board. Which is also my team's biggest need."

When all things are equal between positions in a tier I go with need

Cameron Giles wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 5:14 pm

SoftwoodGrampian wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 3:52 pm

Cameron Giles wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 3:43 pm

Huh?

With the hope that someday 1.4 becomes half as good as JJ, and the 1.5 nearly as good as rookie phenom Jordan Addison.

One of the few trades that should be vetoed.

cazzie33 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 1:59 pm

Cameron Giles wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 5:14 pm

SoftwoodGrampian wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 3:52 pm

With the hope that someday 1.4 becomes half as good as JJ, and the 1.5 nearly as good as rookie phenom Jordan Addison.

One of the few trades that should be vetoed.

Can’t wait to see how this one ages

Everyone has starry eyes and celebrity worship over JJ but aren’t looking at total roster makeup. My projection is that was a good trade for both.

A. Richardson long term potential huge upgrade over D. Carr , Bowers isn’t a for sure thing but could be an elite TE and upgrade over L. Musgrave (who I like too but has injury riddled last cpl seasons) at the very least you have depth starters @ weak position. Nabers was already added in draft in hopes of mitigating loss of JJ so B. Thomas has to replace Addison. Pretty good roster turnover for long term gain.