Cam Newton at 1.08knuckles50 wrote:4 rounds sounds good. Anyone find any of the picks strange yet?
Kyle Rudolph in the early 2nd
Cam Newton at 1.08knuckles50 wrote:4 rounds sounds good. Anyone find any of the picks strange yet?
Really? The past two years that has been about where Matt Stafford and Sam Bradford have went in my league, 1.10ish...skip wrote:Cam Newton at 1.08...knuckles50 wrote:4 rounds sounds good. Anyone find any of the picks strange yet?
The difference being some people believed Stafford was a franchise-level QB. Same with Bradford (even more so). Newton isn't carrying nearly that kind of sentiment, nor is anyone in this class.cleanwillyb wrote:Really? The past two years that has been about where Matt Stafford and Sam Bradford have went in my league, 1.10ish...skip wrote:Cam Newton at 1.08...knuckles50 wrote:4 rounds sounds good. Anyone find any of the picks strange yet?
Newton has no where near the pedigree, or exp, that Stafford and Bradford had coming out. Mallet and Gabbert have a better chance of being a Franchise QB than Newton.cleanwillyb wrote:Really? The past two years that has been about where Matt Stafford and Sam Bradford have went in my league, 1.10ish...skip wrote:Cam Newton at 1.08...knuckles50 wrote:4 rounds sounds good. Anyone find any of the picks strange yet?
Maybe Gabbart, but the folks whose jobs are on the line in making draft recommendations seem to agree that Gabbart and Newton are head and shoulders above the rest in terms of prospects. For reference see the annual Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel poll of NFL scouts.MikeCross wrote:...Mallet and Gabbert have a better chance of being a Franchise QB than Newton.
Even with Stafford's projection as a franchise QB, he wasn't drafted until 2.1 in our rookie draft.cleanwillyb wrote:As a more general question, if the number one overall player is QB/RB/WR, what is the farthest you could see them dropping in a rookie draft?
FWIW - Was avoiding making comments, didn't want to interrupt the flow. Glad the floodgate has opened.knuckles50 wrote:4 rounds sounds good. Anyone find any of the picks strange yet?
The reason I mention Rudolph being so early is relative to the talent at TE which has come out in recent years I don't believe Rudolph compares well to any of them. With the depth in this draft at RB, WR, and QB in this class coupled with the depth at TE already in the NFL, I am not anticipating Rudolph being drafted before the 3rd round regardless of where he is drafted.tstafford wrote:Rudolph. I saw Skip mentioned this seemed early for K. Rudolph. Personally, I think it's very, very hard to predict his value until after the NFL draft so I'd give a bit of a pass on this selection. Example - if he goes to Atlanta I think his fantasy value is quite high, Denver then not so much. I think more so than at any position the nature of the offense really impacts the value of a TE. Of course the other players, situation, quality of the QB, etc. affect WRs/RBs. But TEs can get really devalued if they end up in the wrong offensive scheme for fantasy - we don't get points for blocking.
You may be right. If he goes to the right spot, I bet he is off the board in many leagues somewhere in the second. I think it's possible that he's a first round NFL pick because of the scarcity at the position in this rookie class and I believe that will be enough to get some owners to reach for him.skip wrote:The reason I mention Rudolph being so early is relative to the talent at TE which has come out in recent years I don't believe Rudolph compares well to any of them. With the depth in this draft at RB, WR, and QB in this class coupled with the depth at TE already in the NFL, I am not anticipating Rudolph being drafted before the 3rd round regardless of where he is drafted.tstafford wrote:Rudolph. I saw Skip mentioned this seemed early for K. Rudolph. Personally, I think it's very, very hard to predict his value until after the NFL draft so I'd give a bit of a pass on this selection. Example - if he goes to Atlanta I think his fantasy value is quite high, Denver then not so much. I think more so than at any position the nature of the offense really impacts the value of a TE. Of course the other players, situation, quality of the QB, etc. affect WRs/RBs. But TEs can get really devalued if they end up in the wrong offensive scheme for fantasy - we don't get points for blocking.
Out of curiosity, can you list how your first round went? If you have the ability to look up that information that is.skip wrote:...Even with Stafford's projection as a franchise QB, he wasn't drafted until 2.1 in our rookie draft...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest