London/+ or Bijan (POLL)

[Dusticlez1]

12 team SFlex 1.0 PPR (1.5 TE) Start 9

Would you give up London/2.05/2025 1st for Bijan?

Have depth at WR and RBs are Breece/Jacobs/Dobbins/JamaalWilliams/Rico

Thanks in advance

[repkllrs]

I think London and Bijan will score similarly, so no.

[kellysheroes]

I'm taking that London package

[tstafford]

I wouldn't do it either. It's a philosophy thing - I don't want roster the top tier of RBs in dynasty. The value/volatility are too much for me. Bijan might be the exception to the rule but who knows. History says if you're not CMC, you're risky. Ask the Najee managers. It's hard to remember how "safe" he seemed because we thought the targets would provide a nice floor. Whoops.

[blueeyedbanditt]

What's your WR room look like? If that first is mid to late, I think I'd do London/1st, but I'm not throwing the 2nd in there as well.

[Tvols]

no

[killer_of_giants]

I wouldn't do it either. It's a philosophy thing - I don't want roster the top tier of RBs in dynasty. The value/volatility are too much for me. Bijan might be the exception to the rule but who knows. History says if you're not CMC, you're risky. Ask the Najee managers. It's hard to remember how "safe" he seemed because we thought the targets would provide a nice floor. Whoops.

najee was never in the same stratosphere as bijan as a prospect though.

it's a bit steep but i'm taking bijan. i like london but i don't see him as more than a solid WR2, which is relatively easy to replace, plus 2.05 and a (assuming) late '25 1st. i think bijan has a great chance at being a top 3 RB for the next 2/3 seasons, i'd pay those picks to move from a WR2 to that.

[hoos89]

I wouldn't do it either. It's a philosophy thing - I don't want roster the top tier of RBs in dynasty. The value/volatility are too much for me. Bijan might be the exception to the rule but who knows. History says if you're not CMC, you're risky. Ask the Najee managers. It's hard to remember how "safe" he seemed because we thought the targets would provide a nice floor. Whoops.

CMC has some risk too - missed 21 games in 2020 and 2021.

My answer depends on where that 2025 1st is likely to finish. If it's from a playoff lock and you're net upgrading your lineup by a decent amount I'd probably do it.

[tstafford]

I wouldn't do it either. It's a philosophy thing - I don't want roster the top tier of RBs in dynasty. The value/volatility are too much for me. Bijan might be the exception to the rule but who knows. History says if you're not CMC, you're risky. Ask the Najee managers. It's hard to remember how "safe" he seemed because we thought the targets would provide a nice floor. Whoops.

najee was never in the same stratosphere as bijan as a prospect though.

it's a bit steep but i'm taking bijan. i like london but i don't see him as more than a solid WR2, which is relatively easy to replace, plus 2.05 and a (assuming) late '25 1st. i think bijan has a great chance at being a top 3 RB for the next 2/3 seasons, i'd pay those picks to move from a WR2 to that.

Agreed. Bijan might be the exception to the rule. But I'd rather someone else was taking on that risk.

[Black Adam]

Bijan.

[Dusticlez1]

What's your WR room look like? If that first is mid to late, I think I'd do London/1st, but I'm not throwing the 2nd in there as well.

Other WRs are Nabers/Tee/Cooper/Kirk/Lockett/Jeudy. First is likely going to be in the 1.06-1.10 range.

Appreciate the responses…

[blueeyedbanditt]

What's your WR room look like? If that first is mid to late, I think I'd do London/1st, but I'm not throwing the 2nd in there as well.

Other WRs are Nabers/Tee/Cooper/Kirk/Lockett/Jeudy. First is likely going to be in the 1.06-1.10 range.

Appreciate the responses…

That's a tough one for me, but I guess I'm higher on London than others. I'm OK with it on paper if you really want Bijan. I think I would personally keep London with that WR room and then use the first next year to draft a RB if you want some more depth. I think your RB are fine for this year.

[lukkynumber13]

I wouldn't do it either. It's a philosophy thing - I don't want roster the top tier of RBs in dynasty. The value/volatility are too much for me. Bijan might be the exception to the rule but who knows. History says if you're not CMC, you're risky. Ask the Najee managers. It's hard to remember how "safe" he seemed because we thought the targets would provide a nice floor. Whoops.

najee was never in the same stratosphere as bijan as a prospect though.

it's a bit steep but i'm taking bijan. i like london but i don't see him as more than a solid WR2, which is relatively easy to replace, plus 2.05 and a (assuming) late '25 1st. i think bijan has a great chance at being a top 3 RB for the next 2/3 seasons, i'd pay those picks to move from a WR2 to that.

Agreed

[TheTroll]

London package easy for me.

[BigBawseRoss]

im pretty torn. If london does pop off with kirk this will be a good deal, if hes like he has been this will be an OK deal. 2.05 is probably a pretty good player or the range to take penix and stash him as well. lean towards london side just a bit