I'd agree. All the 2021 QBs were on teams more talented than their oppositionChwf3rd wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 7:21 amThink relative strength of schedule is more important.StripesOfKC wrote: ↑Tue May 10, 2022 7:34 pmThere a lot of valid complains espeically about his rookie year but level of competition I really don’t give a bleep aboutSriracha wrote: ↑Tue May 10, 2022 5:35 pm
Went hunting through twitter
Zach Wilson:
vs Power 5 non-Bowl teams or G5 under 9 Wins:
10.3 YPA, 9.5% TD%, 1.2% INT
vs Power 5 teams Bowl or G5 9+ Wins
7.3 YPA, 2.2% TD%, 2.9% INT
https://twitter.com/thorku/status/1376977468872134658
Level of competition has greatly affected Wilson's play throughout his career which leads me to believe his 2020 breakout year was largely the result of a significantly lower level of competition
Like yeah when BYU faces SEC athletes they’ll get punked. It’s not exactly some radical idea
Big Ben and Josh Allen at Miami Ohio and Wyoming got their asses beat facing Iowa and in Allen’s case Oregon and had a hard time even scoring a TD
I’d expect no different when Mormon missionaries and 2 star athletes face actual high end athletes from top of the line schools
Sure BYU didn’t play great teams but BYU also doesn’t have the same level of talent as other schools.
I’d say that Justin Fields and Ohio St, with Henderson, Garret Wilson, Olave, etc., probably had a bigger talent advantage against his competition most weeks than BYU had. Plus, with the exception of Alabama in the playoffs, Fields was awful in his toughest games in 2020 (Northwestern and Indiana).
TLDR: relative strength of competition is what matters.
The ideal would be someone like Dak at Mississippi State playing with above average P5 talent at best against teams stacked with blue chips but none of the 2021 QBs really fit that description