I am in a 1 pt PPR 10 team Dynasty, Start 1 QB, 1-3 RB, 2-4 WR, 1-2 TE, 1 Def, 1K. I have been offered the 1.1 and M. Wallace for AJG and the 3.9. I was interested in seeing what the price might be for the 1.1 and this was the owners offer. I personally was thinking more in the price range of W. Welker for the 1.1, but maybe that is too low. What are people's thoughts? Counter? Don't bother? I have traded away my 1st and 2nd rd. picks in the upcoming draft so I only have picks 3.9, 4.9 and 5.9 to offer in addition to my roster shown below. Thanks in advance
Here is my roster
Rodgers, Flacco
D. Martin, A. Peterson, Spiller, CJ2K, JSTEW, L. Miller, K. Hunter
A.J. Green, J. Jones, R. Cobb, E. Decker, W. Welker, S. Rice, V. Brown, T. Young, B. LaFell, L. Brazil, T.J. Graham
A. Hernandez, K. Rudolph, R. Housler, T. Thompson
Pitt
Kicker varies
His roster:
P. Rivers, R. Tannehill, R. Fitzpatrick
A. Foster, A. Morris, J. Rodgers, W. McGahee, E. Royster, R. Mendenhall
A. Johnson, G. Jennings, M. Wallace, J. Gordon, A. Jeffery, K. Britt, G. Little, R. Streater
J. Gresham, T. Gonzo, O. Daniels, D. Allen, F. Davis, M. Bennett
Texans
Who cares?
Offered the 1.1 and M. Wallace for AJG and the 3.9
Offered the 1.1 and M. Wallace for AJG and the 3.9
Last edited by Crazylegs on Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:31 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Offered the 1.1 and M. Wallace for AJG and the 3.9
Instant reject. AJG is worth much more than that. Another player from his side - like a rb2 or another wr2... at least. I personally would just respond and say "no thanks, I value AJG more than that". This is especially true in a 10 team with starting requirements like yours. Your team is stacked and you really don't need the 1.1 this year as it would just be depth. Maybe try to move W.Welker and CJ2K for a mid 1st and a younger talented prospect player you can stash for a year.
Truth is found through Evidence.
Science is the poetry of reality.
* Reality (as defined by Webster's dictionary) - A word for things as they actually exist, as opposed to an idealistic or notional ideal of them.
Science is the poetry of reality.
* Reality (as defined by Webster's dictionary) - A word for things as they actually exist, as opposed to an idealistic or notional ideal of them.
- MilwaukeesBest
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 4315
- Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 1:13 pm
- Location: Tampa, FL
Re: Offered the 1.1 and M. Wallace for AJG and the 3.9
Hell no.
Team 1: 10 Team, 4 Keeper League, Non-PPR
QB: Deshaun Watson
RB: Ezekiel Elliott, Leonard Fournette, Kareem Hunt
WR: Julio Jones, Dez Bryant
TE: Rob Gronkowski
QB: Deshaun Watson
RB: Ezekiel Elliott, Leonard Fournette, Kareem Hunt
WR: Julio Jones, Dez Bryant
TE: Rob Gronkowski
Re: Offered the 1.1 and M. Wallace for AJG and the 3.9
That is actually a good idea. Solid advice. I am looking to move Welker, and with this draft the value could be closer to the mid to end of the 1st rd., beginning of the 2nd rd. Maybe I will give this a shot.JFever wrote:Instant reject. AJG is worth much more than that. Another player from his side - like a rb2 or another wr2... at least. I personally would just respond and say "no thanks, I value AJG more than that". This is especially true in a 10 team with starting requirements like yours. Your team is stacked and you really don't need the 1.1 this year as it would just be depth. Maybe try to move W.Welker and CJ2K for a mid 1st and a younger talented prospect player you can stash for a year.
Re: Offered the 1.1 and M. Wallace for AJG and the 3.9
Question. What might you ask back for in terms of a young prospect at RB or WR, in addition to a mid 1st, for CJ2K and Welker?Crazylegs wrote:That is actually a good idea. Solid advice. I am looking to move Welker, and with this draft the value could be closer to the mid to end of the 1st rd., beginning of the 2nd rd. Maybe I will give this a shot.JFever wrote:Instant reject. AJG is worth much more than that. Another player from his side - like a rb2 or another wr2... at least. I personally would just respond and say "no thanks, I value AJG more than that". This is especially true in a 10 team with starting requirements like yours. Your team is stacked and you really don't need the 1.1 this year as it would just be depth. Maybe try to move W.Welker and CJ2K for a mid 1st and a younger talented prospect player you can stash for a year.
-
- All Pro
- Posts: 1889
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 10:57 pm
Re: Offered the 1.1 and M. Wallace for AJG and the 3.9
No way. There isn't much tinkering I'd do to that team unless its for your RB4 or WR4. I'd see if Welker and Stewart would get you the 1.1.
-
- All Pro
- Posts: 1889
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 10:57 pm
Re: Offered the 1.1 and M. Wallace for AJG and the 3.9
I'd want a first or second year player with some potential.Crazylegs wrote:Question. What might you ask back for in terms of a young prospect at RB or WR, in addition to a mid 1st, for CJ2K and Welker?Crazylegs wrote:That is actually a good idea. Solid advice. I am looking to move Welker, and with this draft the value could be closer to the mid to end of the 1st rd., beginning of the 2nd rd. Maybe I will give this a shot.JFever wrote:Instant reject. AJG is worth much more than that. Another player from his side - like a rb2 or another wr2... at least. I personally would just respond and say "no thanks, I value AJG more than that". This is especially true in a 10 team with starting requirements like yours. Your team is stacked and you really don't need the 1.1 this year as it would just be depth. Maybe try to move W.Welker and CJ2K for a mid 1st and a younger talented prospect player you can stash for a year.
Re: Offered the 1.1 and M. Wallace for AJG and the 3.9
D. Wilson shooting too high?TJHollywood wrote:I'd want a first or second year player with some potential.Crazylegs wrote:Question. What might you ask back for in terms of a young prospect at RB or WR, in addition to a mid 1st, for CJ2K and Welker?Crazylegs wrote: That is actually a good idea. Solid advice. I am looking to move Welker, and with this draft the value could be closer to the mid to end of the 1st rd., beginning of the 2nd rd. Maybe I will give this a shot.
Re: Offered the 1.1 and M. Wallace for AJG and the 3.9
No. Actually depending on the roster of the other owner. CJ2K for Wilson straight up is actually reasonable if he needs the immediate rb help. If you package Welker and J.stew and ask for the 1.1 you'd be giving up more value but.... still be getting the 1.1 and also creating a good trade relationship with that owner... all the while not hurting your team one bit. You'd get to pick the one wr or rb that you feel best about, stash them, and still probably be a very strong contender in 2013. You really have a nice balanced young team there. You can afford to move both Welker and C.Johnson... nice. If you feel strong about Wilson and he declines the offer of C.Johnson for him, you could counter with Johnson and Welker for Wilson and (hopefully early second or late 1st) and it would still be fair and likely accepted. (assuming of course that the owner owns a pick in that range).
Truth is found through Evidence.
Science is the poetry of reality.
* Reality (as defined by Webster's dictionary) - A word for things as they actually exist, as opposed to an idealistic or notional ideal of them.
Science is the poetry of reality.
* Reality (as defined by Webster's dictionary) - A word for things as they actually exist, as opposed to an idealistic or notional ideal of them.
Re: Offered the 1.1 and M. Wallace for AJG and the 3.9
Nice!!! Appreciate it.JFever wrote:No. Actually depending on the roster of the other owner. CJ2K for Wilson straight up is actually reasonable if he needs the immediate rb help. If you package Welker and J.stew and ask for the 1.1 you'd be giving up more value but.... still be getting the 1.1 and also creating a good trade relationship with that owner... all the while not hurting your team one bit. You'd get to pick the one wr or rb that you feel best about, stash them, and still probably be a very strong contender in 2013. You really have a nice balanced young team there. You can afford to move both Welker and C.Johnson... nice. If you feel strong about Wilson and he declines the offer of C.Johnson for him, you could counter with Johnson and Welker for Wilson and (hopefully early second or late 1st) and it would still be fair and likely accepted. (assuming of course that the owner owns a pick in that range).
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Hankybro21, HippieJuice and 37 guests