Page 9 of 12

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 2:59 pm
by Phaded
I'm a Raiders fan..

But good for Antonio Gates for passing Gonzalez.

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 3:04 pm
by Wile E. Coyote
Congratulations to Antonio Gates.

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 3:07 pm
by Cameron Giles
Cutler's targeted Landry 12 times today (for 67 yards). Sounds like a Tannehill day.

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 3:09 pm
by Phaded
I am intrigued by our usage of CPatt.

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 3:10 pm
by Cameron Giles
Devante Parker just mossed Casey Hayward.

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 3:33 pm
by Cameron Giles
Gurley has looked very good in space in the receiving game. Just hurdled Breeland in route to an 18 yard TD.

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 4:06 pm
by nathanq42
Chris Carson has some bast mode in him! :)

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 4:18 pm
by Raymond1974
It's good to see Carson getting the carries but I'd hope he'd get better rushing yards. I spoke too soon, 93 yardst is not half bad on 20 carries

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 4:21 pm
by jman3134
Thoughts on Perine with Kelley out?

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 4:37 pm
by whodunnit
Gurley is actually doing really well for me. 17 points so far

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 6:07 pm
by Friction
I must say I was pretty skeptical of Montgomery at RB, but he looks the part. Pack are great at finding talent and developing them. Its the reasons like this teams like them and the Pats rule their divisions.

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 6:17 pm
by onetwothree
Friction wrote: Sun Sep 17, 2017 6:07 pm I must say I was pretty skeptical of Montgomery at RB, but he looks the part. Pack are great at finding talent and developing them. Its the reasons like this teams like them and the Pats rule their divisions.
Weren't they kinda forced into using him as a last resort at RB?

Having Rodgers and Brady will make a lot of teams look really smart.

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 6:31 pm
by Friction
Yeah i think it was definitely some of a force with his position, but he was still a good find as he was not getting much hype out of college. Just like Cobb, Jordy, Jennings, etc. Though I really liked Jordy at KU and I think Jennings had some fans even though he was from a smaller school. Either way, Montgomery looks like he could have a solid year and i was not trying to buy him anywhere in the off season when I could have.

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 7:04 pm
by Valhalla
Friction wrote: Sun Sep 17, 2017 6:31 pm Yeah i think it was definitely some of a force with his position, but he was still a good find as he was not getting much hype out of college. Just like Cobb, Jordy, Jennings, etc. Though I really liked Jordy at KU and I think Jennings had some fans even though he was from a smaller school. Either way, Montgomery looks like he could have a solid year and i was not trying to buy him anywhere in the off season when I could have.
They drafted him to be a wr. They pushed and pushed for Lacy to be their thing. Then he kept eating and they pushed some more...trying desperately to be a rushing team when they have Aaron freaking Rodgers. They were losing games because of it. Injuries to the rbs FORCED THEM to both put a wr at rb and to start passing more, which is why Aaron finished so hot, and the packers became a tougher team again. It wasn't because the team was smart. It was because they have an elite QB that they were forced to start running more of their offense through...as dumb as that sounds.

Also, Jordy went to KSU

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 7:27 pm
by Servo
I get that Denver's 2ndary is one of the best in the biz but I feel like Dez's has garbage hands.

Dude can make some great plays but has an equal amount of dumbfounding ones to boot.