halfbaked88 wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 2:55 am
Who is wearing rose colored glasses here? Frankly, I don't see how Mingo isn't showing up as an obvious red flag.
I said I was the one wearing them, i.e. I would be viewing all of Mingo's perceived negatives in a more positive light in my response. I thought that was obvious, as I said it several times........................
Anyway, to respond to the "early declare" or "Breakout age" thing, I've outlined in the past that while I DO believe that, on average, early declare and early breakout are better, they are not magical end-all be-all numbers. The rest of a players profile matters. The only person who sucked on that list that was not an early declare was Kevin White as far as I can tell. Still have to see on Claypool. Michael Thomas was in college for 4 years (but I know, was still an early declare), Sutton also played for 4 years (yet was somehow still an early declare also, i get it), but Pittman was not an early declare. Shenault stinks and was an early-declare. So you have some non-early declares stinking, but also some early-declares stinking as well, such as Funchess, N'Keal Harry, etc.
Mingo's breakout age of 20.4 is comparable to Sutton (19.9), Mike Williams (19.9), Perriman (20.0), Burks (20.5), Pittman (20.9). If you draft a receiver and they turn into Sutton, Mike Williams or Pittman, for as disappointing they've been at times, most people would consider that a win. Mingo's breakout age was significantly earlier than Michael Thomas (21.5), Claypool (21.2), Kevin White (21.2).
If you want to factor in breakout age and early-declare status, then the best comp for Mingo would be Michael Pittman, who had a similar breakout age and also was a non-early declare. Pittman received similar draft capital to Mingo. Like Mingo, Pittman was also dismissed throughout the dynasty rookie draft process because he didn't stand out on film the way people wanted, was a non-early declare, and had a "later" breakout age.