Is my current QB situation good enough?

[Last Place]

12 team PPR superflex (team in signature). I'm currently sitting on Allen, Tua Levis. I have picks 1.3 and 1.5 in the upcoming draft.

The two guys sitting at 1.1 and 1.2 have had all QBs on their rosters delegated to backup rolls this off-season after the Fields trade, so they will now both have to go QB at 1 and 2. Both hate Williams and will pass on him to grab Maye and Daniels (most likely).

Do I take Williams at 3? Or, with my current set up at QB and slight weakness at WR, do I take MHJ at 3 and Nabers at 5?

Thank you for any opinions/feedback.

[TheTroll]

Who has 1.04? Assuming you have 1.03 and 1.05 then it would make sense to take a QB and WR but you need to see how this plays out. I know you are assuming how 1.01 and 1.02 will be but you need to be prepared for a deviation.

If first two are QBs then take BPA

[Last Place]

Who has 1.04? Assuming you have 1.03 and 1.05 then it would make sense to take a QB and WR but you need to see how this plays out. I know you are assuming how 1.01 and 1.02 will be but you need to be prepared for a deviation.

If first two are QBs then take BPA

Guy sitting at 1.4 is QB needy as well. His QBs are cousins and Daniel Jones

[Finfansteve]

They may not be hating Williams come your draft day keep that in mind

[TheTroll]

Who has 1.04? Assuming you have 1.03 and 1.05 then it would make sense to take a QB and WR but you need to see how this plays out. I know you are assuming how 1.01 and 1.02 will be but you need to be prepared for a deviation.

If first two are QBs then take BPA

Guy sitting at 1.4 is QB needy as well. His QBs are cousins and Daniel Jones

Yep don’t fret here. Just take BPA at 3 and 5. Let it come to you. You most likely will get a QB and WR. WR and WR isn’t a bad thing either. You can’t go wrong with 2 of the top 5

[tstafford]

Take BPA at both picks. In SF you can't have enough QBs - as evidenced by the fact that three out of the top four picks are held by teams that need QB

[TheTroll]

Take BPA at both picks. In SF you can't have enough QBs - as evidenced by the fact that three out of the top four picks are held by teams that need QB

Hence why they are picking in the top 4. Don’t make the same mistake. :p.

Set your top 5 and take them in order. No regrets.

[abloom]

Assuming it goes as you think, I'd grab Williams at 3 and nabers at 5

[Anteaters]

12 team PPR superflex (team in signature). I'm currently sitting on Allen, Tua Levis. I have picks 1.3 and 1.5 in the upcoming draft.

The two guys sitting at 1.1 and 1.2 have had all QBs on their rosters delegated to backup rolls this off-season after the Fields trade, so they will now both have to go QB at 1 and 2. Both hate Williams and will pass on him to grab Maye and Daniels (most likely).

Do I take Williams at 3? Or, with my current set up at QB and slight weakness at WR, do I take MHJ at 3 and Nabers at 4?

Thank you for any opinions/feedback.

With Levis as your QB3, I'd target QB with your 1.03. I'd take BPA (even if it's another QB) with your 1.05.

[CGW]

Walking out of a draft with Williams and Nabers without having to pay for the 1.01 is pretty much the perfect scenario for a team that needs QB and WR.

[collbey]

Take Williams. You have to like when your league mates draft on emotion instead of common sense. It will be interesting to see if it is the case when the Pats take Maye or Daniels.