Page 2 of 2

Re: Gronk v Eifert

Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2016 7:39 pm
by FantasyFreak
I don't think Gronk is going to be in the league that much longer. However, I would take him based on perceived value, so I could flip him for Eifert plus, but I honestly would rather have Eifert in a vacuum, as I think Gronk is soon to be toast.

Re: Gronk v Eifert

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 7:08 pm
by ZPalmtree
I understand Brady and Belli are the G.O.A.T's at what they do, but I also think Gronk is a tremendous football player, so IMO Gronk's value is not solely tied to Brady and his production. Regardless of the QB, Gronk would still be the focal point of that offense.

Re: Gronk v Eifert

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 7:29 pm
by Cameron Giles
I just wish Kelce got into the endzone more. He'll get the yards, but only has 13 TD's in 40 career games. That's crucial in standard leagues. Gronk is still TE1 for me until I see how he looks after the back surgery. Though, I agree that the gap is closing because of the nature of the injury.

Re: Gronk v Eifert

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 8:43 pm
by KAT
Pullo Vision wrote:
Haugs32 wrote:Gronk has 3 back surgeries. Eifert has a couple much less serious injures. one elbow.. and I forget the other one. I am sooo happy I sent Gronk away for K. Allen and a 17 first (the day after K. Allen injury)
In a TE premium league, seems Gronk should be worth more than that?
the team i traded gronk away in, was not a TE premium... but I think I would have still done it.

Re: Gronk v Eifert

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 11:41 am
by kuphal_99
In my league when Gronk got hurt the Eifert owner ask for Gronk, 1.04, and a little more.

Re: Gronk v Eifert

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 11:55 am
by thomasscheeks
Ryantacular wrote:bleep give me Kelce, so I can stop wondering if my TE will play all season or not.
This. I prefer Eifert over Gronk though