Which side do you like better?

[connors2777]

Arthur Brown, Desmond Bryant, Mike Williams, round 3 pick, round 3 pick, and a round 4 pick.

OR

Luke Kuelchy and Greg Olsen.

Thanks!

[rangerdave]

Kuechly/ Olsen

[Orangedawg]

Kuechly/ Olsen

X2

[Arkived]

Kuechly/ Olsen

X2

x3

[will6779]

Fourple

[Jfever]

So the trade takes place, but revised.

It goes down like this;

Team A gave up:
Olsen, Greg CAR TE
Kuechly, Luke CAR LB

Team B gave up:
Williams, Mike TBB WR
Bryant, Desmond CLE DE
Brown, Arthur BAL LB
Year 2014 Round 2 Draft Pick
Year 2014 Round 3 Draft Pick
Year 2014 Round 4 Draft Pick

Interesting. Who wins?

[Jfever]

Looks to me like 3 quarters a dime and 2 nickles for a buck seventy-five.

I find it a touch confusing that it was accepted considering that every response above indicated that the Kuechly side was the winning side when the offer was A.Brown,Bryant, M.Williams, 2 - 3rds and a 4th. The offer gets slightly switched / improved - when a 2nd gets flipped for one of the 3rds - and then it is accepted (not even 2 -3rds but instead the 4th is included over the initial 3rd). Clearly the case of an experienced owner taking advantage of a new comer, and to make matters worse - the offering owner has, by far the best team in the league, is the commish, and still takes advantage even after seeing the responses on this forum. I realize we all like to win (I'm certainly no different), but after time - people earn reputations. This is the type of behavior from an experienced owner - that is very helpful to his competitive chances and good for his team both now and in the long run yet - very detrimental to any league and is a major cause for new ownership turnover. I understand that it is the accepting owners problem now and hopefully a lesson is learned.

Oh well - What is upsetting is that the advice was on the forum - but it didn't matter, as there was a lot of persistence on behalf of the offering owner to the new owner. Plus, the trade was accepted or at least put through 1:30 am sat night / Sunday morning which makes no sense as none of the players team A received were put into their line up (so why do it before week 4?) while Kuechly was immediately plugged into team B's lineup. We do not veto and for the record - I don't feel as if it is veto-able, so it is what it is - just another deal that makes a very strong team even stronger - all the while taking parity away from the league and making things much more difficult for an owner that is new to dynasty to experience any form of success (both short and long term). I'm disappointed, as the offering team certainly could have afforded to do a trade that helped both teams involved, rather - it appears to be an uneven trade. Again.