1.02 - Nabers (Giants) or Odunze (Bills)? (1 QB)

[Randomguess]

Just read that the Bills are trying to move heaven and earth to move up for Odunze. If they pull that off and the Giants select Nabers, who are you taking at 1.02 in a 1 QB league? (we'll assume Harrison to Cardinals is 1.01)

[murphysxm]

Both are stud WR's where landing spots shouldn't matter to me. Whoever you had ranked higher pre draft is my answer. For me it is Nabers.

[Mtt33]

I have them ranked equally so in this scenario of the bills get into the top 10 I’ll take odunze.

Where’d you see that? Can’t see how they could get up that high, that would be quite pricy.

[Randomguess]

I have them ranked equally so in this scenario of the bills get into the top 10 I’ll take odunze.

Where’d you see that? Can’t see how they could get up that high, that would be quite pricy.

per Sleeper on X

[Viking386]

Nabers. You choose the best talent.

[Black Adam]

Nabers. You choose the best talent.

^This,

Jones could get the hook really quickly and prolly won’t be there after this year with no guaranteed $ on his contract, or something could happen to Allen and it’s QB2’s time to shine. *shrugs*

[Menace2010]

Nabers is my 1.02 regardless of landing spot in 1QB. Nabers is my 1.03 in 12 or less team leagues, regardless of landing spot, in Superflex. Nabers is my 1.05 in anything over 12 team leagues for Superflex... QBs just too valuable in those formats.

[tstafford]

Nabers is my 1.02 regardless of landing spot in 1QB. Nabers is my 1.03 in 12 or less team leagues, regardless of landing spot, in Superflex. Nabers is my 1.05 in anything over 12 team leagues for Superflex... QBs just too valuable in those formats.

Interesting take. Maybe I'm too much of a slave to QB in SF.

Sitting at 1.03/1.05 w/ Kyler, Tua and Carr. Assuming the QBs go 1, 2, 3 to the teams holding those picks currently, would you rather go?
Nabers, Maye
or
Daniels, Odunze - in this case I suppose there's an outside chance the 1.04 takes Maye and Nabers falls

[Menace2010]

Nabers is my 1.02 regardless of landing spot in 1QB. Nabers is my 1.03 in 12 or less team leagues, regardless of landing spot, in Superflex. Nabers is my 1.05 in anything over 12 team leagues for Superflex... QBs just too valuable in those formats.

Interesting take. Maybe I'm too much of a slave to QB in SF.

Sitting at 1.03/1.05 w/ Kyler, Tua and Carr. Assuming the QBs go 1, 2, 3 to the teams holding those picks currently, would you rather go?
Nabers, Maye
or
Daniels, Odunze - in this case I suppose there's an outside chance the 1.04 takes Maye and Nabers falls

I'm way higher than Maye than consensus. Soooo this is easy for me, in the first scenario I think you get the two better prospects. Recognizing that may not be a popular take...

[murphysxm]

Nabers is my 1.02 regardless of landing spot in 1QB. Nabers is my 1.03 in 12 or less team leagues, regardless of landing spot, in Superflex. Nabers is my 1.05 in anything over 12 team leagues for Superflex... QBs just too valuable in those formats.

Interesting take. Maybe I'm too much of a slave to QB in SF.

Sitting at 1.03/1.05 w/ Kyler, Tua and Carr. Assuming the QBs go 1, 2, 3 to the teams holding those picks currently, would you rather go?
Nabers, Maye
or
Daniels, Odunze - in this case I suppose there's an outside chance the 1.04 takes Maye and Nabers falls

I'm way higher than Maye than consensus. Soooo this is easy for me, in the first scenario I think you get the two better prospects. Recognizing that may not be a popular take...

I might be tempted to trade 1.03 for a ransom first, but I also like Maye over Daniels and would prefer the first option. Although I fully expect Daniels to be better for fantasy in the short term if that is a factor.

edit: but option 2 is also awesome, so you have no wrong answer

[tstafford]

Interesting take. Maybe I'm too much of a slave to QB in SF.

Sitting at 1.03/1.05 w/ Kyler, Tua and Carr. Assuming the QBs go 1, 2, 3 to the teams holding those picks currently, would you rather go?
Nabers, Maye
or
Daniels, Odunze - in this case I suppose there's an outside chance the 1.04 takes Maye and Nabers falls

I'm way higher than Maye than consensus. Soooo this is easy for me, in the first scenario I think you get the two better prospects. Recognizing that may not be a popular take...

I might be tempted to trade 1.03 for a ransom first, but I also like Maye over Daniels and would prefer the first option. Although I fully expect Daniels to be better for fantasy in the short term if that is a factor.

edit: but option 2 is also awesome, so you have no wrong answer

Agreed. My plan is to offer up any my picks (1.03, 1.05, 1.10, 2.01) for a QB+ tomorrow. I'll see what comes across, but happily just draft with the picks if there isn't value to be had.

[TheTroll]

Nabers by a nose…I mean the Gmen would have to improve as a passing team sometime right?

[MacDaddy123]

Tough night for both Nabers and Odunze.